The purpose of this study is to discover and gain an understanding into why teenage mothers do not continue to breastfeed. The researcher will use a mixed methods approach, which will enrich the quality of research findings and will enhance the reliability and validity of the data collection methods used and incorporates a positivist approach (Parahoo 2006 and Andrew and Halcomb 2009). The use of both approaches makes a great contribution to research, building on existing knowledge and skills (Gelling 2014). Bryman (2012) supports mixed methods studies as they can identify weaknesses in the other method and both can complement each other, although Saks and Allsop (2013) found that mixed methods research can be challenging and may complicate the proposal. Quantitative and qualitative research styles will both be used to increase the validity of the study, Parahoo (2006) agrees with this and describes this method as triangulation, incorporating a positivist approach. De Poy and Gitlin (2011) and Bryman (2012) agree with this and express that using a mixed methods approach gives a further comprehensive knowledge of the research method and conjoining the two can complement each other. Furthermore, Larkin et al (2014) state that the intention of mixed methods research is to improve confidence in findings, increase understanding in healthcare and ensure all groups in society are listened to. Moreover, Gelling, L (2014) found that the use of both approaches makes a great
A mixed methodology is generally the process of collecting, examining, and combining both qualitative and quantitative information obtained in a single study or in multiple series of scientific research. The example of research on poor housing facilities in a community can involve the combination of the methods of research I human services field (Cozby et al., 1989). Summary of how scientifically sound research can help support the function of human
In this assignment I will be comparing the different types of research methodologies for health and social care.
Drawing on a range of evidence discuss how different types of research can be used to support practice.
Moreover, this title lacked in a word, triangulation while about the half of paper was devoted to the argument about triangulation. The abstract contained objectives, design, results, and conclusion in slightly repetitive manner. The introduction started with the summarization of current debate of those who agree and disagree with the mixed method studies, and the information of triangulation was followed by the description of the authors ' intention of the research. Consequently, the purpose section repeated a part of the introduction, they were, to identify and review the types of analysis methodology used in research articles whether parallel, concurrent, or sequential data analysis, and to demonstrate the use of triangulation by selecting papers resulted as complementary, convergent, and divergent. The authors chose to use systematic principles as a method and clearly presented each step, including terms and search engines they used to find articles and reasons of inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the selection, review, and categorization of articles, authors conducted two specific author name search without explaining why these people were picked for what purpose. After the identification of 168 papers, the
Various researches exists in the health care premises to determine the best policies that will promote the utilization of resources within healthcare. However, some research work that utilizes social scientific methods fails to focus on exploring maternal ambiguity and ambivalence. Rather, the paradigm informing the majority research about infants feeding practices remains a public health perspective. From that perspective, many studies tend to explore why women do not initiate breastfeeding. Again, it suggests some options why women do not breastfeed for the recommended period. Thus, it is imperative to recommend the appropriate interventions to change maternal behaviour. The work remains the most accurately considered advocacy research as its purposes help the overall public in some ways. It gives additional weight to arguments for devoting more governmental resources to breastfeeding promotion. A small number of studies have utilized social sciences methods to generate valuable insights about the tension between policy and maternal practices and experience.
Full-time work status has shown to have a considerable negative impact on breastfeeding continuation, particularly among mothers who return to work within 12 weeks (Mandal., 2010; Mirkovic et al., 2014a). In contrast, Ms.Clancy stated full-time job status was not an independent determinator to breastfeeding cessation. Mothers with strong social support and adequate workplace support are less likely to be affected even when they work full-time. She acknowledged that both local breastfeeding coalition and peer support played a significant role in encouraging breastfeeding continuation among full-time working mothers. The systematic analysis by Chung et al. (2008) found that lay support increased the duration of any breastfeeding and recommended
In any mixed methods study, you should clearly indicate that you are collecting both quantitative and qualitative data. Methods of data collection are typically associated with either numbers or numeric data and words or text and image data. Mixed methods researchers collect both quantitative and qualitative data.
In addition, the researcher used thematic analysis to find any of the explicit or implicit themes within the interview comments and surveys. The purpose of using thematic analysis was to be able to gather any sort of commonalities within the responses of the participants. In addition, with the use of the purposive sampling method, the participant was able to gather testimonial narratives that would provide a depth of information to the study (Merriam, 1992). The criterion for the study was: female Elementary school educators, who are breastfeeding while working within this setting or who have breastfed within the last ten years. In addition, the participants needed to have taught within the Yolo or Sacramento counties. The participants had to be female and working while breastfeeding. Each participant was asked for their consent to take part in the study. The research includes interviews and Likert scale surveys of Elementary school educators from Yolo and Sacramento counties. The participants acknowledged their consent through the reading and signing of the consent letter for taking part in the study (Appendix A). Also, before each participant was interviewed, they were first given a Likert scale survey (Appendix B). After completing the survey, the participants were then interviewed individually, using a ten question open-ended questionnaire (Appendix C). The interview sessions were all conducted by the researcher. The participants were interviewed to gain insight on factors that influence/d their experiences and decision making regarding breastfeeding in the workplace. The focus was on their narrative testimonial accounts and whether their experiences also impacted their private and public
statistics in the study shows other factors associated with early breastfeeding discontinuation which is maternal age younger than 30 years old has a significant impact on discontinuing breastfeeding, following by 63.3% of mothers with the first child, depression in the family, single, Medicaid; 80%, 57.1%, 50%, respectively. The rest of factors were no family planning, does not have a partner, parental care after the first trimester, ethnic minority, and childhood trauma, Whereas, Domestic violence was the lowest factor. In the second research which conducted on 31 of sample size, the reasons for breastfeeding discontinuation were 23%for either reason milk did not come in/ milk dried up, or perceived that baby prefers the bottles. While, 17%
The use of mixed methods is currently increasing in social science research since it emphasizes methodological pluralism, and provides a broader and more credible understanding of the research problem than the use of a single method (Tashakkori and Teddlie 2010). However, mixing methods for no good reason other than the sake of it can produce disjointed and unfocussed research, and can severely test the capabilities of researchers. I raise some cautionary issues in this paper by critiquing the methodology in the journal article titled “Researching men: the politics and possibilities of a qualitative mixed-methods approach” published by Meth and McClymont (2011).
We know that when it comes to breast feeding it is not as easy as we think it is. I used to think that it was all about the baby and how they respond, but I found out quickly it is about how both the mother and baby respond. My sister tried hard to breast fed her daughter, but they could not get her to latch on. After reading some research I found some factors that play into these negative outputs on breast feeding. Breast feeding can be stressful on the mother and baby. When that happens neither the mom nor the baby want to breast fed. While researching, I found some contributors to the negative effects on breast feeding. Some mothers might not like it, because they simply don’t want to do it. According to the article, Infant feeding experiences among teen mothers in North Carolina: Findings from a mixed-methods study, they found that some mothers don’t like the act of breast- feeding, and lack the confidence to believe in themselves to be able to breast feed (Tucker, Wilson, & Samandari, 2011, 2). These negative barriers that we see in breast feeding can be fixed by passing on the knowledge of breast-feeding and what it can do for the mother and the
Quantitative research is considered to be the use of numbers. In the use of a quantitative study, the researcher test objective theories by examining the conjunction among variables. The variables used can be measured on instruments, so that numbered data can be used and analyzed (Creswell, 2008). Qualitative research is mainly used to explore and understand human or social problems. The process of qualitative studies includes questions and procedures; and the data is collected byway of participant’s settings. It allows the researcher to study an issue in great detail and depth, as well as not allowing data collection to be constrained by predetermined data. Mixed methods research combines quantitative and qualitative methods and it involves philosophical assumptions. This form of study includes collecting and analyzing data from a quantitative and qualitative perspective. It is believed that mixed methods research is a great method for practicing researchers who would like to bridge the schism between quantitative and qualitative research (Onwuegbuzie & Leech, 2004a). Even though these methods are different, they all involve philosophical assumptions and distinct methods or procedures (Cresswell, 2009).
When both research designs are used together, more information can be gathered. Mixed methodology uses the numerical portion of the quantitative study design in combination with the descriptive aspect of the qualitative study. There are many similarities between these two designs, which make them compatible with each other.
Like Amy and Loeber (2009), when it comes to the ecological paradigm of teenage pregnancy, Corcoran, Franklin, and Bennett (2000) also believe one’s socioeconomic status is a huge factor that contributes to this problem. A person’s socioeconomic status a lot of times determines “education, expanded family size, single-parent household structure, and lessened resources in terms of employment and income.” These three authors claim that educational performance and goals “dictate the potential costs of child bearing at a young age.” Their studies have also shown that teenage girls’ relationships with the school setting and poorer performance in school serve a greater risk for adolescent pregnancy.
The transferability of a study according to Wright (2014) is the concept of external validity which is when the study and its findings could be repeated by other researchers working in different venues (p.115). “Researchers should provide sufficient information on the informants and the research context to enable the reader to assess the findings’ capability of being fit or transferable” (Cope, 2017, p. 89). The study by Pradeilles et al, provided a detailed time line, note-taking methods and criteria for choice of codes to demonstration its transferability. This study used a mixed research method which involved both qualitative and quantitative to collect quality and quantity data. Pradeilles et al., (2016) explain the mixed methods design allows the authors to obtain views from a greater number of people in a