In the podcast, “Whose War Was It, Anyway?”, five historians observe and interpret the War of 1812 from various perspectives, influenced by their interest and area of studying. Different ways of looking at the history and improvement of technology over time has changed how the history of the War of 1812 has been studied. From various viewpoints, historians agree or disagree either with each other or with the way that the War of 1812 has been written by discovering new information and distortion of history, and providing their own interpretations of historical events. Additionally, the advance in technology has provided historians better access and information on the historical event, for instance, digitalized of the archives made the unknown …show more content…
For example, Stephen Harper articulates the war helped Canada be an independent and free country and emphasizes the heroic effects of Canadians; however, there was “no such thing as Canada” (Swift, Jamie) during that time. Also, the First nations treated as a hero even though they were real losers due to the betrayal of Britain on treaty of Ghent. Swift also remark that we should remember how the British “double crossed their principal and most important allies” (Swift, …show more content…
He mentions about the lack of respect for their contribution and that they were described as brutal and savage.
The five historians agree or disagree with the way that war of 1812 has been written. Both Emerson and Elliot describe that the study of history is focused on interests of the majority and exclude minorities. For example, Emerson illustrates how historians did not place a greater emphasis on the contribution of women. Elliot also refers that Britain was not keen to recall war of 1812, which was lesser important event. Moreover, Swift and Jamieson questions about rebranding Canada as a nation of militarism.
I think the Canadian Conservative Government should not pursue to rebrand Canada as a nation of militarism. It might provide Canadians patriotism and images that they want people to have toward Canada; however, it is misrepresenting historical events by reshaping memory and understanding. For example, the First Nations are described as hero even though they were the real loser. They were exploited as a buffer zone and betrayed by the Britain. Also, as Jamieson mentioned, they are not receiving respect for what they have done. They have been effectively omitted from the war of 1812 enactment. Furthermore, if the government successes to rebrand Canada, it is possible that people believe the reshaped image and observe
World war 1 held many memorable and proud moments for Canada. One of the moments were made by the flying ace in the Canadian military. His name was Billy Bishop and he was credited with 72 victories, making him the top Canadian ace in World War 1. Also, The Battle of Vimy Ridge toughened Canadian nationalism and pride when they won against Germany. All the Canadians were all so proud of there country and military. Moreover, they thought that Canada’s was superior then all the other countries.
Being the Second World War that Canada had taken part in, they had grown farther apart from Britain. There was a greater sense of pride and nationalism, Canadians no longer sought to be British or American, but Canadian. Canada’s growth didn’t stop just there, it matured and also gained Political
Reflecting a Canadian ideal embraces our responsibility for one another (Segal 169). Addition to that, Canadians were buried in battlefields around the world and we weren’t the ones to cut and run our allies (Segal 169).Canadian ideal has shown loyalties that moved parents, elderlies and their parents to support and find ideas like freedom and democracy (Segal 169). The soldiers then laid their lives down for the freedom we share today (Segal 169). The action they took then is how we are living the way we are today in our society. This premise proves the notion that Canadian history reflects our Canadian Ideal, through this we astrayed from the American ideal and defended the Canadian perspective.
Canada’s military performance in various battles such as the Battle of Passchendaele and Vimy Ridge in World War I was epoch-making and it really illustrated our military strength. Canada was praised as a nation and our identity was impacted by World War I. The war efforts and Canada’s involvement with the war were exceptional. While there were many events in Canadian history that helped shape our nation, World War I remains the most significant
Therefore, Canada’s role during the two world wars has been unethical, but shows continuity and significance throughout the 20th century. Canada during World War One
Before everything for Canada was all great, many things were destroyed during events but later on was able to be fixed and allow Canada to be stable just like how it is stated by Sir John A Macdonald who said,“ I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship my own way, free to stand for what i think right, free to oppose to what i believe wrong, or free to choose who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom i pledge to uphold myself”. This quote connects very well as though Canada had an unstable history, it ended to be able to be everything the quote stated. However, in order to achieve this, many events occurred; such as the Spanish Succession war, the Seven years war, as well as Loyalists that started settling in Upper Canada, and the Act of Union. The Spanish Succession took place in 1713 allowing Britain to take over Acadia.
You will see in our story of Canada’s wars a disproportionate emphasis on the Great War. This war originated or brought into maturity many of the war-promoting factors as well as means of suppressing antiwar factors. Like its leftover unexploded shells that killed people decades later, the Great War also gave the world latent international relations explosives that virtually
Due to the evidence of the failure of the Federalist Party, the Maritime provinces' profit, the burning of York and Washington, and symbolic gains of independent pride, it’s clear the war ended on equal footing. However, it is important to recognize third parties like the First Nations Peoples who allied with the British and were abandoned to be removed by the Americans. The First Nations peoples, who were promised help from the British after the war, received no help from the British and continued to have the USA remove them (“Remembering the war of 1812” by Abel). Moreover, it is important to recognize warriors like war chief Tecumseh who died fighting bravely alongside Canadian forces on October 13th, 1813, who greatly affected the outcome of a significant war for what became the country of Canada(“James Madison” by
Canada, at the time had been ruled by Great Britain. In Document C, a Congressman of Virginia with name of John Randolph complains that the United States principal purpose to going war is to take over Canada. H explains that the United States leaders are rather selfish and greedy and how it seems to be the leading cause of going into war. According to the text in Document C it states, “…if you go to war it would not be for the sake of… Maritimes right” and, “… Canada seems to be their tempting sight.”. This explains that John thinks that all the United Sates only care is for more land. However, this statement is not very true. The United States did care about gaining more land but wasn’t the only matter that led Americans to declare the War of 1812. This would also play into National Pride being something proud American citizens can heroically boast and brag about. Gaining land in Canada can be a major accomplishment for the United Sates and could be a great example of National
The war of 1812 was “one of those episodes in history that make everybody happy, because everybody interprets it in his own way” . Some believe it was the due to the fact that “Canada was defended by veteran British soldiers” so they were strong enough to defend themselves from capture. Others historians disagree and, argue that it was a “Second War of Independence” for America. What most historians do agree on, is that it would have been quite easy for America to capture Canada. However, due to the fact that they didn’t exploit their advantages, this led them to not be capable of capturing British North America.
that led up to a war outbreak. Similarly, the War of 1812 piqued the interests of many scholars, eventually giving rise to controversial analysis and interpretations. To narrow down, the two essays Who Were the War Hawks? and The War Hawks of 1812: An Historical Myth written respectively by Reginald Horsman and Roger H. Brown, present contrasting views and reflects the interest still shown toward the causes of the 1812 war, resulting in contradicting, and controversial opinions and conclusions.
In June 1812 the Unites States took on the most powerful in the world at the time, Great Britain, this war would not only define James Madison’s presidency but also the future of of the United States. However this war is known as the forgotten war, forgotten by the Americans and the British. On the other hand, it is remembered by the Native Nations and Canada. The big question that comes to mind is who won? Well it’s say to say that both side suffered great losses and great wins and some may say Canada got the upper hand. For a forgotten war it sure did have a great everlasting impact.
The War of 1812 is a significant event in the formation of Canada and was considered the "seedtime" of the British Canadian Nationalism. Many incidents lead to the outbreak of the war. Some of which were caused by a series of economic sanctions imposed by the British against the United States and the lasting effects of the Napoleonic Wars. Conflict over the Western posts enraged the Americans due to the fact that it would halt their expansion. The British refused to leave these areas because they believed they weren’t receiving the compensation they deserved and instead stayed in these areas to maintain the French fur trading posts. The Napoleonic wars lead to ‘The Chesapeake incident of 1812’ as the British were ‘stealing’ American citizens.
The Second World War is looked back upon as a time of great sorrow, yet also honour for Canada. Despite the destruction, death, and devastation, World War II became a defining moment in the development of Canada’s identity. As seen in this quote from the Counterpoints Socials 11 textbook, “It was a good war for Canada too, because it made us a great nation. I mean... it showed us what we could do.
One of Canada’s largest military endeavors was the battle of Vimy Ridge during World War One. It was a fierce battle between Germans and Canadians. Canada was trying to take over the German controlled ridge, which ran from northwest to southwest between Lens and Arras, France. Its highest point was 145 feet above sea level, which was exceptionally helpful in battle because of the very flat landscape. Already over 200,000 men had fallen at Vimy, all desperately trying to take or defend this important and strategic ridge. As a result of its success in taking the ridge, Canada gained a lot more than just the strategic point. Canada was united as a nation, and the victory changed the way other counties viewed them. Canadians no longer