b) Ana also reads that climate change is caused by carbon emissions from air travel. Two  airlines run flights between two cities, Air A and Air B. The government has said that  the airlines can produce 100 units of carbon emissions between them, under a carbon  permit scheme, and should decide how to split the 100 units between them. Air A and  Air B have the same operating costs and the same costs of reducing the amount of carbon  that they produce per flight. Say Air A has been operating on the route for over 50 years and the government decides to give  all the permits to Air A (based on its long use of the route). Air A offers a proportion R of the  100 units of permits to Air B and Air B can accept the offer or reject it and not fly on the route. • How will the other parameters of the model as discussed in this module affect the value  of R* at which Air B accepts the offer? • Say that the government gives the permits to Air A for 5 years, and will gives them to  Air B for years 6 to 10. So after 5 years, Air B can decide how they should be allocated  between the airlines. How does this kind of setup affect the offers that will be made and  whether those offers will be accepted?

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter16: Labor Markets
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 16.11P
icon
Related questions
Question

Part B C D needed

b) Ana also reads that climate change is caused by carbon emissions from air travel. Two 
airlines run flights between two cities, Air A and Air B. The government has said that 
the airlines can produce 100 units of carbon emissions between them, under a carbon 
permit scheme, and should decide how to split the 100 units between them. Air A and 
Air B have the same operating costs and the same costs of reducing the amount of carbon 
that they produce per flight.
Say Air A has been operating on the route for over 50 years and the government decides to give 
all the permits to Air A (based on its long use of the route). Air A offers a proportion R of the 
100 units of permits to Air B and Air B can accept the offer or reject it and not fly on the route.
• How will the other parameters of the model as discussed in this module affect the value 
of R* at which Air B accepts the offer?
• Say that the government gives the permits to Air A for 5 years, and will gives them to 
Air B for years 6 to 10. So after 5 years, Air B can decide how they should be allocated 
between the airlines. How does this kind of setup affect the offers that will be made and 
whether those offers will be accepted?

c) Tackling climate change, a global problem, requires international agreements and successful 
implementation of those agreements. Explain, using examples from Climate Change 
Agreements since Kyoto 1997 and your knowledge of strategic interactions over time, why 
global agreements are difficult to implement in practice. Referring to the game you have 
used, make one recommendation on how you think the game could be changed so as to 
predict an increase in the chances of agreements being implemented. Make sure to include 
any appropriate equations or graphical analysis and independent research as relevant. 

d)

Consider an economy (call it country G) that is implementing climate change legislation
more rapidly than other countries (refer to them as ‘row’ for ‘rest of the world’). Explain how 
this decision by country G could affect its long-run markup. Using diagrams, explain your 
forecast for the effect of this decision on real wages, inequality and employment in G in the 
new equilibrium. In the light of your findings, what advice would you give to a policy maker 
in G?

e)A government announces a green budget where they will provide zero interest loans for
private sector investment in green electricity production, spend on government investment in 
rail transport and increase value added tax on all consumer goods with a high carbon 
footprint. Use the multiplier model (diagram and equations) to explain the likely effect on 
aggregate demand in the economy. Assume ceteris paribus. In your answer explain how you 
are interpreting ‘cet. par.’ when discussing the predictions of the multiplier model.

f)

Now, suppose the economy in which the policies in parts (D) and (E) were implemented was 
initially in equilibrium (i.e. with zero net entry and constant inflation). It has an inflationtargeting central bank. How would you expect the central bank to respond to the 
implementation of these policies? Use a diagram to help you explain this using the concepts 
of the WS/PS model, AD curve, Phillips curve, the bargaining gap, central bank preferences. 
(Do not explain how the economy would react to the central bank’s behaviour.) Would 
consideration of the central bank’s reaction lead you to alter the advice you offered the policy 
maker in (D)? Assume that you cannot interfere with the central bank

A)
Ana decides every day how many hours to work and how much beef to consume. She spends all
income earned from work each day on consumption of beef.
Her utility function for free time (t, 24 hours minus hours worked) and consumption (y) is:
U(t, y) = 2t + y
The price per unit of beef consumed is 4 and her hourly wage is 1.
• Using a diagram and appropriate algebra, explain what Ana's optimal number of hours
work and units of beef consumed are each day.
Ana reads a book about the impact of beef consumption on climate change and realises that there
is a cost to society of her beef consumption. She takes account of this impact on society in her
own decisions, incorporating a disutility of -0.03y per unit of beef consumed. She still only
consumes beef and spends all income earned each day on this consumption.
• Explain, using a diagram and appropriate algebra, how recognition of the impact of her
consumption choice on climate change impacts on Ana's daily free time and beef
consumption choice.
Suppose that Ana knew about the impact of beef consumption on climate change but did
not take it into account when making her private decision about how much free hours
and beef to consume. What could a government do to get her to reduce the impact of her
consumption on the environment?
Transcribed Image Text:A) Ana decides every day how many hours to work and how much beef to consume. She spends all income earned from work each day on consumption of beef. Her utility function for free time (t, 24 hours minus hours worked) and consumption (y) is: U(t, y) = 2t + y The price per unit of beef consumed is 4 and her hourly wage is 1. • Using a diagram and appropriate algebra, explain what Ana's optimal number of hours work and units of beef consumed are each day. Ana reads a book about the impact of beef consumption on climate change and realises that there is a cost to society of her beef consumption. She takes account of this impact on society in her own decisions, incorporating a disutility of -0.03y per unit of beef consumed. She still only consumes beef and spends all income earned each day on this consumption. • Explain, using a diagram and appropriate algebra, how recognition of the impact of her consumption choice on climate change impacts on Ana's daily free time and beef consumption choice. Suppose that Ana knew about the impact of beef consumption on climate change but did not take it into account when making her private decision about how much free hours and beef to consume. What could a government do to get her to reduce the impact of her consumption on the environment?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
World Trade Organization
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305971493
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781285165875
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning