Violent Comics Are the New Superheroes In the writing of Gerard Jones “Violent Media is Good for Kids” is very interesting essay in which he describes how violent media can help kids to overcome obstacles, but whether it is convincing or not, I am not truly sure because the way the essay is written is biased. Jones as writer is making this controversial topic to gain more audience to read his writings, in addition, this essay fails in detail, it needs more statistics to support the examples that Jones addresses in his essay. Also, we need more information about what is the opinion of parents of these kids that believed violet media is good so, we need the statistics of the studies of the psychologist that support the idea of good …show more content…
a psychologist did with urban teens. He said that “Children need violence entertainment to explore the inescapable feelings that they have been taught to deny and to reintegrate those feelings into a more complex selfhood” (200). This is another good point that Jones gave to convince people that violent media is good, but this example is needs more statistic on the results on the use of violent comics in other areas because this is limited to urban kids only and this characteristic created a doubt of the studies that the psychologist did to support the idea
According to Gerard Jones, violent media can have positive effects on young people. Violent media can help them to overcome difficulties and they can have a positive influence on children because the kids uses violent stories to meet their emotional and developmental needs. Jones makes some good points. One example that Jones gives is “Pretending to have superhuman powers helps children conquer the feelings of powerlessness that inevitably come with being so young and small.” (200). This example that Jones used to prove that superheroes helps this children with the superpower that they have is a weak statement because is biased. He is a comic writer. When he gives this point is creating more interest in his stories that he writes not necessary in the real problem that the children have. Also, where are the statistics that prove the ages and location of these kids
Violent media exposure of children or adults to violent media is a cause of aggression and violent behavior has been one of the most intensely debated issues in criminal justice and the broader populace. Concern have come and gone that media such as comic books, as well as television and movies, would lead to waves of rebelliousness, violence, and moral degradation. Sherry
I am with Gerard Jones with that comics and video games don’t turn kids into violent. A reason is that I been playing video games since I was in middle school, and I’ve play killing games and never once in my life have I have never felt like killing someone or doing something bad. I feel parents are more protected today and against anything that has a little bit of violence or blood, and that is where Gerard Jones steps in and says comics help kids not hurt them. Many parents believe children that demonstrate acts of violence are linked to violent media such as comics and video games.
The article on violent media is good for kids By: Gerald Jones was a fantastic article. In the article Jones talks about how certain forms of violent media is good for children. There are all a lot of points that go with his statement, or go against it. In this paper I will be talking about Jones’s ideas and point of view on his article.
In the article, “Violent Media Is Good for Kids”, the author, Gerard Jones, begins by providing background information about himself. As a child, Jones was taught that violence was wrong, and as he grew up, he learned that violent comics and stories aided him to become an action movies and comic book writer. In his article, the author addresses why violent media are good for children. He points out that it helps them transform better socially, explore and conquer their feelings, and improves self-knowledge. Jones purpose is to inform readers about the positive use of violent media on children. The author uses rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, and stylistic techniques such as allusions and repetitions to create his argument.
From early childhood, parents, teachers, and other adults instill in us that violence is bad and unethical. We can all agree that we should avoid certain forms of violent behavior if possible; however, it is incorrect to assume that all forms of violence is bad. In his article "Violent Media is Good For Kids", Gerald Jones argues that "creative violence" such as gory video games, Comic books, and play fighting give children tools to master rage and actually help more kids than they hurt. What the author is saying here is correct because children use these types of influences in imaginary play at a young age,
Violent Media Is Good for Kids by Gerard Jones is a very well written essay. It explains the basic factors of violent media and the positive effects of it on the children. However, is this really true? Are the children really benefiting from watching violent shows? Are violent video games helping out the children? Answer to these questions is no. Violence was never good and never will be. Violent Media is a weapon that is mostly used in many countries for destruction and criticizing the political system. Lastly, it is best to shield our children from all forms of violence.
Most parents are very protective of their young children. They feel that if their impressionable young children aren’t exposed to violent media they would be less likely to act out. Gernard Jones in “Violent Media is Good for Kids” argues that the positive effects of violent media, including certain video games and gangster rap, far exceeds the minimal negative effects. I agree with Jones’s controversial stance on this topic. Sorry to break it to any parents who aren’t aware, children grow older and at some point in their life they will get mad, possibly even violent. It’s going to happen an unnumberable amount of times and there is nothing that can be done to completely eliminate this reaction which is a central part of human nature. As Jones
While it gives the impression that Gerald Jones could be wrong in his arguments, there is an aspect of truth at least from his case studies he took in his research. In addition, while no one would support exposure of the young children to violence and violent scenes, not at least in a stable civilization like America, it is quite evident that violent media provides the children and the young people in the society with certain message in life. It becomes clear that the
From infancy onward, parents and teachers have drilled into the young generation that violence should be avoided at all costs. They have preached cooperation, tolerance, and “using one’s words” as tactics to combat difficult situations. Although those lessons are valid, Gerald Jones claims there is an alternative way. In his essay, “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” Jones argues that “creative violence- bonking cartoons, bloody videogames, toy guns-gives children a tool to master their rage” (Jones). In other words, media violence, used correctly, can serve as an alternative method for powering through adolescence. By reading and writing violent stories, children are able to express
In the writing of Gerard Jones “Violent Media is Good for Kids” is a very interesting essay in which he describes how violent media can help kids to overcome obstacles. Also, he describes that some kids that used to be shy become outgoing by reading comics, he makes his point by saying the kids who reads this comic, get confident by identifying with the superheroes of the stories that they read. He gave examples of kids that were treated with violent media, but I am not truly sure if this is effective in kids or not because in the examples that he gave needs more details on how they become effective in helping these kids with their problems, also this point will be more persuade if the author supports his examples with information of the parents of these kids that believed violent media is good.
There are two assumptions in the Jones’s article, and one of them is underlying. When Jones asserts violent media embolden himself and his son to overcome fear and be brave to everything, it strongly imply people gain confidence by watching violent media. Another of the author’s assumption is that violent media teach children to control their emotion. In the article, Jones states “people pulling themselves out of emotional traps by immersing themselves in violent stories” and “Pretending to have superman powers helps children conquer the feeling of powerlessness…” to assume violent media assists children when they are facing emotional issues. While children cannot take control of their emotions, the superheroes in the violent media become an
Gerard Jones believes that violent media has helped hundreds of people for everyone it has hurt, and it can help far more if we learn to use it well because it can serve as a useful function for younger people. Gerard Jones goes further into detail stating that he believes violence media are a positive influence due to the fact that it helps children push back against a modern culture that cultivates fear and teaches dependency. Jones makes a very good and valid point where he states that “creative violence” gives children a tool to master their rage which is positive because rage can be an energizing emotion, a shot of courage to push us to resist greater threats, take more control, than we ever thought we could. “Children need violent entertainment
“Violent media is good for kids” is a fascinating article written by Gerard Jones. He makes an argument about how many forms of creative violence help many more children than they harm by giving them a tool to master their rage. At thirteen years of age he explains how forms of violence have been insightful and impactful for him. Growing up alone and afraid Gerard was taught by his parents that rage was something to be overcome and that violence was wrong. He was placed in a small school he felt was wrong for him, but then he withdrew from his loneliness when he became introduced to Marvel comics. Specifically, a character in the Marvel comics he felt he could relate to named the Hulk caught his eye and freed
Violent media comes in all shapes and sizes. Kids and teens are exposed to violence every day of their life. Through music, gaming, tv shows, and the internet. “Prolonged exposure to such media portrayals results in increased acceptance of violence as an appropriate means of solving problems and achieving one's goals”( Media Violence). This proves that violence will be a key to achieving an objective. This is a negative effect on an exposure with violent media, having kids believe that you can get what you want through violence. This also proves that if a child would see themselves as the good guy, everyone that disagrees with this child must be a bad guy, which can cause a problem in an everyday life. “Children in grades 4 through 8 preferentially choose video games that award points for violence against others, and 7 of 10 children in grades 4 through 12 report playing M-rated (mature) games, with 78% of boys reporting owning M-rated games”( Media Violence). With this exposure at hand, and rewarding kids to commit violent acts toward others is a shoddy misuse of the media. This proves that at young minds are shaped towards violence, which can cause problems when they get older.
"Impact of media use on children and youth” explores the good and bad effects that media can have on a young child’s development both mentally and physically. In the beginning of the article, they provided examples of how watching television can expose young children to violence, sexuality, and offensive language. The author made an interesting point that connected an increase in violent behaviors with children who watch violent