There are many political views concerning abortion in the UK, Downing Street has said there are no plans to change the legal limit on abortions after the health secretary Jeremy Hunt said that he would support a reduction form 24 weeks to 12 weeks. The department of health said that 91% of abortions are performed under 13 weeks which is what Hunt wanted. David Cameron argued that he would personally favour a modest reduction form 24, he believed that there is a medical argument for that, he said “I don't agree with the 12-week limit and that's not the government's policy”. The conservative party said that Jeremy Hunt has not used his position to bring that about, accepting that such change is a matter for private members, not government legislation.
Confidentiality - When assessing a child or young person it is important to gain the permission of parents/carers as well as the young person themselves if they are old enough to understand. You should always make sure that notes of assessments are kept safe and private & only discuss the assessment with the correct members of staff. If training and you want to use an assessment as evidence than no names should be used on generic references such as Child A.
If we want to analyse the political factors which impact upon the company we need to make a general view of the situation in the country. What are its law and requirements?
The Government is at a point of decision as to where they want to abolish late term abortions, while they are at this point of decision they use spurious as well as flagrant information to throw out into the media to coerce citizens to object on legalizing late term abortions. The Government should not be held up to any right to illegalize abortion as well as portray it as a horrific act as to which they classify it as a,“Termination of pregnancy” . late term abortions need to be legalized, for it will save lives of many. Mothers as well as babies will be saved from a painful and traumatic life. In which late term abortions are only performed under the circumstances to where the mothers or the infant's life is in danger.
regarding human life, ranging from pro-choice activism to the position that defends the life of the foetus on all circumstances. Politically speaking, these views correspond to Conservatism versus Liberalism in most political systems and debates also show a political background on this issue. The convictions are also broad; those who say that abortion is murder even in a case as severe as when the pregnancy is induced by rape and those who claim that abortion has to be a human right in every possible way and that it has to be allowed in practice as late as 24 weeks (which is medically deemed to be the maximum allowed time of a safe abortion) of pregnancy1. Religious belief also casts a major influence in the opinion-shaping of the general society and therefore the policies and legislations are influenced by the public opinion to some degree, in part because, the politicians and judges are also the part of the same society and in part due to the law-makers practice of appeasing the society and its current norms (For instance, it is not credible to think of liberal legislations in a community that holds conservative ideals). So the cultural and religious background of the society is what ultimately
For our week-long nutrition study, we decided to make three graphs: A bar graph, a scatter plot, and a box plot. For the bar graph, we wanted to compare protein, fat, sodium, and sugar because although they are not huge, we thought they should still be represented. As for the scatter plot, we analyzed our caloric intake per day throughout the week because we wanted to see how much we eat by day. And for the final graph, the box plot, we found the spread of how many grams of carbs we had per meal, as carbs is one of the biggest nutrition components.
The issue of abortion is a tough, important, and long-lived one because there are numerous factors to consider and many people with strong opinions with the proof to support them. There are religious claims, human rights that need to be protected, attempts to avoid psychological damages, and even funding issues that are equally important, with evidence to support either side. Our overall position on this issue is to keep abortion as a legal institution in America. But the graphic condition of abortion procedures mandates that partial birth abortions, except in the cases of rape, incest, danger the woman’s health, or fetal abnormality, are strictly prohibited. Seeing that “58% favor the
There are few issues in America as emotionally-charged as abortion. Although abortion became legal in 1973, very few American women have access to terminating an unwanted pregnancy. Abortion or abortion repeal is a major platform issue for modern American politicians. That politicians, rather than doctors or scientists, determine American abortion policies shows clearly how science has been hijacked by vote-hungry politicians. For these politicians, getting votes is far more important than learning the truth about women’s welfare, genetics and fetal development.
Agreeing to a time-based restriction could protect older fetuses and still safeguard the rights of most of the women seeking abortions, who are usually within 12 weeks of pregnancy. Coming to an agreement as to when the fetus is truly alive, is the next step to coming to a time-based restriction agreement. Medical science has advanced the ability of the fetus to survive outside the womb from about 28 weeks to about 23 to 24 weeks. Since the progression of medical technology is always changing, suggestions for compromise propose a cutoff date for elective abortions at eight to sixteen weeks, which is well before viability (Flanders 25). One of the strictest proposals includes prohibiting abortions after approximately the eighth week when fetal brain waves can be detected. Some say that this is appropriate because this is the same way that doctors determine the end of a person’s life. Some supporters go so far as to say that there should be a sixteen week allowed time period, opposed to the eight week. Pro-choice people argue that this restriction would be less objectionable than the eight-week restriction since ninety percent of all abortions are performed within the twelfth week of pregnancy (Driefus 101). Millions of pro-choicers and pro-lifers believe that any such compromise would be impossible. From different ends of the argument, they criticize any proposal of time limits that would violate the rights of women or violate the rights of fetuses. They all agree
Abortion has been a controversial topic for centuries not only in the United States but also in the other parts of the world. Politicians always struggle to strike a balance between the rights of the unborn and the rights of the pregnant woman.
Public opinion presents an important part when deciding a stance. Class, location, beliefs, age, and political affiliations contribute to the difference of opinion among people. According to an article printed in Political Behavior, authors Wlezein and Goggin suggest that public opinion on abortion varies little through the years with a large increase in the 1980’s that resulted in the majority of the public being in favor of abortion “as it is now” (Wlezien, 381). Since the decision of Roe V. Wade in 1973, approximately 23% of adults believe abortion should be legal in all cases, 19% believe it should be illegal in all cases and a majority of 56% believe it should be legal in some cases (Wlezien, 381). Wlezein and Goggin conducted a general social survey that indicated that an overwhelming majority of at least 81% proved that a legal abortion should be possible if the woman’s health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy, if she became pregnant as a result of a rape, or if there is a strong possibility of a defect in the baby (Witwer). Though this data is from 1989, a poll conducted in 1999
Gallagher Construction and Development are based in north London. They are a property development and refurbishment company. They have been in the construction industry for about twenty five years. They have a workforce of twenty directly employed and about fifty self employed workers at the moment.
Carol Everett once said “The product abortion, is skillfully marketed and sold to the women at a crisis time in her life. She buys the product, finds it defective and wants to return it for a refund, but it is too late.” Abortion is one of the most controversial topics amongst not only politicians but also every human being alive; rather they are pro-choice or pro-life. I am personally in between; I believe that is the choice of that particular woman. We can not as a society decide the choices of others, especially if it is not a written law. But also I believe that it is murder. It was in 1973 when the Roe v Wade case abolished all laws prohibiting abortion.
We must stand up to politicians who want to restrict a woman's ability to make her own health care decisions in consultation with her doctor” (@ppact). Some people have their morals on the rights and wrong about things, one saying it’s murder to kill the baby inside of you. But I also believe that some things aren’t proper or the right to do to the person's body with
This news article maintains a neutral standpoint on the issue of abortion, favouring neither side of the pro-life vs. pro-choice debate. However, while it does not outwardly endorse the upcoming amendments, it includes a number of quotations from the pro-choice perspective, which suggests that the increased access to abortion in NI is reflective of progress in the United Kingdom (UK). The Guardian’s Jessica Elgot and Henry McDonald report that Theresa May is willing to make concessions on NI’s abortion laws, so that women in NI are not financially responsible for terminating their pregnancy. The report indicates that prior to the proposed amendments, women from NI have to pay £900 to go from NI to mainland England in order to procure an abortion. The report further states that many British MP’s are praising the government’s concessions, particularly Mrs. Leadsom, who has been vocal about making further amendments to the law. A look at the quotations included in the article further show that the issue being addressed surrounds the accessibility of health care for women throughout the UK. The article does not any data or pro-life argumentation in its presentation of the news; it emphasizes the woman’s freedom to
• Australia has positive relations with many countries. TORSTAR has relationships with individuals and companies across Europe (including the United Kingdom) and the United States. Many of the clients are based in the US with TORSTAR bringing their brands over to Australian markets. As mentioned beforehand, TORSTAR has been involved with moving well-known American companies like Sephora and the British brand TopShop into the Australian market. Additionally, TORSTAR is now working on expanding Australian companies such as Sukin and Freeze-Frame to consumers and retailers globally.