Who has the smartest rat? Maria and Tran want to find out who’s rat is smarter. To find this they timed how long it took both rats to get through a maze. To help them solve this problem I first analysed the data by finding the mean, median, mode, and range for each rat. The data shows that Maria’s rat is smarter. Many things show this , but two of them are the range and the box plot. Moreover, the range helped me find out that Maria’s rat is smarter. It highlights that her rat showed more improvement than Tran’s did. Also, the boxplot was useful too. It helped me come to a conclusion by showing that Maria's rat started out slower than Tran’s, but then started to improve more rapidly than Tran’s rat. To sum it up, Maria’s rat is smarter,
(a). Plot mean chart (x-chart) and range chart (R-chart) to analyze these data. Sample No. Observations Mean Range
- In addition to this 1 rat, the other rat on S8b schedule is showing steady performance at 55% accuracy with 33% omissions. We also have 6 rats that have reached S7b schedule this week. In addition, we have 4 rats that have been moved on to S6b schedule.
For the education data, I must say to calculate the median, from high school to college graduate, the median would be the some college portion since it would be the middle. The median for the experimental group would be 11 and 34.4% and for the control group it would be 15 and 41.7%.
Various experiments and measurements were performed in the field in order to compare the two types of rodents. The following is a list of the data collected through multiple observations over a span of two years. We captured 100 rats of each rodent population, and we found the average weight, length, hind limb, and forelimb measurements. In addition, we conducted experiments in regards to their top speed, average height that they could leap, gestation time, and average time spent in the courtship display.
- Along with the above rats, we have 2 Male KO's on S7b schedule.Their performance was 50% and 46% accuracy with less than 23% and 30% omissions respectively. The female WT started running on the challenge trials of S6b schedules from next week. It finished only 24 trials with 87% accuracy and 13%
I think Jim from the book “Sewer Rats” is a better protagonist than Callie from the book “Flower Power”. Jim is a better protagonist than Callie since I can connect with him more than I can connect with Callie. I can connect with Jim since he enjoys simple things especially like playing paintball. I also enjoy playing paintball so I can connect with Jim that way proving he is more connectable with. In the book Callie does not seem to enjoy things making her harder to connect with. Another reason why Jim is the better protagonist is that he is just plain likeable. He is very likeable since he just doesn’t realize how awesome he is. In the book, Jim saves Carter and Lisa with the help of his friends. So to the rest of his friends he should be
The largest difference was between the first and last trials (also known as the range). It wasn’t very large compared to others in my group either. My data stayed pretty static throughout the lab. It could have possibly circulated around an error or flaw. Maybe the paper straw was too condensed, heavily affecting my outcome. The comparison between the first and the last trial suggested a change in the curve of the paper worm. According to my opinionated and qualitative observations, my paper worm steadily curved. The quantitative length of my paper worm was originally ___ and amending to ___ in length. The simplest way to determine the length is to measure from the beginning point or the point farthest to the left and measure it to the point furthest to the right. I believe that to be the most effective and accurate method. The rating portion in the measurement of shape was the most precise of the two. Instead of two choices, it expands to a more complex system of determination. (central tendency) ___________. For the data set there is one best measure for central tendency because the method has no or a few errors for the specific data
In January of 2004, my parents surprised my sister and I with our very own puppy. We were ecstatic because it was our first pet. When we got the dog home, we immediately began thinking of suitable names. Finally, we decided on Gracie, and we have been enjoying her company ever since. Nearly 11 years later my parents decided to surprise us again. They bought a new puppy named Molly and welcomed her to the family. Since then Gracie and Molly have been the best of friends. They enjoy snuggling under blankets, taking naps, and playing fetch. Although Gracie and Molly share many of the same interest, they differ in that of breed, age, and attitude.
Rat’s key qualities are leadership, smart and empathic.Rat shows the quality of leadership in the scene where he goes to the station. A quote which give evidence of this quality is “don’t run he said slow down ok.” ( Mulligan, 2011, pg.42). Another important quality that Rat shows is smart. He demonstrates this quality in the scene where he make it look like he is meant to be there. A quote which gives evidence of this quality is “ they stop and played with the drinks machines.” (Mulligan, 2011‘ pg.42). Finally, Rat’s quality of empathic is shown in the scene where he said that is ok straight away with out knowing what it is. A quote which gives evidence of this quality is “ we need your help I said. That ok.” ( Mulligan, 2011,
In order to pick which variable has a better correlation with species, we created a scatter plot in Exhibit 5 with the variable Salrange which shows a linear form and a moderate correlation. Exhibit 6 confirms the moderate, negative correlation of -0.72 with species. Next, we will look at the correlation between Meansal and species. Exhibit 7 shows a nonlinear scatter plot with very little correlation. Exhibit 8 shows that there is an extremely weak correlation between the variable Meansal and species. Exhibit 9 includes the regression model when using Salrange as the explanatory variable:
The relationship in horror between the protagonist and the “other” can be discovered through the works of H.H. Munro’s “Sredni Vashtar” and “The rats in the wall” by H.P Lovecraft. In “Sredni Vashtar”, Conradin worships the pole-cat ferret and confidently trusts it will defend him from his guardian, for instance, Conradin believes the toothache is the sign of the ferret’s power and ultimately the trust of Conradin gives the ferret greater power to kill his guardian. In “The rats in the wall”, the black cat had warned the narrator multiple times to stop him going into greater danger, but unlike the “Sredni Vashtar”, the narrator does not believe the black cat will demonstrate actions in his benefit, which causes final destruction of the narrator.
his box and whiskers plot shows the difference in time between test 1 and test 2. The median is 2.85 which means that’s the middle improvemnet from test 1 to test 2 was 2.85 seconds. The lowest improvements was 0.2 ad the highest value is 5.42. The lowest improvements was 0.2 seconds while the highest improvments was 5.42 secons. Because the range of the difference (from 0.2 to 5.42seconds) does not include zero, it shows that pratcicing writing a sentence will improve the time is takes to write
Interpretation: The boxplot displays the behavior score distributions by grade. The behavior scores differ significantly by grade level. The lower high school has a higher average median score than both the middle school and upper high school. The lower high school has the smallest variance in scores while the upper high school has the largest variance in scores. There were a disproportionate number of middle school observations when compared to the high school data.
As described in my introduction, I have found the mean, median, mode, and range of both genders. I got this data table from (http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005061.html). This link leads to a table from the U.S Bureau of the Census. The table is displaying the median age at first marriage between the years of 1890-2010. The median of both genders were found in the 14th spot in the data table.The mode was observed in both genders. Also observed was that the most occurring ages for both male and female happened in the same 10 year time span. The process of finding the mean was shown below.
From the data posted by education department, mean of teenagers’ pocket money are 151*4 = $604 per month. Compared with sample mean we found, difference between two samples is 1292.5-604=$688.5. The difference due to change of HK economic environment and more teenagers earn their pocket money from attending part time job. It is advised that