An offer can be defined  as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous.   Critically discuss this statement, with the following requirements; Five (5) applicable case laws on the subject matter. State clearly The issue Basic facts of the Cases The Judgement

Summarize the account of conflict of interest we have examined in the readings. Second, argue whether the case of Qual Plus HMO contains a conflict of interest and, if so, who faces them. Finally,  discuss the methods of addressing conflicts of interest and propose a resolution to the conflicts of interest in the case and a discussion of the moral status of the people involved in the case. Your discussion must include: An introduction  An account of the meaning of “conflict of interest An argument for whether or not the case contains conflicts of interest, and why  An account of methods for addressing conflicts of interest  An application of the methods to the case  A conclusions

When a party to a lawsuit for breach of contract files pleadings, they must conform to which set of rules? Multiple Choice The Rules of Civil Litigation The Federal Rules of Contracts The Federal Rules of Evidence The Rules of Civil Procedure

a. Provide a reasonable textbook definition of what intoxication in law means with the use of examples. b. Use your critical analysis skill to explain how a person can avoid a contract entered into under intoxication. Use      the case laws below and state the issue, facts, and judgment of them. Halsted v. Globe Indemnity Co. (1935) Jackson v. Alexander (1879) Matthews v. Baxter (1873)

Anticipatory repudiation can occur in which of the following ways? I. A statement by one party of its intent not to perform. II. An action by the promisor that rendered performance impossible. III. Knowledge by the parties that one party may be unable to perform despite both parties' efforts. IV. After a contract has been discharged.   Multiple Choice   II and III. I and II. I and III. III and IV. I, II, and III.

29 of 75 If a buyer does not make inspections during the inspection period, the standard purchase and sale agreement automatically extends the inspection period unless the seller objects. requires the buyer to accept the property "as is." requires the seller to have the inspections performed at the buyer's expense. states that the closing date will be postponed subject to negotiation.

Sometimes an issur with a property is discovered during the pre-closing stage. Buyers may be willing to accept deficiencies if they an compensate through a price reduction. Which of the following is correct regarding adjusting a purchase price to offset a deflciency.Select one: O. The value of the price adjustment may become a matter of negotiations between the parties. O. A new agreement of purchase and sale must be drafted and signed to finalize the price adjustment. O. A formal appraisal is always required to determine the adjusted purchase price.  O. Buyers are contractually obligated to negotiate an adjusted purchase price.

Please don't give image format and no chatgpt answer

Summarize the account of conflict of interest we have examined in the readings. Second, argue whether the case of Qual Plus HMO contains a conflict of interest and, if so, who faces them. Finally, discuss the methods of addressing conflicts of interest and propose a resolution to the conflicts of interest in the case and a discussion of the moral status of the people involved in the case. Your discussion must include: An introduction  An account of the meaning of “conflict of interest An argument for whether or not the case contains conflicts of interest, and why  An account of methods for addressing conflicts of interest  An application of the methods to the case  A conclusion