SUGAR (Millions of pounds) 2 16 14 12 10 8 PPC 2 4 6 8 Candonia 10 12 16 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) Consumption After Trade The following graph shows the same PPC for Sylvania as before, as well as its initial consumption at point A. As you did for Candonia, place a black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate Sylvania's consumption after trade. SUGAR (Millions of pounds) 2 16 14 12 PPC 10 8 0 4 Sylvania 10 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) Consumption After Trade True or False: Without engaging in international trade, Candonia and Sylvania would not have been able to consume at the after-trade consumption bundles. (Hint: In answering this question, you may wish to refer to your previous answers.) True False 1. Specialization and trade A country may specialize in the production of a good that it can produce at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partners. Because of this comparative advantage, countries benefit when they specialize and trade with each other. The following graphs show the production possibilities curves (PPCs) for Candonia and Sylvania. Both countries produce grain and sugar, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 6 million pounds of grain and 3 million pounds of sugar, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. SUGAR (Millions of pounds) 16 14 12 10 2 PPC Candonia 0 0 2 4 8 10 14 16 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) SUGAR (Millions of pounds) 16 14 10 2 ༄ བྷ་ཥ༅་ཚ་。་“་ཨ 。 Sylvania PPC Slope: -1.5 X-Intercept: 8.00 Y-Intercept: 12.00 0 2 12 14 16 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) Candonia has a comparative advantage in the production of production of while Sylvania has a comparative advantage in the . Suppose that Candonia and Sylvania specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of million pounds of grain and sugar. million pounds of Suppose that Candonia and Sylvania agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparative advantage. The countries decide to exchange 4 million pounds of grain for 4 million pounds of sugar. This ratio of goods is sometimes referred to as the terms of trade between two countries. In this case the two countries are Candonia and Sylvania. The following graph shows the same PPC for Candonia as before, as well as its initial consumption at point A. Place a black point (plus symbol) on the graph to indicate Candonia's consumption after trade. Note: Dashed drop lines will automatically extend to both axes. 16 Candonia +
SUGAR (Millions of pounds) 2 16 14 12 10 8 PPC 2 4 6 8 Candonia 10 12 16 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) Consumption After Trade The following graph shows the same PPC for Sylvania as before, as well as its initial consumption at point A. As you did for Candonia, place a black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate Sylvania's consumption after trade. SUGAR (Millions of pounds) 2 16 14 12 PPC 10 8 0 4 Sylvania 10 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) Consumption After Trade True or False: Without engaging in international trade, Candonia and Sylvania would not have been able to consume at the after-trade consumption bundles. (Hint: In answering this question, you may wish to refer to your previous answers.) True False 1. Specialization and trade A country may specialize in the production of a good that it can produce at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partners. Because of this comparative advantage, countries benefit when they specialize and trade with each other. The following graphs show the production possibilities curves (PPCs) for Candonia and Sylvania. Both countries produce grain and sugar, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 6 million pounds of grain and 3 million pounds of sugar, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A. SUGAR (Millions of pounds) 16 14 12 10 2 PPC Candonia 0 0 2 4 8 10 14 16 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) SUGAR (Millions of pounds) 16 14 10 2 ༄ བྷ་ཥ༅་ཚ་。་“་ཨ 。 Sylvania PPC Slope: -1.5 X-Intercept: 8.00 Y-Intercept: 12.00 0 2 12 14 16 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) Candonia has a comparative advantage in the production of production of while Sylvania has a comparative advantage in the . Suppose that Candonia and Sylvania specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of million pounds of grain and sugar. million pounds of Suppose that Candonia and Sylvania agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparative advantage. The countries decide to exchange 4 million pounds of grain for 4 million pounds of sugar. This ratio of goods is sometimes referred to as the terms of trade between two countries. In this case the two countries are Candonia and Sylvania. The following graph shows the same PPC for Candonia as before, as well as its initial consumption at point A. Place a black point (plus symbol) on the graph to indicate Candonia's consumption after trade. Note: Dashed drop lines will automatically extend to both axes. 16 Candonia +
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)
8th Edition
ISBN:9781337091985
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw
Chapter3: Interdependence And The Gains Rrom Trade
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 6PA
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:SUGAR (Millions of pounds)
2
16
14
12
10
8
PPC
2
4
6
8
Candonia
10
12
16
GRAIN (Millions of pounds)
Consumption After Trade
The following graph shows the same PPC for Sylvania as before, as well as its initial consumption at point A.
As you did for Candonia, place a black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate Sylvania's consumption after trade.
SUGAR (Millions of pounds)
2
16
14
12
PPC
10
8
0
4
Sylvania
10
GRAIN (Millions of pounds)
Consumption After Trade
True or False: Without engaging in international trade, Candonia and Sylvania would not have been able to consume at the after-trade consumption
bundles. (Hint: In answering this question, you may wish to refer to your previous answers.)
True
False
Transcribed Image Text:1. Specialization and trade
A country may specialize in the production of a good that it can produce at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partners. Because of this
comparative advantage, countries benefit when they specialize and trade with each other.
The following graphs show the production possibilities curves (PPCs) for Candonia and Sylvania. Both countries produce grain and sugar, each initially
(i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 6 million pounds of grain and 3 million pounds of sugar, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the
letter A.
SUGAR (Millions of pounds)
16
14
12
10
2
PPC
Candonia
0
0
2
4
8
10
14 16
GRAIN (Millions of pounds)
SUGAR (Millions of pounds)
16
14
10
2
༄ བྷ་ཥ༅་ཚ་。་“་ཨ 。
Sylvania
PPC
Slope: -1.5
X-Intercept: 8.00
Y-Intercept: 12.00
0
2
12
14
16
GRAIN (Millions of pounds)
Candonia has a comparative advantage in the production of
production of
while Sylvania has a comparative advantage in the
. Suppose that Candonia and Sylvania specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a
comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of
million pounds of grain and
sugar.
million pounds of
Suppose that Candonia and Sylvania agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparative
advantage. The countries decide to exchange 4 million pounds of grain for 4 million pounds of sugar. This ratio of goods is sometimes referred to as
the terms of trade between two countries. In this case the two countries are Candonia and Sylvania.
The following graph shows the same PPC for Candonia as before, as well as its initial consumption at point A. Place a black point (plus symbol) on the
graph to indicate Candonia's consumption after trade.
Note: Dashed drop lines will automatically extend to both axes.
16
Candonia
+
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 5 images
Recommended textbooks for you
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours…
Economics
ISBN:
9781337091985
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781337091992
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours…
Economics
ISBN:
9781337091985
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781337091992
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506725
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506893
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506756
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning