SFT vs. CBT Theoretical Underpinnings As Insoo Kim Berg, MSW and Steve de Shazer, M.S. (Solution Focused, n.d), explained the theoretical underpinnings of Solution-Focused Therapy (SFT) in this week's video, I made note of several similarities and differences between SFT and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). One of the first things Insoo Kim Berg, MSW mentioned was the difference between who was considered the expert: the client or the therapist. SFT views the client as the expert above all else. Steve de Shazer indicated that the client and the therapist often had a difference of opinion as to what a successful solution looked like, and since the client is the customer and the one who has to live with the outcome, it is they who gets to …show more content…
One of the biggest underpinnings related to CBT is the cognitive triangle which indicates actions are related to behaviors which are related to thoughts. It is the focus of CBT to identify the root cause of many of the thoughts which lead a person to act the way they do. SFT on the other hand takes a here and now approach, with minimal focus on the past. Rather than trying to get rid of the problem, SFT encourages the client to identify a solution that is already there and figure out what needs to be done to get there. As an example, de Shazer (Solution Focused, n.d) identified the strength of an individual with substance abuse issues who manages to stay alive in twenty below temperatures. Additionally, CBT seems to focus considerably on the actions, thoughts, and behaviors associated with a problem, while SFT aims to steer away from the problem and encourages discussion of Exceptions, or times when client could have participated in the problem behavior but did …show more content…
Additionally, before getting into the depth of the issue both theories discuss client goals and motivation in order to determine if that therapeutic style will align with the clients’ needs. CBT therapists use the first session or two to complete a problem analysis, perform a detailed assessment and create a case formulation with the client. The therapist seeks to identify: 1) the behaviors, emotions, and thoughts which make the situation a problem, 2) predisposing factors, often going back to childhood and adolescents, 3) precipitants, 4) protective factors, 5) triggers, 6) symptoms, and 7) maintenance cycles (O’Connell, 2012). This starts the session out with a very problem-focused discussion encouraging growth of the problem, with goal setting often not starting until the second
Solution focused therapy was developed in the late 1970’s by Husband and wife team Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg. Steve de Shazer was a scholar as well as a clinician, who was intrigues by Bateson’s theories of communication and Milton Erickson’s pragmatic ideas about how to influence change (Nichols, 2013). These differences stuck a cord with de Shazer and generated the theory that helped develop the solution focused therapy model. Along de Shazer and Berg, they also collaborated with several of their colleagues at the Medical Research Institute, also known as MRI, located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. As the name suggests, Solution focused therapy is future focused, goal directed and focuses on the solutions of the problems. This form of therapy is also brief and the session are generally no longer than 8 weeks maximum.
This paper will focus on client’s presenting concerns and her biopsysocial system. Reader will explore how Solution Focused Therapy and Harm Reduction Therapy are relevant to client’s problems and why they would be most effective for client. Two intervention models that are relevant to the theories chosen will be outlined and how they relate to the client. An intervention plan that includes goals for the client will be evaluated and measured. Finally, the paper will discuss how the model chosen for intervention will have an impact on the macro level of change.
Solution-focused therapy was developed in 1982 at The Brief Family Therapy Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin (). SFBT was inspired by Milton Erickson and MRI models, both Insoo and Steve de Shazer Kim Berg had worked on the MRI models which SFBT is created from (Mo Yee Lee, 2011). Solution-Focused Brief Therapy is theoretically based, evidence-based, empirical researched and has been clinically practice for the past 32 years (). The assumption and basic premises of SFBT emphasized by the creators is that its merely about the techniques and more about its logic/rational (). To effectively execute SFBT it requires the clinician to “deeply” understands and the concepts to influence clients change (). Why does SFBT standout amongst others models, because SFBT practice is rooted in the present and future. The focus is not on exploring
Beck. According to Corey, this popular approach is based on the assumption that what people believe influences how they act and feel (p 236). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is known because of its effectiveness. According to Bayle & Nevel (2015), “The main objective of CBT is to alleviate distress by modifying cognitive content and process, in the process realigning thinking with reality by directly challenging maladaptive thoughts” (p. 26). The use of CBT allows the therapist to help the client reframe his/her negative thoughts into a more positive thought or outlook in a situation. The therapist is allowing the client to understand how to take a different approach in considering any given situation. Building rapport with a client would be beneficial in the process of applying this theory. A strong rapport between the client and the therapist will provide room for him/her to accept new advice and give reasons for the client to want to change negative outcomes.
Solution focused therapy is a model of therapy developed by Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg in the late 1970's (Dolan, n.d.). This model has become well known for its non-traditional approach to client problems as it does not explore clients issues in relation to their cause and affect but rather the goals and solutions to achieving a future free of any present issues. i will be discussing the evident concepts, principles and intervention techniques of this particular model. it will be explored in the context of a case scenario of a therapy session to observe how the model can be actively applied to therapy sessions and why this is the best model to meet the client's needs. The effectiveness of the model
The need for an alternative approach to therapy was recognized as mental health practitioners began to observe the amount of energy, time, money, and other resources spent discussing and analyzing the challenges revealed during the therapy process, while the issues originally bringing an individual to therapy continued to have a negative impact. Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg of the Brief Family Therapy Center in Milwaukee, along with their team, developed solution-focused brief therapy in the early 1980s in response to this observation. SFBT aims to develop realistic solutions as quickly as possible, rather than keeping people in therapy for long periods of time, in order to promote lasting relief for those in therapy.
Solution Focus Brief Therapy is an evidence based theoretical approach that was founded by Steve, De Shazer, co-founded by Insoo, Kim Berg, and their team while they worked at the Brief Therapy Center in Milwaukee. (De Shazer, 1985, 1988, 1991, 1994; De Shazer et al.1986) and Insoo Kim Berg, (1994). The theory consist of two concepts developing conversation and reaching a
CBT is defined as a form of mental health based counseling, focusing on errors of cognition and perception. It usually involves a limited number of individual outpatient sessions (Park et al., 2013). This form of therapy, “helps you become aware of inaccurate or negative thinking, so you can view challenging situations more clearly and respond to them in a more effective way,” (“Cognitive behavioral therapy”, 2014, para. 1).
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a widely utilized intervention within the field of social work practice. According to Hepworth (2011), it is considered to be the cornerstone of cognitive behavioral approaches (p.408-09). CBT focuses on the premise that thoughts trigger an emotional response, which in turn triggers a behavior. It states that all behaviors are internally derived from our thoughts instead of being externally triggered. CBT is short term in duration and can provide rapid emotional progress since it is solution focused, often using concrete homework assignments to be able to assist clients in refocusing their current paradigm into something more constructive and positive in nature. Within CBT, the success (or failure) of client work is based upon accurate assessment and clear goal setting. It is the social worker’s role to hold the client accountable, encourage, listen and educate the client on the impact of their behaviors. In contrast
In Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT), the therapist would help Jeffery by focusing on the result of the proposed treatment plan rather than the problems that brought him there in the first place. This goal oriented thought process places emphasis on the present and future in lieu of the past. Moreover, the therapist would ask Jeffrey to imagine what type of future he would like and then both he and therapist would team up to devise a course of action.
Solution-Focused Therapy (SFT) was drawn out from the work of Milton Erickson. Most people identify SFT with the variation work from Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg. Solution-focused therapy is a therapy that is action oriented and focuses on finding solutions. In SFT, the client is considered the expert (they know exactly what the problem is), and the client has the resources to find a solution. SFT does not focus on diagnoses or assessments but focuses on what the client brings to therapy. Depending on the client and the problem, SFT has a 50% successful rate. SFT has many techniques to use to assist in finding solutions for problems. These techniques range from questioning the client to having the client complete homework assignments.
Solution-focused therapy (SFT) is one among the many therapeutic approaches, which has its own benefits. First, it is refreshing as it focuses on human potential and growth by the therapist tapping into a client’s strengths and training them to use those strengths to cope (McCarthy & Archer, 2013). Second, the client is viewed as possessing the skills and capabilities, therefore, the therapist must take a step back, and not want to “fix” a client, rather assist by shifting the direction from the problem to their strengths (McCarthy & Archer, 2013). Third, SFT is of short duration lasting about 5 sessions, almost as much as other therapeutic sessions (McCarthy & Archer, 2013). Fourth, SFT is constantly changing and evolving, to personalize and individualize each session to each client, thus making it a great approach for clients of various multicultural backgrounds (McCarthy & Archer, 2013). Lastly, SFT can be beneficial to individuals that may need motivation, or a cheerleader/supporter. Through techniques which include “seeking exceptions to problems, mind mapping, accepting ownership of successes, cheerleading, scaling, overcoming obstacles to success, and constructing a counselor developed message that summarizes a counseling session for the client” (Fulthorp, 2015, p. 266).
“The Solution Focus Brief Therapy (SFBT) is all about solutions not to know much about the nature of the problems to solve, that customers want to change, and they have to do themselves (de Shazer (1988). A major factor in this questioning is the "miracle question," a question that encourages people to stop thinking about why they cannot achieve something and instead picture how their lives could be if a miracle occurred.( Davenport, Donna S.(2006). This helps them to see life in a very different way and divert attention from the cause of their problems. The Emphasis must be placed the on times when their problems are nonexistent. Ultimately, the miracle question allows the individual or couple to imagine a solution. Their answers are expected
While using SFT the clinician has several assumptions that guide the sessions. First, a client is competent to co-construct goals (Jong, 2015). Second, the client is the expert of their own life (Jong, 2015). Third, the problem and solution do not necessarily have a connection (Jong, 2015). Fourth, the client has to do something different for change to occur (Jong, 2015). Fifth,
CBT is an integrated approach using various combinations of cognitive and behavioral modification interventions and techniques (Myers, 2005). The aim is to change maladaptive patterns of thinking and behaving that impact clients in the present (Weiten et al., 2009). From a cognitive behavioral perspective Jane would be diagnosed as having faulty thinking and dysfunctional behavioral issues suffering from depression, and anxiety in the form of Agoraphobia (Weiten et al., 2009).