Bob has to make a choice between three mutually exclusive options. He ranks these options from best (1) to worst (3). Because Bob is rational, he chooses the best option (1). The opportunity cost of Bob's decision is defined by the summed values of options 2 and 3 the average values of options 2 and 3 the value of option 2 the value of option 3

Bob has to make a choice between three mutually exclusive options. He ranks these options from best (1) to worst (3). Because Bob is rational, he chooses the best option (1). The opportunity cost of Bob's decision is defined by the summed values of options 2 and 3 the average values of options 2 and 3 the value of option 2 the value of option 3

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter17: Making Decisions With Uncertainty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17.5IP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Cost-Benefit Analysis Suppose you can take one of two summer jobs. In the first job as a flight attendant, with a salary of $5,000, you estimate the probability you will die is 1 in 40,000. Alternatively, you could drive a truck transporting hazardous materials, which pays $12,000 and for which the probability of death is 1 in 10,000. Suppose that you're indifferent between the two jobs except for the pay and the chance of death. If you choose the job as a flight attendant, what does this say about the value you place on your life?
Pls help to complete below homework : Pls explain in details why selected option is correct.
Consider a setting in which player 1 moves first by choosing among threeactions: a, b, and c. After observing the choice of player 1, player 2 choosesamong two actions: x and y. Consider the following three variants as towhat player 3 can do and what she knows when she moves:a. If player 1 chose a, then player 3 selects among two actions: high andlow. Player 3 knows player 2’s choice when she moves. Write down theextensive form of this setting. (You can ignore payoffs.)b. If player 1 chose a, then player 3 selects among two actions: high andlow. Player 3 does not know player 2’s choice when she moves. Writedown the extensive form of this setting. (You can ignore payoffs.)c. If player 1 chose either a or b, then player 3 selects among two actions: high and low. Player 3 observes the choice of player 2, but not that of player 1. Write down the extensive form of this setting.(You can ignore payoffs.)
You and a coworker are assigned a team project on which your likelihood or a promotion will be decidedon. It is now the night before the project is due and neither has yet to start it. You both want toreceive a promotion next year, but you both also want to go to your company’s holiday party that night.Each of you wants to maximize his or her own happiness (likelihood of a promotion and mingling withyour colleagues “on the company’s dime”). If you both work, you deliver an outstanding presentation.If you both go to the party, your presentation is mediocre. If one parties and the other works, yourpresentation is above average. Partying increases happiness by 25 units. Working on the project addszero units to happiness. Happiness is also affected by your chance of a promotion, which is depends on howgood your project is. An outstanding presentation gives 40 units of happiness to each of you; an aboveaverage presentation gives 30 units of happiness; a mediocre presentation gives 10 units…
Kimberly's sister would like to start a business with her brother selling simple T-shirts that are green in color at all stores in the area. Her brother disagrees and thinks that the shirts should have a special logo on them and should be sold only at specific stores. As the deciding vote, what should Kimberly choose and why? Choose one: A selling green T-shirts because prices will be higher as the number of stores increases B. selling green T-shirts because prices will be higher as the shirt becomes more commonplace OC. selling shirts with a special logo because prices will be higher as the shirts becomes more unique OD. selling shirts with a special logo because prices will be higher as the shirts are sold in fewer stores OE. both C and D
Amy must decide whether or not to make an investment that costs 1. The investment pays a return of 5, but is risky to Amy because Bill must be given charge of the asset if it is to be productive. If Amy invests, then Bill must decide whether to keep the entire return for himself, or to split the return, giving 3 to Amy and keeping 2 for himself. (Amy pays the cost 1 even if Bill does not pay her back.) If Amy does not invest, then both players get 0. This is called a trust game because Amy wants to invest only if she trusts Bill to pay her back. (a) Model this as an extensive-form game (b) What is the strategic-form corresponding to your extensive-form? (c) Find all of the Nash equilibria. Which are the subgame-perfect?
1) The following payoff table shows the profit for a decision problem with two (2) states of nature and two (2) decision altematives. Alternative Course of Action State of Nature Probability A Az 0.64 5 0.36 3 11 a) Using Maximin, decide the best action to be taken. b) Compute the expected opportunity loss (EOL) for each altemative course of action. c) Find the expected value of perfect information (EVPI). d) Using Return-to-Risk ratio (RTRR), decide the best action to be taken.
You are considering two options for your next family vacation. You can visit Disney World or Chicago. Your utility from Disney World is 100 if the weather is clear, and 0 if it rains. Chicago is worth a utility of 70 if the weather is clear and a utility of 40 if the weather is rainy. Also assume that the chance of rain at Disney World is going to be 50% and the chance of rain in Chicago is 40%. As a utility maximizer, should you plan to go to Disney World or Chicago? (Explain using relevant equations)
Suppose that you graduate from college next year and you have two career options: 1) You will start a job in an investment bank paying a $100,000 annual salary. 2) You will start a Ph.D. in economics and, as a student, you will receive a $20,000 salary. You are bad with decisions, so you are letting a friend of yours decide for you by flipping a coin. The probabilities of options 1 and 2 are, therefore, each 50%. a) Illustrate, using indifference curves, your preferences regarding consumption choices in the two different states of the world. Assume that you are risk-averse. [Include also the 45 degrees line in your figure] b) Now show how the indifference curves would change if you were substantially more risk averse than before. Explain. c) Now show the indifference curves if you are risk neutral and if you are risk loving. d) Show your expected utility preferences from point a) mathematically.
Becky is deciding whether to purchase an insurance for her home againtst burglary. the payoff for her is shown as follow: Net worth of her Net worth of her home: $ 20000 burglary(10%) Net worth of her Net worth of her home: $50000 burglary (90%) The insueance would cover all the loss from burlary and the insurance fee is $8000. Her utility funtion is given as u=w ^0.3 Should Beck purchase the insurance Explain.
2. Consider the following Bayesian game with two players. Both players move simultaneously and player 1 can choose either H or L, while player 2's options are G, M, and D. With probability 1/2 the payoffs are given by "Game 1" : GMD H 1,2 1,0 1,3 L 2,4 0,0 0,5 and with probability 1/2 the payoffs are according to "Game 2" : G |M|D H 1,2 1,3 1,0 L 2,4 0,5 0,0 (a) Find the Nash Equilibria when neither player knows which game is actually played. (b) Assume now that player 2 knows which one among the two games is actually being played. Check that the game has a unique Bayesian Nash Equilibrium.
Public Good Contribution: Three players live in a town, and each can choose to contribute to fund a streetlamp. The value of having the streetlamp is 3 for each player, and the value of not having it is 0. The mayor asks each player to contribute either 1 or nothing. Each player makes a decision without knowing others’ contributions. If at least two players contribute then the lamp will be erected. If one player or no players contribute then the lamp will not be erected, in which case any person who contributed will not get his money back. Write down the strategy sets of each player, their payoffs, and find all pure-strategy Nash equilibria.