preview

Walking In 16th Century Venice Summary

Decent Essays

Both Walking in Sixteenth Century Venice by De Vivo and Coffeehouses by Ozkocak are both very interesting in a sense that they focused on ordinary people’s ordinary lives instead of authority and illustrated history in the view of ordinary people. By focusing on the streets, De Vivo was able to specifically explain all different status of people on the street and Ozkocak was also able to describe the change in public space and its users by exploring the coffeehouses.
In Walking in Sixteenth Century Venice, the author is suggesting that by following people’s walking path, the society’s societal, cultural, and political style and values could be clearly shown. De vivo gave several examples but one thing which caught my eyes was the War of the Fist—young boys gathered together on the bridge and fought in order to show their power. This example clearly backs up his argument that walking not only shows the physical condition of the town, but also that era’s people’s life style and values; in this case, the displaying powerfulness to males was honorable and valuable in the late Renaissance. Furthermore, De Vivo describes …show more content…

Ozkocak is arguing that even though the males were divided into different stratum and had different reasons to gather in the coffeehouse, they could become socially inclusive in the coffeehouse by talking about political, societal, and religious issues. In addition, the author is emphasizing how the public spaces have crucial role in delivering and forming history. His precise description of interior design of the dwellings of that era surely proves how important was the public spaces – coffeehouse—was for the males since it was the only public space for the poor and was the provision of domestic hospitality for the wealthier

Get Access