The Taming Of The Shrew Research Paper

Baptista Minola, the heavy-handed father in The Taming of the Shrew, can be characterized as having difficulty expressing his love effectively to his daughters Bianca and Katherine. While Bianca is charming, tranquil, and stunning, Katherine, being the shrew of the play, is hostile, peevish, and quick witted. After raising both daughters until the day of their marriage, Baptista has been caught in the middle of their opposing characteristics. Understandingly, his actions to deal with this discrepancy can be viewed as cruel and tyrannical; however, he is a loving father that cares deeply for his daughters and their well-being. Many readers only consider Baptista’s concern for the marriage of his daughters as cruel and the amount of wealth they may inherit as greedy when describing his manner and personality, but he acts with logic in each situation and values the happiness of his daughters.

Katherine Minola is a character who is pivotal to the progression of the exposition in Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew. The dynamic Kate faces everything from being unsolicited and undesirable by men, being forced into marriage, and falling in love with someone who undoubtedly mistreats her from the beginning. Being tossed and thrown from one end of the spectrum to the other allows room for drastic change in attitude, values, and behavior. There is much evidence of a revolution of character in Baptista’s daughter and Petruchio’s wife, Katherine. Reader’s can follow the transformation of an untamable shrew of society to a well loved and respectable woman figure of the upper class.

“When love speaks the voice of all the gods makes heaven drowsy with the harmony,” Taming of the Shrew, Act IV, scene II.

At several moments in the narration, the audience is presented with an externally obedient wife, but again, the utilization of first person reveals that the woman’s thought’s contradict with her actions somewhat. When admitting her unease with the estate, it is mentioned that John, her husband, mocks these fears by laughing. Soon after, the narrator redeems John by stating that that type of behavior and interactions between a two in marriage is common, and not hindering to anything. It is important to remember that the work is written in the 1800s, so this behavior was socially acceptable. However, in modern context, the belittling that occurs in the story is not redeemable; women are seen as equals and are treated accordingly.

I must and will have Katherine to my wife. (Act 2, Scene 1, Page 13)

Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare, the indication of a woman being the possession of her husband, and having to do everything that he proposes her to do is presented. Katherine has to acquire appropriate manners toward a man in advance before her sister Bianca can wed. Bianca wishes to marry one of her suitors/bachelors, but she can’t due to tradition because the older sister has to marry first.

William Shakespeare's Taming of the shrew is a very confusing book to read, especially since there are so many ways to read and interpret it. The book is perceived as a comedy but a very simple change in tone to some of the characters lines could make the play a drama or a tragedy. In “The Taming of the Shrew” a lot of things are assumed about the book that aren't for sure, such as, how the characters act, how they talk, their mannerisms, and how Kate is the shrew. We don't really know the answers to all the questions for sure. So who really is the shrew? Is it really Kate or is it someone else?

The Taming of the Shrew by Shakespeare is about a mean screw name Katherine who becomes tamed by the end of the novel. Katherine fought her husband until the very end. One might say that she became tamed because she had no choice. Another theory could be that Kathrine tamed herself but one thing is certain that without the primary character changing in some way by the experience of the story, the story has less meaning. Katherine sees herself in Petruchio's behavior and they both become tamed in relation to how they were acting prior to marriage.

The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare might appeal to Kalidasa because this play can be used to show the Hindu puranas and respect toward the deities. Kalidasa’s name means the “servant of Kali” which can suggest he is a follower of the deity Durga, who evolves in the form of Kali to destroy the demons. In the Taming of the Shrew, Katherine can represent the deity Durga/ Kali to reveal the two side of a female character. According to Hinduism, goddess Durga is the main force behind creation, preservation and destruction; similarly, a female like Katherine can very destructive by punishing her sister and being rude to her father. However, that same women, Katherine, can create a beautiful family bond and preserve the relationship with the force of love and affection. Furthermore, this play can be used to teach lessons toward the Indian society to treat women with respect and not consider them to be part of secondary status because of gender division or sexism. It can reveal to

Battle of the Sexes would have been another appropriate title for this play because the entire play is women verses men, men verses women. This battle of the sexes shows no boundaries between the rich and poor, young or old, man or women. The basis of all the rivalry stems from the fact that the men in this play look at the women as if they were objects, instead of human beings with feelings. This theory that women are merely objects creates an environment that the women have to adapt to and survive in and the environment of a person will depict what he or she will become, resulting in a battle between the sexes.

Have you ever heard of two stories in different time periods with characters following the same actions? This occurs in two different plays. Taming of the Shrew is a play written by William Shakespeare. In this play a high-class noble man, Petruchio, finds a woman, Katherine, he would like the marry but, makes the decision to tame her as well. Pygmalion is a play written by Bernard Shaw.

A dissembler is described by OED as someone who “dissembles; one who conceals his real purposes under a false appearance; one who practises duplicity; a deceiver; a hypocrite.” As such, the art of dissembling is a prominent concept in many of Shakespeare’s plays, particularly in Taming of the Shrew and Richard III. In these plays, the art of dissembling plays a pivotal part in the characters of each play; albeit, their execution varies from each other. Foremost, in Taming of the Shrew, whilst most of the characters are arguably considered as dissemblers, the most prominent one is Petruccio. As a dissembler, Petruccio uses language as a means to conceal his purpose and achieve his means – marrying a rich woman (and in this case, Kate) and eventually ‘taming’ her. He demonstrates his skill of dissembling when he expresses his desire of marrying Kate. Another example of a mastermind dissembler is Richard Gloucester in Richard III. In the play, Richard, similar to Petruccio, uses language to hide his true nature and achieve his goal of becoming the next king; his dissembling nature is evident in his. From these two dissemblers of Shakespeare’s plays, they demonstrate on how language is used as their tool of dissemblers and how powerful a tool it is in achieving one’s means.

Based on the above examples, it is clear that Othello and The Taming of the Shrew, two plays written by Shakespeare, contained domestic violence. Therefore, high school students are reading and learning about domestic violence when studying Shakespeare. A current problem that occurs among high school students is teen dating violence. Teen dating violence was defined as the physical, sexual, psychological, emotional violence, and stalking that happens in a dating relationship (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016). It can be argued that reading about domestic violence in Shakespeare’s play could result in high school students using or experiencing teen dating violence. Albert Bandura’s Social Learning

Love and friendship, sadness and pain, birth and death- all are proven to be constants throughout history. Even as centuries go by and cultures evolve or diminish, there will be concepts that never die out; ideas that are everlasting in time. One, who proved this, is William Shakespeare. His pieces were first created in the late 1500s; nonetheless, his writing is still relevant even today, almost 5 centuries later. In Greenway’s school play, the setting was moved to the 1970s, yet the play’s aroma withstood the changes. Therefore, changing the context of one of his plays, such as The Taming of the Shrew, minimally effects the appeals which can be seen through the consistency of the audience, his unfading persona, and universal message.

In Shakespeare's comedy, The Taming of the Shrew, Shakespeare has a woman as one of the story's main characters. Katherine Minola (Kate) is off the wall, and kinda crazy. Because of her actions, the “male centered world” around her doesn't know what to do with her.