Watson Doesn T Know It Won On Jeopardy !

Prop: I do not believe algorithmic machines lack understanding any more than humans do. Searle’s “Chinese Room” argument depends on the idea of intentionality. He believes that intentionality is

In response to the first claim of the computationalists, Searle states, although you respond appropriately, in no way do you understand the Chinese that you are being given and responding with. As far as the second condition, he counterclaims that the computer is simply "functioning and there

a test devised by computer science pioneer Alan Turing. It involves a human being unable to

In his example, he claims that the computer cannot know that “J.S. Bach” is the same person as “Johann Sebastian Bach.” According to him, “the computer is not necessarily capable of making these simple deductions.” However, the computer, along with the Internet, has continuously evolved to become increasingly smarter. With the likes of search engines like Google or Yahoo, computers are able to accurately predict and understand what the end user is attempting to locate.

John Searle's thought experiment concerning the "Chinese Room" attempts to disprove that so-called "strong-AI" (artificial intelligence that demonstrates "true" thinking and "understanding") could ever possibly exist. The argument is relatively straightforward: Searle imagines a computer running a program that allows it to communicate in written Chinese the program is capable of recognizing Chinese characters that are entered into it and of formulating a response in written Chinese that makes sense and appears conversant. This program is so perfect that it can convince a native Chinese speaker that the responses, generated solely through a series of complex rules or algorithms that the computer/program uses to react to the Chinese characters it receives as input, are coming from an actual human Chinese speaker. Next, Searle imagines that if he were placed in a room with this computer and if written Chinese communications were slipped under the door, he would be able (through use of the computer) to deliver appropriate responses to these communications without ever understanding a word of Chinese. As the human respondent (in this case Searle) is delivering Chinese responses without any understanding, he concludes that the computer program is working similarly, generating automatic if complex responses without actually understanding the language.

The second claim of strong AI, which Searle objects to, is the claim that the system explains human understanding. Searle asserts that since the system is functioning, in this case passing the Turing Test, (Brigeman, 1980) there

The ideal residence hall community is one where the students and RA can make a community that is comfortable, fun, and respectful. In Davidson Hall, a first-year dorm, many students will come in afraid, not knowing what college will be like. Most students start to feel lonely and need friends and others to talk to. A potential program to be held is simply a "Rutgers Game Night". Games would be held with different themes on the University to help the residents learn more about where they live and the many resources available. An example would be Rutgers Jeopardy. Jeopardy makes it easy for teams to connect and communicate to find answers, while setting a foundation for friendships. People tend to connect to others by simply enjoying different

Turing, a physicalist, believed that artificial intelligence could be achieved in the future. Turing argued that the mind was merely due to the physical aspects of the brain and so a machine could one day be created that has a mind of its own, i.e. artificial intelligence. He created a test called the Turing Test to determine whether a machine has artificial intelligence. In the Turing Test, an interrogator asks two subjects a series of questions. One of the subjects is a person, the other is the computer. The goal is for the person to imitate a computer and the computer to imitate the person. If the interrogator is fooled into thinking that the computer is the human then the computer, according to Turing, is concluded to have the ability to think and thus, have a mind. Turing argued that machines passing the Turing Test were sufficient for ascribing thought.

Watson Analytics was named after IBM’s first CEO Thomas J. Watson. IBM Watson Analytics is a system that was specifically designed to answer questions on the quiz show Jeopardy. In 2011, Watsons natural language questions and content was fast enough and good enough to compete and win against the champion players at Jeopardy. IBM Watson won first place, and the prize was $1 million. IBM Watson was developed in

In attempting to answer the question of whether machines are able to think, Turing redesigns the question around the notion of machines’ effectiveness at mimicking human cognition. Turing proposes to gauge such effectiveness by a variation of an ‘imitation game,’ where a man and a woman are concealed from an interrogator who makes

Through this, Searle argues that if a human and machine receive the same input and then respond by the same output, how are they any different from one another? When given the same purpose, humans and machines have the same response, therefore machines may have a mind. Gilbert Ryle created The computational theory of mind that claims “Computers behave in seemingly rational ways; their inner program causes them to behave in this way and therefore mental states are just like computational states”. He continues on by saying that “If logic can be used to command, and these commands can be coded into logic, then these commands can be coded in terms of 1s and 0s, therefore giving modern computers logic. Through this, how is one to tell if robots don’t have minds if they use logic just like humans do. When the purpose of humans and machines are the same, they may process differently in order to complete that purpose, although they may have the same output. Because humans and machines receive the same input and return the same output, they both have minds in addition to functions and processes in order to do that.

The reason of why Watson requires so much powerful hardware is to quickly process information through its huge database and the internet database. It is also beneficial to process its mistakes and use algorithms to learn. 2) How “ intelligent” is Watson? What can it do? What can’t it do?

In “Minds, Brains and Programs” by John R. Searle exposed his opinion about how computers can not have Artificial intelligence (Al). Searle portraits this claim about computers through an experiment he created called the “Chinese Room” where he shows that computers are not independent operating systems and that they do not have minds. In order to understand better the experiment Searle demonstrates the contrast between strong and weak Al, which later through my paper I will explain what this means. In what follows, I will explain what Searle’s “Chinese Room” experiment is, and what does it, according to him, demonstrate. I will also argue how I agree with his conclusion because I believe that computer cannot think.

Argument 1. “Syntax and semantics”. To begin, John Searle takes into account that humans understand semantics and syntax. That concludes that an intelligent being can demonstrate intention and consciousness through the use of meaning with semantic symbols or behaviours. Searle 's first argument is that “programs are purely formal (syntactic)” (Cole, 1). This argument ignores the science behind how computers and human brains work. The neural

I am going to argue that Searle is correct to claim that digital computers are not capable of genuine understanding. I believe computers are told what to do without any genuine understanding of what the computers are doing. It is impossible for a computer programmed machine to think.