4. Suppose that there is a negotiation between two players over a painting. Person 1, the seller, has no interest in the painting. On the other hand the painting is worth $100 to the buyer. If the painting is sold at a price in between 0 and 100, both are better off. Player 1 proposes a price p to player 2. Then, after observing player 1's offer, player 2 decides whether to accept it or to reject it. If the offer is rejected both get zero and the game ends. Find the unique SPNE of this game.

4. Suppose that there is a negotiation between two players over a painting. Person 1, the seller, has no interest in the painting. On the other hand the painting is worth $100 to the buyer. If the painting is sold at a price in between 0 and 100, both are better off. Player 1 proposes a price p to player 2. Then, after observing player 1's offer, player 2 decides whether to accept it or to reject it. If the offer is rejected both get zero and the game ends. Find the unique SPNE of this game.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Return to the game between Monica and Nancy in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Assume that Monica and Nancy choose their effort levels sequentially instead of simultaneously. Monica commits to her choice of effort level first. On observing this decision, Nancy commits to her own effort level. What is the subgame - perfect equilibrium of the game where the joint profits are 5m + 4n+ mn, the costs of their efforts to Monica and Nancy are m2 and n2, respectively, and Monica commits to an effort level first? Compare the payoffs to Monica and Nancy with those found in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Does this game have a first-mover or second - mover advantage? Using the same joint profit function as in part (a), find the subgame - perfect equilibrium for the game where Nancy must commit first to an effort level. U10. Return to the game between Monica and Nancy in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Assume that Monica and Nancy choose their effort levels sequentially instead of simultaneously. Monica commits…
There is a first-priced auction where 3 players value object at v1=v2=90 and v3=70. Player with highest bid wins object and pays own bid. Player i's payoff is vi-bi. When there is a tie, winner is player with smallest number (ex. player 2 wins if ties with player 3). 1) Is (90,90,70) a Nash equilibrium? 2) Can player 3 win in a Nash equilibrium if it was second-price auction?
If a player does not have a dominant strategy, can the game still have a Nash equilibrium? No. At least one player must have a dominant strategy for the outcome to be a Nash equilibrium. Yes. There is no need for a dominant strategy to exist in order to have a Nash equilibrium. The outcome is a Nash equilibrium because each player has made his or her optimal choice based on the optimal choice of the other player. No. If there is no dominant strategy, there is no predictable outcome and therefore no Nash equilibrium. Yes. A Nash equilibrium is possible only if neither player has a dominant strategy. If a dominant strategy exists, it is no longer a Nash equilibrium.
Jane is interested in buying a car from a used car dealer. Her maximum willingness to pay for thecar is 12 ($12,000). Bo, the dealer, is willing to sell the car as long as he receives at least 9($9,000). What is the Nash bargaining solution to this game?
6
3. For the friend-foe game, recall that there were 3 Nash equilibria possible, but the equilibria set didn't include the cooperative outcome, for which both players would win. Friend Foe Friend | 500,500 0,1000 Foe 1000,0 0,0 a) If the game is played repeatedly, propose a play strategy that will enforce cooperation. For what values of ô (discount factor) the equilibrium will be (Friend, Friend)?
2
Suppose that, in an ultimatum game, the proposer may not propose less than $1 nor fractional amounts, and therefore must propose $1, $2, …, or $10 (see image attached below). The responder must Accept (A) or Reject (R). Suppose, first, that this game is played by two egoists, for whom u(x,y)=x. Find all subgame-perfect equilibria in this game. Suppose, second, that this game is played by two altruists, for whom u(x,y) = ⅔(x)1/2 + ⅓(y)1/2. Find all subgame-perfect equilibria in this game.
3. Two individuals are involved in a synergistic relationship. If both individuals devote more effort to the relationship, they are both better off. Specifically, an effort level is a nonnegative number, and player 1's payoff function is e₁(1+€₂-e₁), where ei is player i's effort level. For player 2 the cost of effort is either the same as that of player 1, and hence her payoff function is given by e2(1+e₁ - e₂), or effort is very costly for her in which case her payoff function is given by e₂(1 + e₁ — 2e2). 1 Player 2 knows player 1's payoff function and whether the cost of effort is high for herself or not. Player 1, however, is uncertain about player 2's cost of effort. He believes that the cost of effort is low with probability p, and high with probability 1 - p, where 0 < p < 1. Find the Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this game as a function of p.
Consider a new card game between 2 players: Jim (player 1) and Kelly (player 2) Jim is dealt two cards : 09 and 49. Kelly is also dealt two cards: 06 and 4. Now, each of the players will play 1 card both at the same time. The payoff of Jim is 1 points if he plays a card of opposite color (red/black) than Kelly, and otherwise his payoff is 7 points. The payoff of Kelly is 5 points if the difference of the already played card numbers is greater than 6, otherwise her payoff is 8 points. 1. Find the action sets of each player and the action profile of the game. 2. Represent the game in the Normal form. 3. Find the Best Responses for Jim. 4. Find the Best Responses for Kelly. 5. Find all the Nash Equilibriums of the game (if any).
2. Consider the following "centipede game." The game starts with player 1 choosing be- tween terminate (T) and continue (C). If player 1 chooses C, the game proceeds with player 2 choosing between terminate (t) and continue (c). The two players choose be- tween terminate and continue in turn if the other player chooses continue until the terminal nodes with (player l's payoff, player 2's payoff) are reached as shown below. TTTT Player 1 Player 2 Player 1 Player 2 (3, 3) t (1, 1) (0, 3) (2, 2) (1, 4) (a) List all possible strategies of each player. (b) Transform the game tree into a normal-form matrix representation. (c) Find all pure-strategy Nash equilibria. (d) Find the unique pure-strategy subgame-perfect equilibrium.
Suppose that the proposer in the ultimatum game may not propose fractional amounts, and therefore must propose $0, $1, $2, ..., or $10 (see figure below). As always, the responder must Accept (A) or Reject (R). Suppose that this game is played by two egoists who care only about their money. Which of the following statements are true? (Multiple Choice) XXX $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 || $8 $9 $10 A R ($6,$4) ($0,$0) A. Player 2's threat to reject a low offer is not credible; player 1 anticipates this and offers nothing. B. The Nash equilibrium is: Player 2 accepts no offers and Player 1 offers nothing. C. The Nash equilibrium is: Player 2 accepts all offers and Player 1 offers nothing. D. When played with real-world subjects, few people actually play the Nash strategy.