The Crusades were a both successful and unsuccessful group of Christians that would go to war in the name of God and protection for his land. The Crusades were around between the 11th and 15th centuries, in my opinion they were very unsuccessful with spreading christianity but they still did some things right. The Crusades were very unorganized and didn't know how to form a good alliance, they were irresponsible as well but as a result of this, the Crusades, in other points of view, would be a persistent group that might've helped spread Christianity.
The Crusades gained Jerusalem in such a short time, but what they gained so quickly was slowly but steadily lost, in my opinion, the Crusades should not have lost something so fast if they were planning to expand a belief beyond their home. I believe that this was a result of some of the people crusading, for some, according to history-world.org, the First Crusade was an excuse to unleash savage attacks in the name
…show more content…
They held territory significantly far from home, which meant they were easier to overrule but it never did happen, along with that,The Crusades faced many obstacles. The Crusaders, like their leaders, were not very fond of each other either, they would faction themselves and didn't get along with each other too well. But regardless of that, people may argue that The Crusades were persistent, and that was how they might've helped spread Christianity.
To conclude, The Crusades were not successful in spreading Christianity due to their irresponsibility and unorganization. But some might argue that The Crusades were persistent which has some valid areas of encouragement, however I still believe that The Crusades were not successful. Were it not for my valid areas of discouragement, I would've agreed that the Crusades were successful. All of these facts were taken from:
Although the Christian crusades were slowly fought, in fact, it took over three centuries to re-acquire their lost territories (A.D. 1000-1300), they secured their presence within the region by utilizing tactics
Throughout the entirety of the Crusades, there were a multitude of goals that each combatant from the Christian, Muslim, and Judaism were trying to achieve. There is a lurking question, and that is: were the Crusades a success for anyone? Some historians will lecture that the Crusades were an overall success, some believe that they were only partially successful in conveying they’re overall message. Then there’s the historians that will lecture that the Crusades were a complete failure.
There were eight significant Crusades, which were sparked for many different reasons by many different people that left a lasting effect to the world. These years of bloodshed were led by men of power in order to gain control over Jerusalem at the expenses of others. Throughout the 11th to 13th century, nine significant crusades occurred. There were many other small crusades throughout this period, which continued into the 16th century, until the Renaissance and Reformation when political and religious climate of Europe was drastically different than that of the middle ages (CBN). The most successful of the rebellion was that of the First Crusade. After taking Nicea, the Anatolian capital of the Seljuks, the Crusaders captured Antoich in Syria and Jerusalem in 1099 (history bits). The success of these missions allowed Crusaders to establish permanent settlements
The Crusades were a series of nine wars that began when Christians accumulated the first Crusaders to go and fight to take Jerusalem from the Muslims. But though the Crusades failed in their quest to conquer Jerusalem, there were positive and negative effects. However, it is evident in many ways the results were very damaging; in the way they impacted future relationships of Christians, Muslims, and Jews; and in how terrible the 4th Crusade ended up being.
The First Crusades was a military group that was started by Christians in Europe who wanted to gain back the Holy Land that was being occupied by the Muslims. Pope Urban II preached a sermon at Clermont Ferrand on November 1095. Most histories consider this speech to be the spark the fueled a wave of military campaigns to gain back the Holy Land. This speech was meant to unite the Europeans and to gain back what was taken from them. The holy land was a small area on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea. The First Crusades was a very successful military expedition that was driven by religious faith to reclaim Jerusalem and other holy places that fell under Muslim control. driven by religious faith. They wanted to gain back the Holy Land that was once theirs. Arabs and the Muslim Turks otherwise known as the Seljuk Turks were the Muslims that invaded and conquered land rightfully occupied by the Christian’s. Many European men, women, and children joined the Crusades and fought in the Middle East. Pope Urban II granted forgiveness of all sins to those who died in battle thus assuring them ascendancy into heaven. Which gave those who volunteered to fight assurance. Nobles and peasants responded in great numbers to the call and marched across Europe to the capital of the Byzantine empire. Having the support of the Byzantine emperor helped make them a stronger army. The Crusaders took over many of the cities on the Mediterranean coast and built a large number of fortified castles across the Holy Land to protect their newly established territories. Soon after seizing power the Seljuks face a very different challenge to Islamic civilization. It came from Christian Crusaders. Knights from western Europe who were determined to capture portions of the Islamic world that made up the holy land of biblical times. Muslim political division and element of surprise made the first of the Crusaders assaults, between 1096 and 1099, by far the most successful. Much of
The crusades where intended to spread Christianity Universally. However many of the actions during the crusades did not promote peace as they where intended (William J.). Many Europeans feeling the need to join the cause in crusades, joined the cause with nothing but wooden crosses, many people abandoned their homes to join on the journey. Crusades left many people dead in the Middle East. Jerusalem being the major goal of conquest of the crusaders in the end many of the crusades failed or simply turned back (Brown, Bryan).
The First Crusade was the pinnacle of the entire Crusade campaign. Its lone success in the long line of Crusades proves its uniqueness among the six others that were mostly ineffective. Certain fortunate circumstances definitely contributed to the Christian success in taking the Holy Land on their first try. Similarly, many other circumstances were responsible for why the following crusades were less successful and in some cases disastrous. From the first crusade being a holy pilgrimage for military and religious reasons, the following crusades were for personal gain, power, and wealth. Also, the distance between Europe and the Holy Land gradually took a toll on the Christians in the later
The Crusades was one of the most violent times in human history. The crusaders were very strong and powerful. The city that was the most important to people was Jerusalem. According to Thomas Madden book The Concise History Crusades he states the crusaders were interested in Jerusalem because the Christens wanted to get back Jerusalem so Christianity can be the strongest religion . I believe that crusaders wanted to be one of the supreme army during that time period so they could be powerful religion
After all the research that I made and tried to understand the motives behind the crusades I concluded that the crusades were purely political and religiously incorrect. The cause of Christ had nothing to do with the crusades as a matter of fact the crusades represented the total opposite of what the Christ was preaching. The Bible can be one of the most dangerous tools if misused and abused, just like a gun is dangerous in the hand of someone who does not have the proper training on how to handle it so is the Bible. The crusades were the inventions of ambitious men who wanted to gain more riches and power. Most of the European population was either illiterate or did not have a good understanding of the scriptures when Pope Urban II used their ignorance for his own stupid political gain. In the Holy Scriptures it is written in Hosea 4:6, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge...” as a result of those unfounded wars the Muslims and Christians could never found a common ground nor live together. Both side had endured great lost that could not be easily forgotten, the mistrust and the enmity between Christians and Muslims is still being felt in our
The first crusade were a large wave of military pilgrimages, comprising of Western Christians. Their purpose was proclaimed by the papacy in reclaiming Jerusalem from heretics (Saracens and gentiles), as well as surrounding areas which compromised the Holy Land. Whilst this aim was achieved by the crusaders, it was disorganised and was plagued by misinformed beliefs and ideologies. Large groups which formed the crusade were motivated by political and/or economical gains. It can be argued that these alternative ‘aims’, were due to many perceiving the crusade as an opportunity to take advantage of the fall of their opponents. Some intended to acquire land from Muslims, this was typically sought by younger sons of nobility. Another incentive to join the crusade was the potential economic gain because of the possibility of being able to plunder. An implication of the lack of a pious intent led to the massacring of Jews, which was a defiance of the papacy. As Thomas Madden asserts “there were misguided, misinformed, or cynical attacks on Jews.” with no reason for them to be attacked as it was only Saracens and gentiles being their aim of elimination. Therefore, it can be argued to a large extent that the crusaders aims were met with success, however the flaws must be acknowledged and explored as to whether it did hinder the crusades in reaching their goals or just demonstrates the disorganisation and the decentralised, erratic nature of the crusade.
There are a lot of events that shaped the history of early Europe. Our ancestors had a lot on their plate when they discovered new lands and fought new diseases. One of the early forces that had a major impact were the crusades. The Crusades were a bunch of religious wars that were called on by the Pope and the Catholic Church in order to defend Christianity against the Muslims and get closer to the holy cities and other places in ancient Palestine. So what exactly does “crusade” mean? The word comes from an old French word “crois”, which means cross (if you haven’t guessed it). The crusaders (men who take vows to fight for Christianity) were not usually under a single banner, they all
Dawn Hayes, a professor at Montclair State University, defines the Crusades as a “series of armed military campaigns waged between two very different cultures that had developed separately, but along paths that eventually brought them into violent contact”(3). In 1096, Pope Urban II declared war on the Muslims, with the goal of reclaiming the Holy Land from the Muslim invaders. Preparations began in eastern and western Europe; Kings began to hire more knights and begin to gather armies, and knights in smaller states led their own armies of the people, with untrained peasants as their foot soldiers. After three years, the Christians had a clear shot at the Muslim city of Jerusalem, and marched on the city with more than fifteen-thousand soldiers. This Crusade was the only one where the Christians successfully captured Jerusalem from the Muslims. After the defeat of the Muslims, people rejoiced, and praised the crusaders. European economies boomed, and the Christian world was in peace for some time. It wasn’t until 1144, when the governor of Mosul, Zangī,
The Crusades were battles in Palestine waged from 1096 to 1212 by European Christians to take back the Holy Land. Religious devotion was a major cause of the Crusades because of the expelling of the Muslims from the Holy Land, the promise of remission of sins, and the unity of European Christians of different origins under Pope Urban II. The want of the expulsion of Muslims from the Holy Land showed that the Crusades were caused by religious devotion. In 1095, the Byzantine Emperor called for help because they were being attacked by Turks.
The Crusades played a major role in European territorial expansion. The Crusades impacted internal European development. The movement helped to militarize the medieval western Church. The world would be very different without
The Crusades started in the late eleventh century and continued in Europe though the end of the thirteenth century. The Crusades, at the time were simply called pilgrimages, however they are now known as the Crusades, meaning cross or holy war, because of our view of them, and their impact, after the fact. The two significant Crusades in Christian history are the First Crusades which included the People’s Crusade and Princes’ Crusade, and the other important one being the Fourth Crusade, in 1204. The First Crusades were important because they were successful at accomplishing their goal of taking back Jerusalem. The Fourth Crusade is significant because clearly marks the split between the Eastern and Western churches. While it is commonly believed that the Crusades were caused by a single straightforward cause, this is not the case. In fact, the factors that caused the Crusades were very complex and came together to create the perfect storm. These factors included increasing aggression from the Islamic world, internal European conflicts, conflicts between the eastern and western churches, as well as Europe’s new found aggressive self confidence.