Current Attempt in ProgressA company manufactures three products using the same production process. The costs incurred up to the split-off pointare $208,400. These costs are allocated to the products on the basis of their sales value at the split-off point. Thenumber of units produced, the selling prices per unit of the three products at the split-off point and after furtherprocessing, and the additional processing costs are as follows.ProductDEYour answer is partially correct.F(b1)Number ofUnitsProducedIncrementalprofit (loss)4,3505,5301,900Product DSelling Priceat Split-Off$10.10$11.1019.20Selling PriceafterProcessing$15.4016.4023.00Determine the incremental profit (loss) of each product(s). (Enter negative amounts using either a negativesign preceding the number e.g. -45 or parentheses e.g. (45).)Product EAdditionalProcessing Costs$$16,99521,50910,790Product F$

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/f957924b-4e46-49ef-9a3b-70efcf2a0598.jpg

A company manufactures three products using the same production process. The costs incurred up to the split-off point are $208,400. These costs are allocated to the products on the basis of their sales value at the split-off point. The number of units produced, the selling prices per unit of the three products at the split-off point and after further processing, and the additional processing costs are as follows. Product D E F (b1) Number of Units Produced 4,350 5,530 1,900 Selling Price at Split-Off $10.10 11.10 19.20 Selling Price after Processing $15.40 16.40 23.00 Additional Processing Costs $16,995 21,509 10,790 Determine the incremental profit (loss) of each product(s). (Enter negative amounts using either a negative sign preceding the number e.g. -45 or parentheses e.g. (45).)

A company manufactures three products using the same production process. The costs incurred up to the split-off point are $208,400. These costs are allocated to the products on the basis of their sales value at the split-off point. The number of units produced, the selling prices per unit of the three products at the split-off point and after further processing, and the additional processing costs are as follows. Product D E F (b1) Number of Units Produced 4,350 5,530 1,900 Selling Price at Split-Off $10.10 11.10 19.20 Selling Price after Processing $15.40 16.40 23.00 Additional Processing Costs $16,995 21,509 10,790 Determine the incremental profit (loss) of each product(s). (Enter negative amounts using either a negative sign preceding the number e.g. -45 or parentheses e.g. (45).)

Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Series)

4th Edition

ISBN:9781305970663

Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen

Publisher:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen

Chapter7: Allocating Costs Of Support Departments And Joint Products

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10CE: A company manufactures three products, L-Ten, Triol, and Pioze, from a joint process. Each...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Cicleta Manufacturing has four activities: receiving materials, assembly, expediting products, and storing goods. Receiving and assembly are necessary activities; expediting and storing goods are unnecessary. The following data pertain to the four activities for the year ending 20x1 (actual price per unit of the activity driver is assumed to be equal to the standard price): Required: 1. Prepare a cost report for the year ending 20x1 that shows value-added costs, non-value-added costs, and total costs for each activity. 2. Explain why expediting products and storing goods are non-value-added activities. 3. What if receiving cost is a step-fixed cost with each step being 1,500 orders whereas assembly cost is a variable cost? What is the implication for reducing the cost of waste for each activity?
Milo Manufacturing produces products Kappa and Lambda from a joint process. Total joint costs are $169,000. The sales value at split- off was $175,680 for 8.800 units of Kappa and $63,280 for 13,200 units of Lambda. Required: a. What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the net realizable value at split-off approach? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your final answers to the nearest whole dollar amounts. b. What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the physical quantities method? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. a. Net realizable value method b. Physical quantities method Kappa Lambda
Milo Manufacturing produces products Kappa and Lambda from a joint process. Total joint costs are $168,000. The sales value at split-off was $174,960 for 8,400 units of Kappa and $63,280 for 12,600 units of Lambda. Required: What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the net realizable value at split-off approach? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your final answers to the nearest whole dollar amounts. What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the physical quantities method? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Kappa Lambda a. Net realizable value method ??? ??? b. Physical quantities method ??? ???
Milo Manufacturing produces products Kappa and Lambda from a joint process. Total joint costs are $158,000. The sales value at split-off was $167,760 for 4,400 units of Kappa and $63,280 for 6,600 units of Lambda. Required: What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the net realizable value at split-off approach? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your final answers to the nearest whole dollar amounts. What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the physical quantities method? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations.
SAMCIS Company produces three products (X, Y, and Z) in a joint process costing P100,000. The products can be sold as they leave the process, or they can be processed further and sold. The cost accountant has provided you with the following information: Separable Further Processing Costs P60,000 50,000 90,000 Sales Price at Split-Off Sales Price After Product Unit Volume Further Processing 3,000 4,000 8,000 Assume that all processing costs are variable costs. X Y P25 30 P10 15 20 35 Required: Which products should SAMCIS sell at split-off, and which products should be processed further?
Bixel Components manufactures products A1 and A2 from a joint process. Total joint costs are $360,000. The sales value at split-off was $400,000 for 4,500 units of product A1 and $200,000 for 1,400 units of product A2. Required: Assuming that total joint costs are allocated using the net realizable value at split-off approach, what amount of the joint costs was allocated to product A1? (Do not round intermediate calculations.) Joint cost of product A1
Breegle Company produces three products (B-40, J-60, and H-102) from a single process.Breegle uses the physical volume method to allocate joint costs of $22,500 per batch to theproducts. Based on the following information, which product(s) should Breegle continue toprocess after the split-off point in order to maximize profit? B-40 J-60 H-102Physical units produced per batch 1,500 2,000 3,200Market value per unit at split-off $10.00 $4.00 $7.25Cost per unit of further processing after split-off $3.05 $1.00 $2.50Market value per unit after further processing $12.25 $5.70 $9.75 a. B-40 onlyb. J-60 only c. H-102 onlyd. B-40 and H-102 only
DEF Company produces three product (A, B, and C) in a joint process costing 100,000. The products can be sold as they leave the process or they can be processed further and sold. The cost accountant has provided the following information: Product Unit Volume Sales prices at split-off Separable further processing costs sales price after further processing A 3000 10 60000 25 B 4000 15 50000 30 C 8000 20 90000 35 Assume that all processing costs are variable costs. Which products should DEF Company sell at split-off, and which products should be processed further?
CARAMEL Inc. manufactures three joint products. The following production data were provided by CARAMEL Inc. for the current period: Product Name Units Produced X Y Z Joint product costs for the current period were as follows: Raw materials Direct labor Factory overhead Costs before separation Costs after separation: X 1,000 2,000 3,000 The company uses the net realizable value method for allocating joint costs. 8. What is the Gross profit/(loss) on the sale of all X products? Y Z Production for April, in pounds: Z Additional Processing Final Selling Price Cost after Split Off 9. What is the total gross profit (loss) on the sale of all the joint products? MACCHIATO Company produces two main products jointly. X and Y. and Z. which is a by- product of Y. X and Y are produced from the same raw material. Z is manufactured from the residue of the process creating Y. Sales for April: Costs before separation are apportioned between the two main products by the net realizable value method. The…
Corey Corporation manufactures joint products W and X. During a recent period, joint costs amounted to $450,000 in the production of 20,000 gallons of W and 50,000 gallons of X. Both products will be processed beyond the split-off point, giving rise to the following data: Separable processing costs Sales price (per gallon) if processed beyond split-off The joint cost allocated to W under the net-realizable-value method would be: (Do not round intermediate calculations.) Multiple Choice $156,000. $142,105, $110,000 $128.571. $40,000 $ 15 $ $160,000 13
Beta Company manufactures Products Tama and Mali from a joint process. The sales value at split-off point was P36,000 for 6,000 units of Product Tama and P24,000 for 2,000 units of Product Mali. Assuming that the portion of the total joint cost properly allocated to product Tama using the sales value at split-off point method was P30,000, what is the total joint cost? a. P40,000 b. P50,000 c. P60,000 d. P90,000
A company manufactures two joint products at a joint cost of 1,000. These products can be sold at split-off, or when further processed at an additional cost, sold as higher quality items. The decision to sell at split-off or further process should be based on the: A. allocation of the 1,000 joint cost using the quantitative unit measure B. assumption that the 1,000 joint cost is irrelevant C. allocation of the $1,000 joint cost using the relative sales value approach D. assumption that the 1,000 joint cost must be allocated using a physical-measure approach E. allocation of the 1,000 joint cost using any equitable and rational allocation basis