preview

Compare Daley And Glanz

Decent Essays

In recent years, there has been a growing number of parents who refuse to get their children vaccinated. It appears this refusal to vaccinate stems from a fear over the safety of vaccines, and the effect that they will have on their child. This fear is perpetuated by opinion, false studies, and conspiracy, spread by bias media outlets as well as scientists who are incentivized to fabricate this misinformation. Unfortunately, this has led to pocketed outbreaks of diseases such as whooping cough and measles. These diseases were previously a thing of the past, that is, until recently. These outbreaks have led to the tragic, and untimely deaths of several children, and has put many other children at risk. Pediatrician, Matthew Daley, and epidemiologist, …show more content…

They move onto how pediatricians fail to start the conversation about vaccines during pregnancy, and instead wait until the 2 month well-baby visit. This is important because by the 2 month follow up, parents have already read a plethora of article pertaining to vaccines and formed an opinion. By removing the attention from the parents and onto health care providers, Daley and Glanz make the reader feel less attacked and tactfully place blame onto the child’s pediatrician. From here, the article begins to take on a tone of failure and disappointment. Daley and Glanz explain how it would take no more than 20 minutes for a pediatrician to explain to parents the importance of vaccinations. They mention time frames like this multiple times in their article. Putting an emphasis on how long this discussion would take makes the reader feel this failure and disappointment on the part of the doctor. At this point in the article Daley and Glanz had me wanting to point the finger at doctors and healthcare. They had me feeling as though the cause of the anti-vaccination movement stemmed from the rush and lack of thoroughness on the part of the …show more content…

In 1998 Dr. Andrew Wakefield published a study in the Lancet showing a connection between vaccines and autism. Daley and Glanz explain that this appears to be the beginning of the doubts surrounding vaccinations. Here Daley and Glanz do not pull any punches. Daley and Glanz use crippling words to destroy Dr. Wakefield’s corrupt study. Each sentence in this paragraph digs Wakefield’s study a deeper and deeper hole. By doing this, Daley and Glanz paint an image that the whole anti-vaccine movement is constructed on a non-existent

Get Access