What Are The Similarities Between Monarchies And Republics

Republic ~ a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.

the aim of getting a Constitutional Republic is to put limits on the “tyranny of the bulk.” It protects the unalienable rights of individuals from an overwhelming government. Alexis Delaware author wrote, “If, on the opposite hand, a legislative power may be therefore implanted on represent the bulk while not essentially being the slave of its passions, associate govt therefore on retain a

1. The problems that Thomas Paine sees with the British monarchy involve its straying from ideal government, the unjust placement of one individual above all others, and its hereditary aspect. The problems that Thomas Paine sees with King George III in particular are his personal transgressions against liberty. Thomas Paine, firstly views government as “but a necessary evil” (15), and therefore it should be both as limited as possible and also tied to the more positive society. The ideal form of government, thus according to Paine, is a simple republic where the elected are forced to be accountable to their electors (16). The British monarchy fails in all accounts; not only does the prescence of a monarchy at all eliminate the accountability of a republic, but the complicatedness of the British monarchy system makes it worse in this aspect than even other monarchies. Although absolute monarchies are horrid in that they give no power to the people, they are still simpler than the British monarchy; this makes issues much more difficult to handle in the British monarchy (17). The other problems that Paine has with the British monarchy apply to monarchies at large. Paine argues that the placement of one person above all others is an unnatural divide; there is no explanation for the division of people into “KINGS and SUBJECTS” (22) such as there are in other forms of division that humans live with. If it does not make sense to place one individual above all others, then such should most certainly not be law; therefore, from this logic, monarchy, which is entirely based on the principle of placing one person (and their relatives) above all others, is an invalid and unnatural form of government. Of course, some people could, arguably, have earned the admiration and respect of their peers through important action, and thus be deserving of a leadership position. In a republic, by listening to their electors, the elected earn their right to lead. However, the hereditary monarchy removes this earning of the right to lead, and Paine takes issue with that. There is no guarantee that the descendants of a good leader will also be good leaders, and therefore the government of a country should never be left to heredity (29).

A republic is a form of government in which power is held by the people. In this form of government, people are able to elect their own representatives. After the independence of America, the definition of republic was that the power rested on the consent of the governed, and that there would be no King or Monarchy. Like Paine, Noah Webster believed in Equality when he stated that

Republics challenged all the assumptions and principles that a monarchy ran off of which includes, kinship, war, dependency and inequality. When left alone free people's will run amuck doing what is in the best interest of them. Monarchies are the parent to the child demanding work for the general will over their own pursuits. A quote from an English jurist William Blackstone once said,

Another way that a republic guards against a faction is expanding to include more people. In a large republic each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens. The greater number of citizens will make it more difficult for unworthy candidates to gain elected office. Elections are designed to allow people to choose the men that they want to be represented by. People are more likely to choose the man with the most attractive merit and the most established character thus preventing a man with vicious views to gain

The Founding Fathers wanted our government to be a republic because the people wanted their opinion to be heard in the laws that were made and the taxes that were being set. The people wanted to have a decision in what happens to their country. When the government is a republic the people have a say in people that represent them, but there are still laws and there is still rules to stand by. The people are still free and still have restrictions, but there are people to protect you such as police

Let’s see what is Monarchy? It is a king or queen who gets all the powers of authority from inheritance and power stays in the same family, usually the bloodline from father to son. In Ancient Greeks, there weren’t too many monarchies, but there was some present and even Athens went under the monarchy at the end of the classical period which ended with the death of Alexander the Great. His father Phillip II of Macedon who became king after the deaths of his two brothers conquered Athens after the Peloponnesian war and ended democracy in the great city of Athens. (Wasson, 2014)

There is a fundamental difference between a democracy and a republic as it concerned the political entitlement of the citizenry. The citizens of a republic do not participate directly with governmental affairs. The citizens of a republic can however have a say in who does participate. The Roman republic has two prefect systems to prevent dictatorship which didn’t work.

“The government is merely a servant -- merely a temporary servant; it cannot be its prerogative to determine what is right and what is wrong, and decide who is a patriot and who isn't. Its function is to obey orders, not originate them.”

The Republic was a republican form of government that lasted over five hundred years. It was governed by a constitution based on a system of separation of powers as well as checks and balances. The

During the second half of the 17th century, there were many similarities and differences between the monarchy in England and France. These similarities and differences were seen in the theory and practice of the monarchies. In England, there was a Constitutional monarchy, while in France, there was an Absolutist monarchy. In the second half of the 17th century, absolute monarchs such as Louis XIV ruled in France, and William and Mary shared their power with Parliament in England. These two monarchies had differences theories and government, but they shared a similarity through the practice of mercantilism.

In an autocracy, one person has all the power. The person can gain their power by being related to the previous ruler, and then it would be also known as a monarchy. Andorra is an example of a current monarchy. Sometimes force is used to attain and hold authority, this is known as a dictatorship. North Korea is a dictatorship, with Kim Jong Un being the dictator. Theocracies can also be autocracies when there is a single religious leader who controls the government, such as Iran. ("Governments: How Do They Run?"). This government system is very fast at making decisions and this can be helpful

Government falls into two categories; monarchy or a republic. A monarchy is a form of government that is always headed by a

Following on from the preceding discussion, then, it is possible to explore the types of constitution in existence. From the aforementioned distinction, we can observe correct – rule with a view to the common good – and deviated – rule with a view to the private advantage – constitutional arrangements. Within each of these are three types of constitution. The three correct types of constitution comprise a kingship, an aristocracy, and a polity; the three deviated types of constitution consist of a tyranny,