hi can you please answer 3 thank you 3. Consider the two phrases "fail to reject the null hypothesis" vs. “accept the null hypothesis." If youthink about them carefully, these two phrases are very similar. Yet the second is something we never do –we never choose “accept the null hypothesis" as one of the outcomes. Why not?Hint: it may help to use courtroom language instead. In that case, you should discuss the differencebetween declaring someone “not guilty" and declaring them "innocent."4. Unfortunately it is impossible to avoid makingyou will end up tending to make one of the two possible errors more often than the other.a) By making the null hypothesis the default assumption, which error do you think is more likely to occurwhen hypothesis testing – Type I or Type II? Explain briefly.ors, and depending on how you :up your system,b) Our legal system is set up very similarly to hypothesis testing – by making presumption of innocencethe default, we have decided that it is worth sometimes letting a guilty person go free in favor of tryingour best not to convict innocent people. The alternative would be to have a bias toward conviction, so thatwe convicted every guilty person but also quite often convicted innocent people too.Discuss this. Give me your opinion on which error is more dangerous to make and which system worksbetter, in your opinion.

A null hypothesis states that there is no difference between two measurable events or that there is…

3. Consider the two phrases "fail to reject the null hypothesis" vs. "accept the null hypothesis." If you think about them carefully, these two phrases are very similar. Yet the second is something we never do – we never choose "accept the null hypothesis" as one of the outcomes. Why not? Hint: it may help to use courtroom language instead. In that case, you should discuss the difference between declaring someone "not guilty" and declaring them "innocent."

3. Consider the two phrases "fail to reject the null hypothesis" vs. "accept the null hypothesis." If you think about them carefully, these two phrases are very similar. Yet the second is something we never do – we never choose "accept the null hypothesis" as one of the outcomes. Why not? Hint: it may help to use courtroom language instead. In that case, you should discuss the difference between declaring someone "not guilty" and declaring them "innocent."

Calculus For The Life Sciences

2nd Edition

ISBN:9780321964038

Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.

Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.

Chapter12: Probability

Section12.3: Conditional Probability; Independent Events; Bayes' Theorem

Problem 39E: The following problem submitted by Daniel Hahn of Blairstown, Iowa, appeared in the Ask Marilyn...

See similar textbooks