Anna's investment is worth $2.5 million (decreased from $3.5 to $2.5 million) Elsa's investment is worth $2.2 million (increased from $2 to $2.2 million) For each of them write down the reference utility function (First determine the reference point (use a parameter) and derive reference utility function for each).

Anna's investment is worth $2.5 million (decreased from $3.5 to $2.5 million) Elsa's investment is worth $2.2 million (increased from $2 to $2.2 million) For each of them write down the reference utility function (First determine the reference point (use a parameter) and derive reference utility function for each).

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter10: Consumer Choice Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Jien is just bored all the time; no amount of success makes him happy, it seems. Below is a list of his income for the last several years and the utility he experienced per dollar of income: Year Yearly Income Utility per Dollar Earned 2017 $60,000 2 utils 2018 $70,000 1.8 2019 $100,000 1.5 2020 $120,000 1 2021 $145,000 0.40 From the above, we can say that Jien most likely is different from most people economists study in terms of risk attitudes is "risk loving" will not take a fair bet has a utility of wealth curve that is a straight line
What is a lifetime utility function, and in what sense does it exhibit diminish-ing returns?
of 55 The vending machine in Katherine's office building offers cans of pop and candies. Katherine's utility function is U = 3PC, where P is the amount of pop consumed per week and C is the amount of candy consumed per week. Pop costs $1 and candy costs $0.5 per bag. If Katherine has $10 to spend, she will consume
Economics Anna's investment is worth $2.5 million (decreased from $3.5 to $2.5 million) Elsa's investment is worth $2.2 million (increased from $2 to $2.2 million) For each of them write down the reference utility function (First determine the reference point (use a parameter) and derive reference utility function for each).
Max is very peculiar about his morning coffee routine. He likes to use exactly two spoons of coffee for every six ounces of water. This give him the following utility function: U = min(2Water, 6Cof fee), where Water (W) is measured in fluid ounces and Coffee (C) in spoons. (a) afford while utility-maximizing? How many spoons of coffee does he use in doing so? (b) If he spends exactly $2 on coffee every morning, how many 8 ounce cups of coffee can he How much utility does Max get from his morning cup/s of coffee?
1. Prove if the indirect utility function is quasiconvex The indirect utility function: V(p,w) = w[P1^(p/p-1) + P2^(p/p-1)]^((1-p)/p)
Using apporiate diagram, explain how an in-kind transfer results in a lower utility level than a cash transfer
‘‘Risk-averse people should only be averse to big gambles with a lot of money at stake. They should jump on any small gamble that is unfair in their favor.’’ Explain why this statement makes sense. Use a utility of income graph like Figure 4.1 to illustrate the statement. For a challenge, demonstrate the statement using a two-state graph like Figure 4.6.
4. Show how to construct the reference dependent utility function for two friends Kate and Mary whose gains and losses are listed as follows : Kate's net worth is $ 4.5 million ( decreased from $ 5.5 to $ 4.5 million ) Mary's net worth $ 3.2 million ( increased from $ 3 to $ 3.2 million ) ( First determine the reference point ( use a parameter ) and then derive reference utility function for each ) .
1. A standard model of choice under risk is Expected Utility Theory (EUT) in which preferences over lotteries that pay monetary prizes (x₁, x2, ..., xs) with probabilities (P1, P2, ..., Ps) with Eps = 1 are represented by the function L S (a) What does it mean to say that a function represents the consumer's prefer- ences? Σpsu(xs) Choice 1 8=1 (b) State and briefly comment on the axioms required for the EUT representation. (c) Consider the following experiment of decision making under risk in which sub- jects are asked which lottery they prefer in each of the following two choices: Lottery B 0 with prob. 0.01 10 with prob. 0.89 50 with prob. 0.10 Lottery D Choice 2 Lottery A 0 with prob. 0 10 with prob. 1 50 with prob. 0 Lottery C 0 with prob. 0.90 10 with prob. 0 50 with prob. 0.10 Suppose that the modal responses are Lottery A in Choice 1 and Lottery D in Choice 2. Assume that utility of zero is equal to zero and illustrate why it is not possible to reconcile these experimental…
Question 2 David spends his budget on chocolate and chip. His utility function is given by ?(?1,?2)= 2?1?2, where ?1 is the number of chocolates he consumers per week, and ?2 is the number of chips he buys per week. A chocolate costs 10 SEK, and a chip costs 20 SEK. David’s weekly budge for consuming on these two goods is 120 SEK. (1) What is David’s budge line? Draw the budget line on a graph with chocolate amounts on the horizontal axis and chip amounts on the vertical axis. Write explicitly at which points budget line crosses the axis. (2) What is David’s marginal utilities for the two goods, respectively? What is his marginal rate of substitution between the two goods? (3) What is David’s optimal choice? Calculate the numerical answer for the optimal bundle. Also draw an indifference curve for David on the same graph as question(1) and show the optimal bundle.
Daniel and Kjell are writing a paper together. Daniel is the PhD supervisor and thus is the first to decide how many hours, hp. to put into the project. After observing the amount of time that Daniel contributes, Kjell decides how many hours, hK. to contribute. Daniel's utility function is 12(hp+ hx)5 -hp Kjell's utility function is 14(hp+hx)0.-hx How many hours does Kjell spend on the project? Select one alternative: O 49 O 26 O 32