An employer has hired Freddy and the current compensation contract gives Freddy $6,600 with prob. 0.3 and $1,550 with prob. 0.7. Assume Freddy is risk averse, with the utility function u(x) = x0.5. The employer is considering changing the contract so that Freddy is paid a fixed X, where X is equal to the expected value of the current contract In this

An employer has hired Freddy and the current compensation contract gives Freddy $6,600 with prob. 0.3 and $1,550 with prob. 0.7. Assume Freddy is risk averse, with the utility function u(x) = x0.5. The employer is considering changing the contract so that Freddy is paid a fixed X, where X is equal to the expected value of the current contract In this

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Fred wants to hire Barney to manage his retail store. Barney can apply a high level of effort (at a cost to him of $30), a medium level of effort (at a cost to him of $10), or a low level of effort (at a cost to him of $0). Fred's profits depend not only of the level of Barney's effort but also on the state of consumer demand. Fred believes that demand will be high with probability 50 percent (and therefore demand will be low with probability 50 percent). Fred has determined the following possible profit levels (before paying Barney) will occur depending on Barney's effort and the state of consumer demand: Demand low high effort low 20 40 medium 40 80 high 80 100 Of the choices below, what is the largest percentage range of profit provided to Barney that would ensure Barney would supply high effort? a. any percent greater than 75.00 percent (3/4). b. any percent greater than 66.66 percent (2/3). c. any percent greater than 50.00 percent (1/2).d. any…
The value of a successful project is $420,000; the probabilities of success are 1/2 with good supervision and 1/4 without. The manager is risk neutral, not risk averse as in the text, so his expected utility equals his expected income minus his disutility of effort. He can get other jobs paying $90,000, and his disutility for exerting the extra effort for good supervision on your project is $100,000. (a) Show that inducing high effort would require the firm to offer a compensation scheme with a negative base salary; that is, if the project fails, the manager pays the firm an amount stipulated in the scheme. (b) How might a negative base salary be implemented in reality? (c) Show that if a negative base salary is not feasible, then the firm does better to settle for the low-pay, low-effort situation.
Consider the model of competitive insurance discussed in lectures (Topic 6.7). Peter is a risk averse individual with the utility function u(w) = w0.5. His current wealth is $300 and with probability 1/2 he will incur a loss of D = $240, but with probability 1/2 he will incur no loss. Ann has the same utility u(w) = w0.5 and current wealth $300 as Peter, but a different probability of loss: she will incur a loss of D = $240 with probability 0.1, and no loss with probability 0.9. As we showed in lectures, in the separating equilibrium Peter is offered actuarially fair full insurance contract, so his wealth is equal to $180, whether loss happens or not. Ann will be offered an insurance contract with the amount of insurance (approximately) equal to Group of answer choices 0 16 36 66 120 240
Setup from Question 1) An expected utility maximiser owns a car worth £60 000 and has a bank account with £20 000. The money in the bank is safe, but there is a 50% probability that the car will be stolen. The utility of wealth for the agent is u(y) = In(y) and they have no other assets. Question 2)
The von-Neumann Morgenstern utility function is of the form u(e) - In(e). There is a lottery over consumption outcomes: with probability 0.3, the consumption will be 1 and with probability 0.7 the consumption will be 3; Compute the risk premium (round to 2 decimals).
A widely used utility function in the economics literature is the constant rate of risk aversion utility function. It is given by: utc) = c*(1-n) (1-n) Assume that an agent lives tor three periods (t-0,1,2) and discounts future utity at rate B (per period), The agent is born with asset level ag and his/her labour market income is yo and y, for periods O and 1 respectively, the agent retire in the last period (no labour income). The interest rate in this economy is Please answer the following questions based on the information displayed here. Choose the best option avallable. Select one: O a. The budget constrain in period te2 is given by: C2 + ay = az(1+r) O b. The budget constrain in period te2 is given by: c2= az{1+1) O G. The budget constrain in period t=2 is glven by: ute, )+ ag = a;(1+1) +ya d. The budget constrain in period t=2 is given by: C2= az(1+r) +y3 e. The budget constrain in period te2 is given by: c, + ag = az(1+) +ya
Suppose Alex’s utility function is u ($x) = √x. Assume her initial wealth is 0. Is it possible that Alex’s expected utility from the prospect equals $5, why? What is the possible range of Alex’s expected utility?
Use the utility function u = E (r,) – 0.5 A o, where A is the risk aversion parameter and A = 3.5. Use the average annual return on the S&P 500 as E(r,). Use the average annual interest rate on the US Government 10-year treasury bond over the past decade as r Solve for the investor's optimal allocation between the risky and the risk-free asset.
Sarah has a utility function expressed as the square root of wealth (w). Currently, Sarah has an initial wealth of $2000 and faces a potential loss of $1500 with a loss probability of .15. What is Sarah's expected utility if an insurer charges her a pure (actuarially fair) premium? 63.75 41.37 42.13 225
Consider the following game, with a risk-neutral principal with preferences π = q - w hiring an agent with preferences U = √w-e.. The agent's reservation utility is given by Ū = 2, and the agent can choose between an effort level of 0 or an effort level of 10. Output is either 0 or 400 and follows the following probability distribution, a function of effort level and some uncertain factor: e=0 e=10 Probability (q=0) Probability (q=400) 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.1 What would the contract look like if the principal tried to push the wages when q=0 to zero? Would the principal want to do this? Explain.
Prospect Y = ($6, 0.25 ; $15, 0.75) If Will's utility of wealth function is given by u(x)=x0.25, what is the value of CE(Y) for Will? (In other words, what is Will's certainty equivalent for prospect Y?) (The certainty equivalent represents the maximum amount a person would be willing to pay to acquire a risky prospect, and equivalently, the lowest price for which they would be willing to sell a risky prospect if they already owned it) (Note: The answer may not be a whole number; please round to the nearest hundredth) (Note: The numbers may change between questions, so read carefully)
Priyanka has an income of £90,000 and is a von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility maximiser with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index . There is a 1 % probability that there is flooding damage at her house. The repair of the damage would cost £80,000 which would reduce the income to £10,000. a) Would Priyanka be willing to spend £500 to purchase an insurance policy that would fully insure her against this loss? Explain. b) What would be the highest price (premium) that she would be willing to pay for an insurance policy that fully insures her against the flooding damage?