preview

Warfare In A Thousand Splendid Suns

Decent Essays

Witless Warfare Imagine watching the news since there is nothing else that is interesting on television. A documentary about World War II is playing, but switching to the other news channel will lead to long discussions about some conflict in Afghanistan. Warfare exists throughout the world, but what does all this fighting cause? Also, why are nations willing to start warfare with each other at any time? The answer is that there is no purpose! Warfare is meaningless and should have no place on earth. In any warfare that has ever existed, from World War II all the way up to Afghanistan's conflicts, there is always an absurdity to conflict as shown in Khaled Hosseini's A Thousand Splendid Suns and in Richard Eberhart’s “The Fury of Bombardment.” …show more content…

In chapter 42, Hosseini tells us that the Buddha statues in Bamiyan Laila saw were destroyed by the Taliban since they were objects of “idolatry and sin” (161). In the first chapters of the book, Laila’s father takes her and her soon to be lover Tariq to these statues. Hosseini also tells us that Laila’s father (Babi) sees a lot of potential in Laila, and she could be a symbol of hope to a new Afghanistan. These Buddha statues were a big part of her life and all of a sudden they have been destroyed. Khaled Hosseini leaves this for the reader to figure out, but he is saying that this violence (warfare) is hurting Laila in many ways since she was the symbol of hope. To elaborate, Khaled Hosseini is showing us that hope is being destroyed as an effect of war, and war leads to hopelessness. To prove that Laila is feeling numb after this, Khaled Hosseini also says, “How could she care about statues when her own life was crumbling dust?” (161). This shows that not only Laila is a symbol of hope, but the two-thousand-year-old Buddha statues are a symbol of hope as well. The words “How could she care about the statues” show the reader that hope is already gone, since she has Rasheed to worry about, and the hope in Afghanistan is lost. Eberhart doesn’t use symbols, he uses two soldiers to represent war being destructive. It is implicitly shown, but Eberhart is specifically talking about World War II, since the poem was written in 1947, and he is talking about two people he knew who were soldiers. Stanza 4 says, “Of Van Wettering I speak, and Averill, Names on a list, whose faces I do not recall But they are gone to early death, who late in school Distinguished the belt feed lever from the belt holding pawl” (13-16). In these lines, Van Wettering

Get Access