ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
An economy is operating with an output that is $400 billion dollars below its natural rate of $2000 billion dollars and fiscal policy makers want to close the recessionary gap. The central bank agrees to hold the interest rate constant so there is no crowding out. The marginal propensity to consume is 4/5. In which direction and by how much would the government spending need to change to close the gap? Fully explain your answer and provide a graph that shows the initial situation
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 4 steps with 3 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Suppose real GDP is currently $12.5 trillion and potential real GDP is $13 trillion. If the president and Congress increased government purchases by $500 billion, what would be the result on the economy?arrow_forwardThe government spends an additional $926 billion and the marginal propensity to consume is 66%. How much will GDP increase due to this additional government spending? Enter your answer in billions and round to two decimal places.arrow_forwardSuppose that the MPC is 0.8 and the government spends an extra $10 billion. How much will the aggregate demand curve shift as a result?arrow_forward
- Suppose that real GDP is currently $19.3 trillion, potential GDP is $23.0 trillion, the government purchases multiplier is 1.6, and the tax multiplier is -1.6. Holding other factors (such as prices and interest rates) constant, how will taxes (T) need to change to bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP? Provide your answer in dollars measured in trillions rounded to two decimal places. Use a negative sign for negative changes. Do not include any symbols, such as "S," "," "%," or "," in your answer. Your Answer: Answerarrow_forwardSuppose the economy begins at full employment. Label this starting point as point "1." Then, suppose that a long strike by coal miners reduces the coal supply and increases the price of coal. Show the effects on your graph and label the new equilibrium point "2." Lastly, suppose our government wants the economy to return to full-employment as quickly as possible. Should the government intervene? If so, show the impact of successful fiscal policy on your graph. Label this new equilibrium point "3."arrow_forwardThe marginal propensity to expend is 0.5 and there is a recessionary gap of $200. What fiscal policy would you recommend? (Assume mpe = mpc) 0000 Expansionary fiscal policy; increase government expenditures by $100, or cut taxes by $200. Contractionary fiscal policy; decrease government expenditures by $200, or cut taxes by $100. Contractionary fiscal policy; decrease government expenditures by $100, or cut taxes by $200. Expansionary fiscal policy; increase government expenditures by $200, or cut taxes by $100.arrow_forward
- Suppose actual real GDP is $13.37 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.33 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.62. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its spending to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forwardIf bentham received a $2, 500 bonus and his MPS is 0.20, his consumption rises by $____and his saving rises by $____ A) 2, 500; 20 B) 2, 500: 200 C) 2,000; 500 D) 500; 100arrow_forwardPresident Biden is proposing an increase in the corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%. Although the corporate tax rate will be higher than it is currently, it is still lower than the corporate tax rate of 35% that had been in place since President Clinton. How will this tax increase affect aggregate expenditures, equilibrium GDP and employment? Part of the reason for this proposal is to offset the increased spending from the last three stimulus packages/checks which increased Federal government's debt. Do you agree with the proposed increase in corporate tax rates? Why or why not? What are some of the costs and benefits of the proposed tax changes? Is this the right time to increase taxes? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- Using the AE model, show the economy in equilibrium. Then, show the impact of an increase in government spending to reduce the unemployment rate.Would the above be considered expansionary or contractionary fiscal policy?Assume the change in government spending in above is $25 billion dollars and MPC = .95. What will be the change in GDP?arrow_forwardOn the following graph, AD1 represents the initial aggregate demand curve in a hypothetical economy, and AS represents the initial aggregate supply curve. The economy's full-employment output is $12 trillion. On the following graph, use the grey point (star symbol) to mark the equilibrium. (Note: You will not be graded on any adjustments made to the graph.) PRICE LEVEL (CPI) AS 106 105 104 103 63 102 101 100 99 98 AD AD 吕 1 97 96 Full Employment 96 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 REAL GDP (Trillions of dollars) AD 2 Equilibrium The initial short-run equilibrium level of real GDP is $ trillion, and the initial short-run equilibrium price level is Suppose the government, seeking full employment, borrows money and increases its expenditures by the amount it believes necessary to close thearrow_forwardConsider an economy in which the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75, prices are constant, G is initially 1,500, taxes are autonomous (not related to income) and are initially 2,000, transfer payments are initially 500, and GDP is initially 8,200. The economy is currently experiencing an inflationary gap. The government wishes to eliminate the gap and intends to reduce GDP to 7,000, and is considering changing government purchases, or taxes, or transfer payments. What new levels of these fiscal policy tools would be needed? In each case, what would the new government surplus or deficit be?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education