Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
A researcher compares two compounds (1 and 2) used in the manufacture of car tires that are designed to reduce braking distances for SUVs equipped with the tires. The mean braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires made with compound 1 is 65 feet, with a population standard deviation of 13.6. The mean braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires made with compound 2 is 69 feet, with a population standard deviation of 8.5. Suppose that a sample of 55 braking tests are performed for each compound. Using these results, test the claim that the braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires using compound 1 is shorter than the braking distance when compound 2 is used. Let μ₁ be the true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 1 and μ₂ be the true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 2. Use the 0.05 level of significance. Step 5 of 5: State the conclusion of the hypothesis test. Answer Tables Keypad Keyboard Shortcuts Previous Step Answers There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean braking distance when using compound 1 is shorter than that of compound 2. ○ There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean braking distance when using compound 1 is shorter than that of compound 2.

A researcher compares two compounds (1 and 2) used in the manufacture of car tires that are designed to reduce braking distances for SUVs equipped with the tires. The mean braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires made with compound 1 is 65 feet, with a population standard deviation of 13.6. The mean braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires made with compound 2 is 69 feet, with a population standard deviation of 8.5. Suppose that a sample of 55 braking tests are performed for each compound. Using these results, test the claim that the braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires using compound 1 is shorter than the braking distance when compound 2 is used. Let μ₁ be the true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 1 and μ₂ be the true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 2. Use the 0.05 level of significance. Step 5 of 5: State the conclusion of the hypothesis test. Answer Tables Keypad Keyboard Shortcuts Previous Step Answers There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean braking distance when using compound 1 is shorter than that of compound 2. ○ There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean braking distance when using compound 1 is shorter than that of compound 2.

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.5: Comparing Sets Of Data
Problem 14PPS
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
A researcher compares two compounds (1 and 2) used in the manufacture of car tires that are designed to reduce braking distances for SUVs equipped with the tires. The mean braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires made with compound 1 is 65 feet, with a population standard deviation of 13.6. The mean braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires made with compound 2 is 69 feet, with a population standard deviation of 8.5. Suppose that a sample of 55 braking tests are performed for each compound. Using these results, test the claim that the braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires using compound 1 is shorter than the braking distance when compound 2 is used. Let μ₁ be the true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 1 and μ₂ be the true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 2. Use the 0.05 level of significance. Step 5 of 5: State the conclusion of the hypothesis test. Answer Tables Keypad Keyboard Shortcuts Previous Step Answers There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean braking distance when using compound 1 is shorter than that of compound 2. ○ There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean braking distance when using compound 1 is shorter than that of compound 2.
Transcribed Image Text:A researcher compares two compounds (1 and 2) used in the manufacture of car tires that are designed to reduce braking distances for SUVs equipped with the tires. The mean braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires made with compound 1 is 65 feet, with a population standard deviation of 13.6. The mean braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires made with compound 2 is 69 feet, with a population standard deviation of 8.5. Suppose that a sample of 55 braking tests are performed for each compound. Using these results, test the claim that the braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires using compound 1 is shorter than the braking distance when compound 2 is used. Let μ₁ be the true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 1 and μ₂ be the true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 2. Use the 0.05 level of significance. Step 5 of 5: State the conclusion of the hypothesis test. Answer Tables Keypad Keyboard Shortcuts Previous Step Answers There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean braking distance when using compound 1 is shorter than that of compound 2. ○ There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean braking distance when using compound 1 is shorter than that of compound 2.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 1 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS