arding was fond of violating his employer’s company policies. As a result, he was asked by his employer to sign a resignation/termination letter which he did. He received a separation pay. Is the separation pay taxable to Carding? a. Yes, his separation is voluntary and not one of those enumerated under the law to be tax-exempt. b. No, his separation was involuntary. c. No, his separation was against the law. He should be reinstated back to employment and return his separation pay. d. Answer not given.

arding was fond of violating his employer’s company policies. As a result, he was asked by his employer to sign a resignation/termination letter which he did. He received a separation pay. Is the separation pay taxable to Carding? a. Yes, his separation is voluntary and not one of those enumerated under the law to be tax-exempt. b. No, his separation was involuntary. c. No, his separation was against the law. He should be reinstated back to employment and return his separation pay. d. Answer not given.

Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305224414

Author:JENNINGS

Publisher:JENNINGS

Chapter20: Management Of Employee Welfare

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Mrs. Y, wife of a deceased employee, received financial benefits voluntarily voted upon by the Board of Directors of the employer-company in recognition of her husband’s long and loyal service and primarily to help her meet financial needs. Which of the following is false? A. Mrs. Y is not subject to income tax on the financial benefits she received because there were no services rendered by Mrs. Y. B. Mrs. Y is subject to income tax on the financial benefits she received because such amount is in consideration of her deceased husband’s employment. C. The amount is not considered as income of the deceased employee because the giving was not in payment for services rendered. D. A and B
Virginia Pecson is an MWE working in Quezon City. As such, her employer did not withhold any tax from her compensation. In addition to her Statutory Minimum Wage (SMW), she also earned a one-time commission from her employer in September of taxable year 2018. In what months of the taxable year shall her employer withhold income tax from her SMW? (a) When she received the commission in September, she ceased to be an MWE. Her employer shall withhold income taxes from her compensation (which includes the SMW) received in the months of September thru December 2018. (b) None. Her employer may not withhold income taxes from the SMW she received in all the 12 months of 2018. Her employer shall withhold the CWT only from the commission she received in September 2018. (c) In all the months of 2018. (d) None of the above.
Vanida received workers' compensation due to an injury on the job. When Vanida files her tax return, her workers' compensation income will be: Fully taxable. Nontaxable. Partially taxable. Taxable at the discretion of the employer.
Jose sued Mari for breach of promise to marry. Mari lost the duly paid the court's award that included, among others, P100,000 as moral damages for the mental anguish Jose suffered. Did Jose earn a taxable income? He had no taxable income because it was a donation. He had no taxable income since moral damages are compensatory. He had taxable income since he made a profit. He had a taxable income of P100,000 since income is income from whatever source.
Doug and Tammy are not related and do not live together. Doug is employed and earns commission income. Tammy is an independent broker and earns commission income. Both maintain an office in their homes. Which of the following statements is false regarding the tax treatment of their incomes for 2020? (a) Tammy can incur a non-capital loss, but Doug cannot. (b) Tammy and Doug can deduct a portion of their property tax and house insurance (c) Tammy can deduct a portion of her home mortgage interest, but Doug cannot. (d) Tammy and Doug can claim CCA on their computers.
Matilda is a limited partner in Partnership JKL, and she does not materially participate in the business. Choose the response that correctly completes the last sentence about her ability to claim the qualified business income deduction. If she is eligible for the deduction, select the response that describes how the amount of her deduction is computed. If she is not eligible, select the response that correctly explains the reason why she cannot claim the deduction Matilda is: 1) Eligible for the deduction, and the exact amount she is eligible to deduct is computed on the partnership's tax return and reported to her on Schedule K-1 (Form 1065). 2) Eligible for the deduction, but she must figure the exact amount she is eligible to deduct based on information the partnership provides on her Schedule K-1 (Form 1065). 3) Not eligible for the deduction because she is not a general partner. 4) Not eligible for the deduction because she does not materially participate in the busines
Matilda is a limited partner in Partnership JKL, and she does not materially participate in the business. Choose the response that correctly completes the last sentence about her ability to claim the qualified business income deduction. If she is eligible for the deduction, select the response that describes how the amount of her deduction is computed. If she is not eligible, select the response that correctly explains the reason why she cannot claim the deduction. Matilda is: (a) Eligible for the deduction, and the exact amount she is eligible to deduct is computed on the partnership's tax return and reported to her on Schedule K-1 (Form 1065). (b) Eligible for the deduction, but she must figure the exact amount she is eligible to deduct based on information the partnership provides on her Schedule K-1 (Form 1065). (c) Not eligible for the deduction because she is not a general partner. (d) Not eligible for the deduction because she does not materially participate in the business.
Another example: Mr. Swabe was diagnosed to have a sexually transmitted disease (STD). Due to this, his employer decided to terminate his services but granted him P 1,000,000 separation pay. Question: Is the separation pay taxable?
Bill and karen are divorced and the parents of one child who is in bill's custody. in order to work, bill pays karen to care for the child. assuming that karen did not reside with bill, can boll claim a deduction for the child care expenses he incurred?
Bruce is single and has adjusted gross income for the current year of $90,000 before any deduction for passive activity losses. He owns a duplex that he uses as rental property and this year his rental loss was $13,000. Bruce has no income from passive activities. Which of the following statements is true? Group of answer choices If Bruce actively participates in managing the rental property he can deduct the $13,000 loss against his other income. Bruce will not be able to deduct the $13,000 loss against his other income unless he materially participates in managing the property. Since Bruce’s income does not exceed $150,000 he can deduct the loss against his other income regardless of his role in managing the property. In no circumstance will Bruce be able to deduct the loss this year since he does not have any passive income.
Jackie derives its sole income from Zhakie. Said income is normally subject to withholding taxes. Jackie found out that there is a statute providing tax exemption. Knowing he is within the scope of the exemption, Jackie asked Zhakie to return the previously withheld amount. Zhakie refuses to do so since the related expense might be disallowed if it fails to withhold. Who has the responsibility to prove that Jackie is exempted? Zhakie BIR Congress Jackie
Isko owns a residential condominium unit in Manila Prime Towers Condominium (MPTC), which he later on sold to Bato. Apparently, Isko did not report such sale; did not pay the capital gains tax due; and did not declare the proceeds of sale as part of his income when he filed his tax returns. On a routine examination, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) happens to check on Isko’s tax returns. Knowing that Isko had a unit in MPTC, BIR asked management of information about it and its ownership status, which MPT complied. BIR learned that Isko did not register his sale of his unit and pay the taxes due, hence, he was assessed with deficiency taxes. Isko now questions the act of MPTC in providing his information and data to the BIR. He claims that he was not inform by the MPTC and did not authorize the giving of such information. He said that MTC violated his rights under the Data Privacy Act. Is Isko correct? Why or why not. Support your answer with the provision/s of the law.