Will the Environment Heal Itself?
The environment will heal itself, all right, but humans should worry how. The population explosion is causing damage at a faster rate than the earth's ability to recover, and the damage threatens to become permanent. Furthermore, when an expanding population meets shrinking resources, the results are starvation, poorer health and pitched competition for survival. Among other resources, the world has reached its limit in crop harvests, and is declining in animal species, rain forests, top soil, fish stocks, and fresh water.
There are two types of damage that humans cause to the environment. One is long-term, even permanent destruction, such as the extinction of a species or the
…show more content…
1998 11
7 billion est. 2009 11
8 billion est. 2021 12
9 billion est. 2035 14
10 billion est. 2054 19
11 billion est. 2093 39
At present, we are adding the population of China to this planet every decade. Feeding and supplying this population explosion are placing huge demands on the environment. And this brings us to the other, opposing trend: the environment's resources are either reaching their limit or shrinking. The result will be like two trains barreling towards each other on the same railroad track. Biologists, historians and economists all concur that whenever growing populations have met shrinking resources, the results have been pitched competition for survival. This is why the above chart sees population growth slowing over the next century.
The population explosion is compelling a growing number of scientists to advocate replacing our growth economy with a sustained economy. Lester Brown, President of Worldwatch Institute, writes:
Among the principles of sustainability are the following: Over the long term, species extinction cannot exceed
The human population has caused many environmental problems but
The article by Bambury echoes the scientists warning that human beings should stop destroying the environment citing that it will adversely affect their survival. The article states that humans are stewards of the planet Earth and if they destroy it, they will bring misery to themselves. Besides, the study criticizes humans terming them as a species that may phase out other forms of life out of the planet Earth.
This article argues the many different types of negative effects humans can have on theenvironment. Each type of habitat destruction is explained and provided fact to show theamounts of change. This article comes from a trusted
These changes are damaging the environment causing droughts, rising sea levels, tropical diseases threating wildlife, agricultural production and extinction of some animals as well as putting our health and life style at rick.
In Section 1 of the Nicholson and Wapner text, Species Unbound: Humanity’s Environmental Impact, the authors debate whether humanity’s collapse is inevitable, or whether humans may yet find ways to limit their own growth and survive, even thrive. Is humanity’s collapse inevitable? In your answer, be sure to mention at least 3 of the following: the Anthropocene, the role of cities, the role of agriculture, and/or the concept of ‘planetary boundaries’ (i.e. ‘biocapacity’).
Over the past couple of years, humans have managed to alter our landscape in various ways. As our population and sense of creation increases, we get the urge to expand our living and build up new technology alongside with it. Although this gradual change seems like a natural path for us to take, it also poses as a great threat. We are rapidly using all of our resources and by doing so, we continue to harm the environment in which we live in and also for future generations to come. If it wasn’t actions such as President Ulysses S. Grant signing for Yellow Stone to be the first national park or the Wilderness Act in 1964( NTL PARKS VIDEO); Our environment as we know it today, will not have some of its beautiful wilderness or protected areas that
An incredible amount of species are extinct due to human activity. Some individuals (not all), care more about their health than their surroundings. But the funny thing about this is that there is a relactionship between us and the environment. If we damage nature, we are eventually damaging ourselves.
One human factor to environmental problems is the human population. A large population requires a lot of the environments resources and land, putting an incredible strain on the Earth (Gerber and Macionis 2012). If the Earth is over populated, and
Humans have altered the face of earth more than any other species, and the pace of change is only growing. Our most conspicuous influence is on land, where 80 percent of Earth’s surface has been affected by human activity. We’ve left our mark on nature and animals as well. As humans, we do things that destroy the lives of animals, whether on purpose or on accident.
Looking at data from the past 20 years, it can clearly be seen that the Earth is beginning to decline at an exponential rate. According to Bec Crew, “Over the past two decades, [Earth has] lost a tenth of [its] wilderness” (Crew). Meaning that the world has lost an area of land that is double the size of Alaska in a short period of time. Because of people, the habitable land is now being turned into deserts and ghost towns, forests are being cut down for town areas, and habitats are being destroyed for amusement
The environment has been put in a dangerous position of not having sufficient amount of resources for current residents and the future generations that are to come. Many things such as personal needs put the environment in this position, but most of time we use these products because they are needed. Earth has become reliant on the resources, therefore we use up our resources way too fast. Our current obstacle to obtaining sustainability is we don't manage our resources, and they are used too often when there is not enough to begin with. Individually we are responsible for ourselves and the actions that are used to take care of the environment. To reach sustainability, there needs to be a limit of how much is used.
Population continued to grow rapidly from the years 2001–2010 with little to no sign of slowing down. The Great Acceleration also notes the changes in the fertility rates that foresees the exponential population growth, and states that it will soon be over. This case study shows various graphs and they show that the resource use has continued to grow through the most recent decade, fertilizer consumption, paper production and water use on a global scale, have all risen, but one of the most important trends of all is the rapid rate of urbanisation. over 50% of the global population now live in urban areas.
Human activity can negatively impact on the environment in different ways, which can lead to consequences which are not only bad for the environmental area affected, but humans too. Activities such as causing radiation leaks with nuclear meltdowns and dumping waste are just some examples of how humans can worsen their own environment.
Presently there are a lot of problems, which shall be analyzed in order to assess the roots of the problem – is it possible to reduce the harmful effects on the planet, which we cause. There are few solutions for this question, each of it evolving different approaches, suitable for the different problems. But starting from the bottom of the problem it is not wrong to be said that the main factor for all negative effects is the human and in general the overpopulation. The increasing rate of it is frightening. Demographers from several universities and the United Nations Population Division conclude that 9.3 billion people will be living on the planet by 2050 and the world 's population will continue to grow beyond 2100. Nowadays the most populous country with 1.35 billion people is China. It is followed by India and the US, in second and third place respectively, in spite of the fact that America’s population is approximately one billion less than China’s. The researchers think in 2100 the expected number of people will be between 9.7 and 12.3 billion. What actually means the increased population? The answer is strain on the environment and the reason for this is that each additional inhabitant requires water, energy
Not only is our economy impacting the population, but so is the environment. “Population is the number one threat to our environment”. (Population Growth