Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion Patricia has a contract with Sandy for personal services. Sandy breaches the contract and Patricia sues. The judge rules that Patricia’s contract with Sandy is unenforceable due to it being “Unconscionable.” What does that mean?

John works as an engineer for a technological company, and Maria works as a sales executive for a competitor business. Maria reminded John that her profession contains sensitive information, and she cautions him not to reveal anything he learns from her work to anyone. While attending a conference, John overheard two executives from Maria's company discussing a new product launch. He chooses to buy a modest amount of Maria's company's shares, intending to profit from the predicted increase in the company's stock price following the product launch. John double-checked his company's regulations to ensure that there was no conflict of interest or limitation on the purchase. However, as a result of unanticipated factors, the product introduction was delayed, and the stock price of Maria's company fell instead. Instead of the predicted profit, John's investment resulted in a loss. Question : In the view of conflict of interest of ethics in financial analysis, state the key points of the…

discuss the concept of the effective assistance of counsel, why the Court looks at the concept of ineffective assistance of counsel, and what the defendant must prove in order for the court to determine if the defendant lacked the effective assistance of counsel.

From 2015 to 2021, Jerry lived in Houston, Texas and worked at Zydeco Records. Zydeco Records is a family-owned business with one store in Houston, Texas. In January 2022, Jerry was fired from Zydeco Records, and he moved to Colorado to work on a horse ranch. On March 10, 2022, Jerry sued Zydeco Records for breach of contract, a state-based claim. Jerry files his suit in Colorado state court. To avoid the Colorado court's jurisdiction, what should Zydeco Records do first? File an answer. File a default judgment. File a motion for new trial. O File a special appearance. ◄ Previous Next ▸

Subject - account  Please help me.  Thankyou.

a. Provide a reasonable textbook definition of what intoxication in law means with the use of examples. b. Use your critical analysis skill to explain how a person can avoid a contract entered into under intoxication. Use      the case laws below and state the issue, facts, and judgment of them. Halsted v. Globe Indemnity Co. (1935) Jackson v. Alexander (1879) Matthews v. Baxter (1873)

Ma3. Explain in brief. Sally Henderson is an employee of Good Eats Restaurant. Sally's contract with Good Eats Restaurant states: "Sally Henderson shall ensure the bathrooms and dining room area are reasonably clean during operating hours." Sally's good friend James is also employed by Good Eats Restaurant as a parking attendant, a person who parks customers’ cars. On a very busy night at Good Eats Restaurant, without the authorization of Good Eats Restaurant, Sally decided to help her friend James park cars. Sally injures a customer due to Sally's negligent driving while parking cars. The injured customer sues Sally and Good Eats Restaurant. Is it likely that Good Eats Restaurant will be determined to be liable to the injured customer. BRIEFLY EXPLAIN.

Federal laws such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and HIPPA, apply to claims handling and to the professional activities of the claims representative.  True False

Francine posts on social media that she will pay $500 to anyone who will clear her lawn of leaves. One of Francine's friends is dating Bob, who goes out and collects all the leaves. When he asks for payment, Francine says that the two never had a contract. Is Francine correct? Briefly explain.

In the Silvestri v. Optus Software, Inc. case, the employment contract contained a 2-year employment agreement with a satisfaction clause. Which of the following was held? A. The satisfaction clause was not enforced, because it was a restraint on trade. B. The satisfaction clause was not enforced, because it was subjective. C. The employer breached the contract and had to pay damages. D. The termination of employment before the 2- year period was enforced.