5. Common resources versus private goodsSpring is here, and Gilberto and his uncle would like to gofishing for the weekend in New Hampshire. Gilberto couldeither go to the river in town where anyone can fish withouta permit, or he could drive up to a pond located on hisPRIVATEPROPERTYfamily's property in the countryside to fish. Assume that, nomatter where people fish, all of the fish that are caughtwould be kept (that is, there is no "catch and release"policy).The fish in the river are consideredandwhereas the fish in the private pond arev and. In other words, the fish in the river are an example ofandthe fish in the private pond are an example ofFishing in the river will likely lead tobecause of which of the following reasons?O Nobody will enjoy fishing because of the lack of private contributions to the maintenance of the river.O Anyone can fish in the river, and one person's fishing activity decreases the ability of someone else to fish with success.O All fishermen will choose to fish in the river because of the limited access to the pond.O All fishermen will choose to fish in the pond believing that there are more fish there.

Excludable: When it is possible for the owner of the property or a user of goods to prevent the use…

5. Common resources versus private goods Spring is here, and Gilberto and his unde would like to go fishing for the weekend in New Hampshire. Gilberto could either go to the river in town where anyone can fish without a permit, or he could drive up to a pond located on his PRIVATE PROPERTY family's property in the countryside to fish. Assume that, no matter where people fish, all of the fish that are caught would be kept (that is, there is no "catch and release" policy). The fish in the river are considered and whereas the fish in the private pond are . In other words, the fish in the river are an example of and and the fish in the private pond are an example of Fishing in the river will likely lead to because of which of the following reasons?

5. Common resources versus private goods Spring is here, and Gilberto and his unde would like to go fishing for the weekend in New Hampshire. Gilberto could either go to the river in town where anyone can fish without a permit, or he could drive up to a pond located on his PRIVATE PROPERTY family's property in the countryside to fish. Assume that, no matter where people fish, all of the fish that are caught would be kept (that is, there is no "catch and release" policy). The fish in the river are considered and whereas the fish in the private pond are . In other words, the fish in the river are an example of and and the fish in the private pond are an example of Fishing in the river will likely lead to because of which of the following reasons?

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091992

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter11: Public Goods And Common Resources

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4QR

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Four roommates are planning to spend the weekendin their dorm room watching old movies, and theyare debating how many to watch. Here is theirwillingness to pay for each film:Dwayne Javier Salman ChrisFirst film $7 $5 $3 $2Second film 6 4 2 1Third film 5 3 1 0Fourth film 4 2 0 0Fifth film 3 1 0 0a. Within the dorm room, is the showing of a moviea public good? Why or why not?b. If it costs $8 to stream a movie, how many moviesshould the roommates stream to maximize totalsurplus?c. If they choose the optimal number from part (b)and then split the cost of streaming the moviesequally, how much surplus does each personobtain from watching the movies?d. Is there any way to split the cost to ensure thateveryone benefits? What practical problems doesthis solution raise?e. Suppose they agree in advance to choose theefficient number and to split the cost of the moviesequally. When Dwayne is asked his willingness topay, will he have an incentive to tell the truth? Ifso, why? If not, what will he…
. Both Wisconsin and Illinois border Lake Michigan. The lake is becoming polluted and both states are deciding whether or not to clean it. If Wisconsin decides to clean the lake it will cost 1200 and generate social benefits of 1500 – however, Wisconsin will receive only 1100 of those social benefits while neighbor Illinois will receive the other 400. If Illinois cleans the lake, it will cost them 700 and generate social benefits of 900 – however, Illinois will receive only 600 of those benefits, Wisconsin will receive the remaining 300. If a state does not clean the lake, it experiences a cost of $0. If both states clean the lake, the payoffs will be A. Wisconsin gains 100, Illinois gains 200B. Wisconsin gains 200, Illinois gains 300C. Wisconsin gains 200, Illinois loses 100D. Wisconsin gains 100, Illinois loses 100
A certain economy consibt ing of the two sectors of goods and servicessupports a defense system that consumes $90 billion wort h of goods and$20 billion worth of services from the economy but does not contributeto economic production. Suppose that 50 cents worth of goods and 20cents worth of services are required to produce $1 wort h of goods andthat 30 cents worth of goods and 60 cents worth of services are requiredto produce $1 wort h of services. ·what must the total output of theeconomic system be to support this defense system?
3. Voluntary contributions toward a public goodLarry and Raphael are considering contributing toward the creation of a public park. Each can choose whether to contribute $400 to the public park or to keep that $400 for a new suit.Since a public park is a public good, both Larry and Raphael will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.80 of benefit. For example, if both Larry and Raphael choose to contribute, then a total of $800 would be contributed to the public park. So, Larry and Raphael would each receive $640 of benefit from the public park, and their combined benefit would be $1,280. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table.Since a new suit is a private good, if Larry chooses to spend $400 on a new suit, Larry would get $400 of benefit from the new suit and Raphael wouldn't receive any benefit from Larry's choice. If Larry still spends $400 on a new suit and…
4. Four roommates are planning to spend the weekend in their dorm suite watching old olent atsomos movies, and they are debating how many to watch. The table below contains their willingness to pay for each film. 1st film 2nd film 3rd film 4th film 5th film John $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 Paul $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 an rud bas Vedda nowoc 2102 gulden et 150 yebesnbew sho George $3 $2 $1 $0 $0 (nast il qalihe: 0 sx sig Ringo og $2 $1 $0 $0 $0 Taboog dikdug dan one dorld amasi obivond themsvog srl: asobydw 20607 1610A (b 2)99712 vdio (9 it sins 0.6 d. Is there any way to split the cost so that everyone benefits? What problems arise with this plan?
Imagine a scenic canyon, visited by many local people as well as tourists from beyondthe local area. Consider a scenario in which a mining company has proposed to the localauthority that it be closed to the public and put into the production of coal. Thinking interms of economics as a way of adjudicating the relative value of one use of the canyon overthe other, what would you need to know in order to make a comparison or assessment?What kinds of quantitative data would inform your decision, and where might they comefrom? What kinds of things might you need to know that are hard to measure? Once youhave listed the kinds of information and data that might be available to inform this decision, do you think it would be sufficient to making this decision, why or why not?
Side 35 Suppose that 10,000 people are willing to spend a maximum of $20 each to preserve one acre of rainforest. A conservation group mails out a request to each person asking him or her to mail in $40 to preserve one acre of rainforest. How many acres of rainforest will be preserved with this program? Vælg én svarmulighed O 20,000 acres O Zero acres O 10,000 acres O 5,000 acres
2. Suppose that emissions of sulfur dioxide are managed via a Cap-and-Trade policy. In this circumstance, how can an environmental group, such as Greenpeace, reduce emissions of this pollutant? Explain your answer. How would it effectively result in a reduction in emissions? What is the main obstacle for Greenpeace to achieve this? 3. Explain why a Cap-and-Trade program is more likely to be efficient than a standard. Be specific. 4. Explain why the firm’s MAC-curve is its demand curve for pollution permits.
53. The Indiana University basketball team trails by twopoints with eight seconds to go and has the ball. Shouldit attempt a two-point shot or a three-point shot?Assume that the Indiana shot will end the game and thatno foul will occur on the shot. Assume that a three-pointshot has a 30% chance of success, and atwo-point shot has a 55% chance of success. Finally,assume that Indiana has a 55% chance of winning inovertime.
4 An increase in per capita production and incomes can be expected to have a large effect in reducing emissions that lead to global warming. O false O true
4 Jill and Jack both have two pails that can be used to carry water down from a hill. Each makes only one trip down the hill, and each pail of water can be sold for $5. Carrying the pails of water down requires considerable effort. Both Jill and Jack would be willing to pay $4 each to avoid carrying one pail down the hill, and an additional $4 to avoid carrying a second pail down the hill. nt a. If Jack and Jill each must decide whether to carry one or two pails of water down from the top of the hill, how many pails will each child choose to carry? pail(s) b. Jill and Jack's parents are worried that the two children don't cooperate enough with one another. Suppose they make Jill and Jack share equally their revenues from selling the water. Given that both are self-interested, construct the payoff matrix for the decisions Jill and Jack face regarding the number of pails of water each should carry. Instructions: In the payoff matrix below, enter the payoffs for each child for each…
5. Common resources versus private goods Spring is here, and Brian and his grandfather would like to go fishing for the weekend in Vermont. Brian could either go to the river in town where anyone can fish without a permit, or he could drive up to a pond located on his family's property PRIVATE PROPERTY in the countryside to fish. Assume that, no matter where people fish, all of the fish that are caught would be kept (that is, there is no "catch and release" policy).