85 Fingerprint expertise. A study published in Psychological Science (August 2011) tested the accuracy of experts and novices in identifying fingerprints. Participants were pre- sented pairs of fingerprints and asked to judge whether the prints in each pair matched. The pairs were presented under three different conditions: prints from the same in- dividual (match condition), nonmatching but similar prints (similar distracter condition), and nonmatching and very dissimilar prints (nonsimilar distracter condition). The per- centages of correct decisions made by the two groups un- der each of the three conditions are listed in the table. Condition Match Similar Distracter Nonsimilar Distracter Fingerprint Experts 92.12% 99.32% 100% Novices 74.55% 44.82% 77.03% Source: Based on J. M. Tangen, M. B. Thompson, and D. J. McCarthy, "Identifying Fingerprint Expertise," Psychological Science, Vol. 22, No. 8, August 2011 (Figure 1). a. Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probability that an expert failed to identify the match? b. Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probability that a novice failed to identify the match? c. Assume the study included 10 participants, 5 experts and 5 novices. Suppose that a pair of matched prints was presented to a randomly selected study participant and the participant failed to identify the match. Is the participant more likely to be an expert or a novice?
85 Fingerprint expertise. A study published in Psychological Science (August 2011) tested the accuracy of experts and novices in identifying fingerprints. Participants were pre- sented pairs of fingerprints and asked to judge whether the prints in each pair matched. The pairs were presented under three different conditions: prints from the same in- dividual (match condition), nonmatching but similar prints (similar distracter condition), and nonmatching and very dissimilar prints (nonsimilar distracter condition). The per- centages of correct decisions made by the two groups un- der each of the three conditions are listed in the table. Condition Match Similar Distracter Nonsimilar Distracter Fingerprint Experts 92.12% 99.32% 100% Novices 74.55% 44.82% 77.03% Source: Based on J. M. Tangen, M. B. Thompson, and D. J. McCarthy, "Identifying Fingerprint Expertise," Psychological Science, Vol. 22, No. 8, August 2011 (Figure 1). a. Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probability that an expert failed to identify the match? b. Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probability that a novice failed to identify the match? c. Assume the study included 10 participants, 5 experts and 5 novices. Suppose that a pair of matched prints was presented to a randomly selected study participant and the participant failed to identify the match. Is the participant more likely to be an expert or a novice?
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 13PT
Related questions
Question
Need explanation
Transcribed Image Text:185 Fingerprint expertise. A study published in Psychological
Science (August 2011) tested the accuracy of experts and
novices in identifying fingerprints. Participants were pre-
sented pairs of fingerprints and asked to judge whether
the prints in each pair matched. The pairs were presented
under three different conditions: prints from the same in-
dividual (match condition), nonmatching but similar prints
(similar distracter condition), and nonmatching and very
dissimilar prints (nonsimilar distracter condition). The per-
centages of correct decisions made by the two groups un-
der each of the three conditions are listed in the table.
Condition
Match
Similar
Distracter
Nonsimilar
Distracter
Fingerprint
Experts
92.12%
99.32%
100%
Novices
74.55%
44.82%
77.03%
Source: Based on J. M. Tangen, M. B. Thompson, and D. J. McCarthy,
"Identifying Fingerprint Expertise," Psychological Science, Vol. 22, No. 8,
August 2011 (Figure 1).
a. Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probability
that an expert failed to identify the match?
b. Given a pair of matched prints, what is the probability
that a novice failed to identify the match?
c. Assume the study included 10 participants, 5 experts
and 5 novices. Suppose that a pair of matched prints
was presented to a randomly selected study participant
and the participant failed to identify the match. Is the
participant more likely to be an expert or a novice?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
