10. Which of the following cases are cited in Pomarantz v. Comm, 62 AFTR 2d 88-5882 (860 F2d 960), (CA9) 11/07/1988? a. Meiers v. Commissioner b. Smith v. Commissioner C. Thompson v. Commissioner d. All of the above

Skip and Jack are the shareholders of the Blue Fish Event Corporation. Skip and Jack regularly put on classy events on or near the beach, so they have a special insurance policy to protect their assets. Business has been slow as fewer large beach weddings are taking place, so Skip and Jack use a large fan to blow down and damage most of their décor assets, some of which were personal assets of Skip and Jack, to collect the insurance benefits. (a) Assuming their acts are proven, will a court allow Skip and Jack to recover the insurance money? (b) Is this a situation where the corporate veil may be pierced? Why or why not? (c) What would it mean for Skip and Jack if the corporate veil is pierced in this situation?

What is the orbita dicta in hoyts v spencer case 1919.

og for J and K are married and have severall children. 3 is the primary benedory on Ke Mestiental Death and Deasement (AD) pelley and shing, the contingent beneficiary K, and I are involved in a train accident, and Kandare ed instantly. The dental death benes will se pot OA L's estate OB. K's estate OC OD and K's edu Jarily

What did Stephen, Mason and Jacob JJ hold in respect of DTR Nominee's claim against Mona Homes in DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423? Choose one of the following  Mona Homes had not repudiated the contract because their purported termination of the contract was based on a correct interpretation of it and DTR Nominees was not, at that time, ready, will and able to perform the contract. Mona Homes had repudiated the contract but DTR Nominees could not terminate because it was not, at that time, ready, willing and able to perform the contract. Mona Homes had repudiated the contract and DTR Nominees had the right to terminate. Mona Homes had not repudiated the contract because their purported termination of the contract was based on a correct interpretation of it, but they had seriously breached an intermediate term.

What are County Courts?

What is the rules established under the case law of Buckley & Young Ltd v CIR (1978) 3 NZTC 61,271 (CA)?

In which decision was it held that an employer may permit women to wear long hair while males are not permitted to have hair below the collar?   a) A.F.S.C.M.E. v. State of Washington   b) Spalding v. University of Washington   c) County of Washington v. Gunther   d) Willingham v. Macon Tel. Publishing Co.

If the decedent owned property in other states, a separate, __________ probate might have to be opened-and a personal representative appointed—in each of those states.   Multiple Choice leasehold contemporaneous statutory ancillary   Sandy incurred a massive debt in medical expenses owed to a local hospital. She simply did not have the assets or income to pay the bill. Therefore, she contacted the hospital and requested a reduction in the bill, a payment plan and the opportunity to work off part of the bill by working at the hospital cafeteria. The hospital agreed. This is an example of a(n)   Multiple Choice Judicial levy Workout Credit hearing Mediation   A workout method that generates revenue with new innovations and modifying the company’s image or mission is   Multiple Choice Renewal Replacement Retrenchment Repositioning

True-False and Multiple Choice Questions. 1. A trial de novo is a trial with new discovery, testimony, and evidence.2. If th Delaware Court of Common Pleas (a general trail court and court of record) makes a common law decision, that decision becomes precedent for all Delaware courts.3. Primary methods of alternative dispute resolution include litigation, mediation and arbitration.4. Delivering the complaint and attached summons to the defendant establishes in personam judgment for the court,5. Sandra sued her employer, Cape Inc., claiming that she was wrongfully terminated from her is a criminal lawsuit.6. The jury decides the law and the judge decides the facts.7. The categorical imperative approach to ethical decision making is to ask the following question “which alternative causes the greatest good (or least harm) to the most people?”8. A summons is a paper ordering a defendant to answer a complaint within a certain time.9. According to the…