Vaccines Source Analysis

Many parents are skeptical about getting their children vaccinated because of the fear that it may cause autism. The question of whether vaccines cause autism is still a controversial subject among many citizens today especially parents. Some citizens argue that vaccines are not safe and could potentially cause autism. Parents believe that vaccine caused their child to develop autism because autism symptoms become apparent around the same time that children were getting their routine vaccinations (WebMD). Many people believe that vaccines are completely safe and do not cause autism in fact some citizens argue that all children should be vaccinated to prevent sickness and serious diseases in fact there have been many studies conducted to prove that vaccines do not cause autism. Despite controversial claims, there is no scientific evidence that links vaccines to autism.

Doctor Andrew Wakefield’s study, published the 28th of February, 1998 in the scientific magazine The Lancet, is constantly cited as being the catalyst for the ongoing debate on whether or not vaccinations have any connections to autism. In the case of Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s study on the connections between autism and the M.M.R. (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine, proper scientific experimental procedures were not seen to, such as his not including a control group. That is to say, in an act transgressing scientific integrity, he documented the cases

After reading and hearing about multiple news reports about parents refusing to vaccinate their children over the years, it might come as a surprise that American children actually receive more vaccinations than ever before due to government policies. Less than 0.5 percent of children receive no vaccines at all. In Vaccine Nation, Elena Conis argues that the widespread adherence to vaccination is as important of a study as vaccine resistance is. She turns her perspective on to the spread of vaccines in the postwar era when new vaccines targeted the “milder” diseases of childhood such as measles, mumps, and whopping cough. More recently, vaccines have been developed and promoted that protect against diseases that largely affect adults. Elena

In fact, The BMJ, or the British Medical Journal, chimed in on Wakefield’s paper. “By the time the paper was finally retracted 12 years later, after forensic dissection at the General Medical Council’s (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing, few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically” (Godlee, “Wakefield’s”). Furthermore, Wakefield’s license to practice medicine was stripped away by Britain’s General Medical Council because of misconduct, including the time Wakefield paid his son’s friends £5 each to take blood samples during his son’s birthday party (Burns, “British”). More recent studies also prove that the vaccine-autism link is nonexistent. One study, performed by the Journal of Pediatrics, found that, “ … of MCO members, increasing exposure to antibody-stimulating proteins and polysaccharides in vaccines during the first 2 years of life was not related to the risk of developing an ASD” (Destefano, “Increasing”). In other words, having a young child exposed to the ingredients of vaccines does not result in the child developing autism (Destefano, “Increasing”).

According to American historian, David Oshinsky of the Wall Street Journal, “the controversy over vaccines is as old as the vaccination itself.” While both sides of the immunization controversy have gathered ample sources backing their claims throughout the duration of this controversy, the validity of the two sides couldn’t contrast more. The pro-vaccine advocates provide factual information supported by scientific research, while the anti-vaccine advocates make bold sensational statements that attempt to place blame for various diseases and genetic disorders on vaccines, while failing to support to any such claims with scientific evidence and instead substituting this with hearsay from media outlets and non-reputable sources. Regardless

In the documentary “The Vaccine War”, there was a woman from Ashland, Oregon who’s main concern was that the vaccines being administered were causing more damage than good. I am not sure exactly as to how she can up with that theory but the mother stated the vaccines were not necessary. As a mother i can understand being frightened by the thought of medicine causing damage but it has been proven that vaccines have actually helped saved lives by preventing diseases that children used to most commonly get.There is a huge debate going on currently in regards to vaccines in children. In recent news during the second Republican Presidential Debate on September 16th, hosted by CNN at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum in California, there was controversy between Dr. Carson and Donald Trump. Donald Trump has linked childhood vaccines to autism on multiple occasions, despite their being no evidence to link the two together. Trump started off his point by saying that “autism has become an epidemic.” Although there has been an increase in the diagnosis of autism in children, there is still no evidence supporting his theory. One of Trump’s main concerns was the over-grouping of vaccines. Meaning he rather have vaccines given over a period of time, rather than all at once. Although it has been theorized that giving children multiple vaccines at once is safe, Dr. Carson went to agree with Trump, stating: “It is true that that we are probably giving way too many in too short of a period of time”. The controversy between vaccines and autism is causing fear in parents. It is taking away from their will to protect, and prevent harm from their children. We need accurate facts and

Since vaccines were invented 1924, vaccinations have prevented 103 million cases of polio, measles, rubella, mumps, hepatitis A, diphtheria, and pertussis (Welch, 2014, ¶10).

The current issue I have selected to discuss is vaccinations. In particular, I will be addressing the anti-vaccination movement that has gained popularity in recent years and the contributing biases that influenced its emergence. One event stands out at as a major contributing factor to the growth of the anti-vaccination movement, the 1998 study by Andrew Wakefield that was published by the English medical journal, Lancet. This study claimed to show a connection between the MMR vaccine and autism. Even though it was just one small study, the media picked it up and it became hugely publicized.

In 1998 Dr. Andrew Wakefield published a study in the Lancet showing a connection between vaccines and autism. Daley and Glanz explain that this appears to be the beginning of the doubts surrounding vaccinations. Here Daley and Glanz do not pull any punches. Daley and Glanz use crippling words to destroy Dr. Wakefield’s corrupt study. Each sentence in this paragraph digs Wakefield’s study a deeper and deeper hole. By doing this, Daley and Glanz paint an image that the whole anti-vaccine movement is constructed on a non-existent

In 1998 a study was published by Andrew Wakefield theorizing that there was a link between autism symptoms and receiving a MMR vaccination. However, his findings are to be inconclusive considering he did not take the proper procedures to conduct a controlled study. First, he did not include control subjects in his study, so the results cannot be compared properly if there were any changes in the subjects. Second, the endoscopic or neuropsychological assessments were not done blind and the data was not collected systematically or completely. Third, the symptoms found between the children with autism and gastrointestinal problems were inconsistent. In reality, many health groups are theorizing that a vaccination does not cause autism by any

This article examines the cases that when children receive shots at a young age such as the meningitis, chicken pox vaccines have caused autism in younger children. The specific facts I want to use 473 children had found no difference in the rates of autism between those who had received the MMR vaccine and those who had not received it. The author's article was published on "NewsWeek" which adds ethos to my paper. I like this article it goes into depth about the possible that child vaccinations may cause autism.

These five articles talk about the opposite side of the debate on vaccines and show what the parents think about this debate, these articles show where the distrust comes from and how parents are manipulated to believe unaccredited claims. In Kluck’s article she writes, “She (a nurse) assured me in vague terms that it was completely safe and I had nothing to worry about.” We see a common trend in these articles and that is doctors/ nurses give the parents vague terms to assure them that their children will be fine and that the vaccines are completely safe; but parents want more than a nurse telling them, the vaccine is very safe and it is very rare for children to have side effects. They want evident with facts and test to prove it. However, some test that parents find are found to be severely manipulated, in John E. Calfee’s article we see him talk about an article written by “Andrew Wakefield and coauthored by 12 others, the article wrote

Parents questioning vaccination after the Wakefield scandal may also turn to the Internet for answers, and would find numerous results to support both sides of the vaccination argument. If a parent was to Google “vaccines cause autism” G. DeLong’s 2011 article titled “A Positive Association found between Autism Prevalence and Childhood Vaccination uptake across the U.S. Population” may pop up. While her article appears to be an official, academic article to an unsuspecting parent, Gayle DeLong is not a scientist, and while her research should not be considered credible, the appearance of the article leads me to believe that some parents may find the article credible and list it as

published a controversial study in British journal Lancet where he linked MMR vaccination to autism. (Should I include what his study was based on and results?) Years later, many other studies proved it wrong but mistrust of science and mistrust of government is still there (2011). For example, Phea Paul study stated that there is no evidence that autism is cause by any vaccine and therefore no reason for parents to deny a child protection in today’s vaccines offered (2009). His study shows that if comparing risks mathematically of death or disability as a result of not vaccination a child which are small, to the risks of causing an autism spectrum disorder by immunizing it increases significantly.

When some people are against vaccines, they are normally against vaccines because of their religion, belief system, or because people think vaccines cause autism. Others fight for a choice for their child who wouldn't be able to otherwise make their choice because they are too young to know what is happening. A lot of people are against vaccines because of their beliefs, they really shouldn't be because vaccines have seriously helped with diseases that have been harassing humanity for many years like smallpox, the flu, and whooping cough. In recent years, people have not been getting vaccinated by not having their child or themselves vaccinated, and this is the main leading cause of diseases rising again that were nearly eradicated like whooping