CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA - Australia's prime minister achieved an important political victory on Thursday when the Senate passed personal income tax cuts worth 144 billion Australian dollars ($106 billion) over a decade. The tax cuts for most of Australia's workforce were a centerpiece of Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's annual budget plans revealed in May. That budget is expected to be the last before Turnbull's conservative coalition seeks another three-year term at elections due by early next year. The center-left opposition Labor Party supported the proposed initial tax relief for low- and middle-income earners beginning next month. But it opposed a third and a final stage of the plan that reduces taxes of those with incomes from AU$120,000 to AU$200,000 beginning in mid-2024. Turnbull on Wednesday refused to split the legislation so that the Senate could reduce taxes for those on lower incomes but not for higher-income earners. The Senate had to pass or reject the changes in their entirety. The Senate on Thursday chose to endorse the entire package, 37-33. The government holds only 31 of the 76 seats in the Senate. Minor parties provided the majority the legislation needed, with Labor senators voting against it. Labor's leader in the Senate, Penny Wong, accused senators who supported the package of voting for a tax cut for themselves. A senator's base pay is around AU$200,000. Opposition leader Bill Shorten this week vowed to repeal the tax changes for higher-income earners if Labor wins power at the next election. But that might not be possible since governments rarely win majorities in the Senate. Shorten will also go to the election promising bigger tax breaks for modest incomes than Turnbull delivered. The Senate win will bolster Turnbull's hopes of passing corporate tax cuts through Parliament next week. 1. draw a Keynesian Model and describe it 2. New Classical Model and Keynesian model Which model is most appropriate given the evidence in the article? Justify.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA - Australia's prime minister achieved an important political victory on Thursday when the Senate passed personal income tax cuts worth 144 billion Australian dollars ($106 billion) over a decade. The tax cuts for most of Australia's workforce were a centerpiece of Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's annual budget plans revealed in May. That budget is expected to be the last before Turnbull's conservative coalition seeks another three-year term at elections due by early next year. The center-left opposition Labor Party supported the proposed initial tax relief for low- and middle-income earners beginning next month. But it opposed a third and a final stage of the plan that reduces taxes of those with incomes from AU$120,000 to AU$200,000 beginning in mid-2024. Turnbull on Wednesday refused to split the legislation so that the Senate could reduce taxes for those on lower incomes but not for higher-income earners. The Senate had to pass or reject the changes in their entirety. The Senate on Thursday chose to endorse the entire package, 37-33. The government holds only 31 of the 76 seats in the Senate. Minor parties provided the majority the legislation needed, with Labor senators voting against it. Labor's leader in the Senate, Penny Wong, accused senators who supported the package of voting for a tax cut for themselves. A senator's base pay is around AU$200,000. Opposition leader Bill Shorten this week vowed to repeal the tax changes for higher-income earners if Labor wins power at the next election. But that might not be possible since governments rarely win majorities in the Senate. Shorten will also go to the election promising bigger tax breaks for modest incomes than Turnbull delivered. The Senate win will bolster Turnbull's hopes of passing corporate tax cuts through Parliament next week. 1. draw a Keynesian Model and describe it 2. New Classical Model and Keynesian model Which model is most appropriate given the evidence in the article? Justify.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Bond
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education