Utilitarianism:
Should You Sacrifice Your Happiness? Would you be willing to sacrifice something that you really care about for the greater good? Utilitarianism is the theory that we should do what is best for the world as a whole, even if that means that there will be some unhappiness. It is the ethical theory that I believe I base most of my moral judgments on, but as with anything, there are flaws to this theory. Utilitarianism, defined as "the theory that an action is right if it seeks to promote the greatest amount of happiness in the world at large". This theory was started with the philosophies of Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). "Utilitarianism gets its name from Bentham’s test question, “What is the
…show more content…
Most people already use some form of utilitarianism when making moral decisions in their everyday life so it is quite easily to adapt and naturally follow the philosophy. Another reason is because it moves away from the idea of the will of God and is based on the what is pleasurable for us. With utilitarianism, it is not just our very own happiness that we have to consider, it is the happiness of all those who will be affected by the decision. The question that is asked in utilitarianism is "What should a person do?" The answer is that questions is, a person should act so as to produce the best consequences possible. When looking at the consequences of such actions, we have to determine whether they are good or bad, right or wrong. But what is good? According to Bentham's view called hedonism, "the only thing that is good in itself is pleasure (or happiness)". Many people object to hedonism because pleasure and pain are things that we feel. They see these things to be intrinsic goods that are not feelings. While others think that our desires and preferences determine how we value things which could cause conflict, if people strongly valued …show more content…
One argument is that it is unpredictable. We cannot predict the future and most of the time, things do not turn out the way that we thought they would. Therefore, we can't judge an action as being right or wrong based on outcomes that come down to chance. Another argument is justice. Our view of justice is that everyone should be treated fairly. Utilitarianism allows us to sacrifice individuals for the greater good. Many people would see this as unfair. In an article I read online, the author makes a very good point about how utilitarianism cannot protect the rights of minorities. In his example he says, " if the goal is the greatest good for the greatest number. Americans in the eighteenth century could justify slavery on the basis that it provided a good consequence for a majority of Americans. Certainly the majority benefited from cheap slave labor even though the lives of black slaves were much worse." With an argument like that, it is hard to fully agree with the theories of
Utilitarianism considers the pleasure and pain of every individual affected by an action. It also considers everyone to be equal and does not permit an individual to put their interests or relationships first. After this it attempts to provide an objective, quantitative method for making moral decisions. Utilitarianism is not able to assign quantitative measures to all pleasures and pains, and does not address the issue of some pleasures and pains that cannot or should not be measured-such as human life or human suffering.
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory with the rule, “act in such a way as to maximize the expected satisfaction of interests in the world, equally considered.” We try to act in such a way that considers everyone’s pains and pleasures. With this in mind, we have to discover what truly makes others happy. We should not ignore those that are affected by our behavior.
153). In essence, utilitarianism is maximizing everyone’s happiness, which can almost be considered a universal acceptance (Boylan, 2009, p. 154). Jeremy Bentham is one of the proponents of modern utilitarianism and states, “nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure” (Boylan, 2009, p. 154). In business utilitarianism shares the nonmoral views that the best decision that had no moral conflict would be to maximize profit, which would be the greatest good of the company and its employees (Boylan, 2009, p. 162). Utilitarianism does not always hold true in some minds. Utilitarianism does not take into account motives of the people (Boylan, 2009, p. 165). “If one acts in accord with the general principle and its corollaries, then one is moral” (Boylan, 2009, p. 165).
Utilitarianism is the ethical belief that the happiness of the greatest number of people is the greatest good. Jeremy Betham and John Stuart Mill are two philosophers that were leading advocates for the utilitarianism that we study today. In order to understand the basis of utilitarianism, one must know what happiness is. John Stuart Mill defines happiness as the intended pleasure and absence of pain while unhappiness is pain and the privation of pleasure. Utilitarians feel the moral obligation to maximize pleasure for not only themselves, but for as many people as possible. All actions can be determined as right or wrong based on if they produce the maximum amount of happiness. The utilitarian belief that all actions can be determined as right or wrong based only on their repercussions connects utilitarianism to consequentialism. Consequentialism is the belief that an action can be determined morally right or wrong based on its consequences. Just like any other belief system, utilitarianism faces immense amount of praise and criticism.
Throughout Philosophy, morality is a central theme. Although each scholar views the definition of morality differently, the goal of people to be better and think for themselves is the main focus. Many philosophers have defined and categorized utilitarianism in different ways. In normative ethics, Jeremy Bentham believes an action is right if it promotes happiness and wrong if it produces the reverse of happiness but not just the happiness of a person who performed the action but also everyone that was affected by it (Duignan). Utilitarianism is the view that the morally right action is the action that has the most good (Driver). The foundation of morality in utilitarianism comes from utility or intrinsic value (Skorupski 256). In utilitarianism actions are evaluated by their utility instead of intrinsic properties of the actions (Skorupski 256). Utilitarianism says certain acts are right or wrong in themselves making us perform them or do not do them at all. On the contrary, concepts of the good go hand and hand with that of rights and obligation causing obligation to be determined by intrinsic value (Skorupski 256). John Stuart Mill theory of utilitarianism reveals what is utilitarianism, the morality, proof of validity, and the connection between justice and utility in the study of thinking.
Jeremy Bentham was an English-born student of law and leader of a radical movement for social and legal reforms based on utilitarian principles. They said, The original utilitarian principle is democratic. They were democratic in the sense that they believed that social policy should work for the good of all people, not just the upper class. They believed that when interests of various people conflicted, the best choice was that which promoted the interests of the great number. Utilitarian reasoning can be used to justify a variety of actions and policy decisions. Utilitarianism suggests that we ought to consider the totality of consequences of a policy or action. Forms of utilitarianism will differ depending on how we understand what sorts of consequences or interests matter. Complexities arise in defining key concepts such as happiness, interest, and well-being. Utilitarianism also has to provide an account of whose interests or happiness matters. Jeremy Bentham, one of the founding fathers of utilitarianism, extended his utilitarian concern in a way that included all suffering beings, including nonhuman
Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that morality should be based on producing the most amount of happiness for the most about of people as possible with our actions. Utilitarianism is made up of three parts: consequentialism, hedonism, and impartiality. We must
As stated in the lecture video, Utilitarianism is that the goals of moral actions should be to increase the most lasting happiness for the most amount of people. So basically the amount of happiness and suffering created by a person's actions is what really matters. To reach this amount of happiness for everyone we may have to break traditional moral rules to achieve this outcome.
Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory that holds the morally right course of action in any given situation is the course of which yields the greatest balance of benefits over harms. More specifically, utilitarianism’s core idea is that the effects of an action determine whether actions are morally right or wrong. Created with the philosophies of Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806–1873), Utilitarianism began in England in the 19th Century. Bentham and Mill built their system of Utilitarianism on ancient hedonism (pursuing physical pleasure and avoiding physical pain). Although both of these philosophers agreed on the basic principals of Utilitarianism they disagreed on what exactly hedonism is.
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that has long been the subject of philosophical debate. This theory, when practiced, appears to set a very basic guideline to follow when one is faced with a moral dilemma. Fundamental Utilitarianism states that when a moral dilemma arises, one should take action that causes favorable results or reduces less favorable results. If these less favorable results, or pain, occur from this action, it can be justified if it is produced to prevent more pain or produce happiness. Stating the Utilitarian view can summarize these basic principles: "the greatest good for the greatest number". Utilitarians are to believe that if they follow this philosophy, that no matter what action they take, it
Utilitarianism is a theory of one’s consequences. It is the cumulative of happiness amongst a number of individuals. Utilitarian’s can only determine if one’s actions is morally good or bad depending on the outcome of that action. In other words, the consequences in regard to an action did benefit the happiness of a high number of individuals involved. Bentham and Mill believed that all individuals matter including animals but humans mattered more.
Utilitarianism is a consequential theory by not only a matter of what we are capable of emotionally doing but to also do a matter of what we ought to do rationally. Actions to benefit the majority to maximize happiness for the greater of good of people and minimize unhappiness. Utilitarian is a hard universal theory for the universal moral code that applies to everyone to maximize happiness and minimize misery or unhappiness for the great of good. In the matter in which peoples consequences are cause not by actions. Two of the well-known philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stewart Mill’s understand the principle of utility in their own ways. For Jeremy Bentham moral theory he founded that the consequences of human actions count in evaluating in what kind of consequence to what matter for human happiness is just an achievement of pleasure to avoid pain. Bentham argues that the value of a human being action is easily calculated by how intensely pleasure is felt and how long the pleasure lasts to how certainly and how quickly it follows upon the performance of the action taken place for the person. It matters to an account of how to value life in every action the human does to avoid harm to themselves or others. Bentham also used the hedonistic calculus a method of working out the greatest amount of possible alternatives choices in terms of the amount of pleasure to gain and to avoided pain. As Mills theory is an extended explanation of utilitarian moral theory to an effort
Utilitarianism is one of the most commonly used ethical theories from the time it was formulated by Jeremy Bentham and John Stewart Mill in the nineteenth century. In his work, Utilitarianism, Bentham “sought to dispel misconceptions that morality has nothing to do with usefulness or utility or that morality is opposed to pleasure” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 53). To simplify the utilitarian principle, which is one of utility, one can surmise that morality is equated with the greatest amount of utility or good for the greatest number of people (MacKinnon, 2012). Also, with its orientation to the “end or goal of actions” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 54), Utilitarianism thus, espouses the consequentialist principle, e.g., the evaluation of any human act lies not so much in the nature of the act or the drive behind the act but rather the result of the act (MacKinnon, 2012).
Utilitarianism is a theory aimed at defining one simple basis that can be applied when making any ethical decision. It is based on a human’s natural instinct to seek pleasure and avoid pain.
Utilitarian is described as “the ethical doctrine that virtue is based on utility, and that conduct should be directed toward promoting the greatest happiness of the greatest number of persons” (2). Bentham described this as the greatest happiness principle or being “Utilitarian.” His moral philosophy indicated there are two things that drive humans pleasure and