The Taming Of The Shrew Research Paper

“When love speaks the voice of all the gods makes heaven drowsy with the harmony,” Taming of the Shrew, Act IV, scene II.

At several moments in the narration, the audience is presented with an externally obedient wife, but again, the utilization of first person reveals that the woman’s thought’s contradict with her actions somewhat. When admitting her unease with the estate, it is mentioned that John, her husband, mocks these fears by laughing. Soon after, the narrator redeems John by stating that that type of behavior and interactions between a two in marriage is common, and not hindering to anything. It is important to remember that the work is written in the 1800s, so this behavior was socially acceptable. However, in modern context, the belittling that occurs in the story is not redeemable; women are seen as equals and are treated accordingly.

In Shakespeare's comedy, The Taming of the Shrew, Shakespeare has a woman as one of the story's main characters. Katherine Minola (Kate) is off the wall, and kinda crazy. Because of her actions, the “male centered world” around her doesn't know what to do with her.

Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare, the indication of a woman being the possession of her husband, and having to do everything that he proposes her to do is presented. Katherine has to acquire appropriate manners toward a man in advance before her sister Bianca can wed. Bianca wishes to marry one of her suitors/bachelors, but she can’t due to tradition because the older sister has to marry first.

William Shakespeare's Taming of the shrew is a very confusing book to read, especially since there are so many ways to read and interpret it. The book is perceived as a comedy but a very simple change in tone to some of the characters lines could make the play a drama or a tragedy. In “The Taming of the Shrew” a lot of things are assumed about the book that aren't for sure, such as, how the characters act, how they talk, their mannerisms, and how Kate is the shrew. We don't really know the answers to all the questions for sure. So who really is the shrew? Is it really Kate or is it someone else?

The Taming of the Shrew by Shakespeare is about a mean screw name Katherine who becomes tamed by the end of the novel. Katherine fought her husband until the very end. One might say that she became tamed because she had no choice. Another theory could be that Kathrine tamed herself but one thing is certain that without the primary character changing in some way by the experience of the story, the story has less meaning. Katherine sees herself in Petruchio's behavior and they both become tamed in relation to how they were acting prior to marriage.

The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare might appeal to Kalidasa because this play can be used to show the Hindu puranas and respect toward the deities. Kalidasa’s name means the “servant of Kali” which can suggest he is a follower of the deity Durga, who evolves in the form of Kali to destroy the demons. In the Taming of the Shrew, Katherine can represent the deity Durga/ Kali to reveal the two side of a female character. According to Hinduism, goddess Durga is the main force behind creation, preservation and destruction; similarly, a female like Katherine can very destructive by punishing her sister and being rude to her father. However, that same women, Katherine, can create a beautiful family bond and preserve the relationship with the force of love and affection. Furthermore, this play can be used to teach lessons toward the Indian society to treat women with respect and not consider them to be part of secondary status because of gender division or sexism. It can reveal to

A recurring theme throughout Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew is the impact of man's societal pressure and how society portrays them is clearly evident. The idea of breaking a woman’s spirit and making her subservient to her husband is primarily harped on throughout the story. We see an example of this by how Petruccio responds to his newly wed wife Kate. Petruccio uses humiliation, starvation, and sleep deprivation at his country house to transform Kates fiery and hardheaded personality to his ideal wife.

Battle of the Sexes would have been another appropriate title for this play because the entire play is women verses men, men verses women. This battle of the sexes shows no boundaries between the rich and poor, young or old, man or women. The basis of all the rivalry stems from the fact that the men in this play look at the women as if they were objects, instead of human beings with feelings. This theory that women are merely objects creates an environment that the women have to adapt to and survive in and the environment of a person will depict what he or she will become, resulting in a battle between the sexes.

Have you ever heard of two stories in different time periods with characters following the same actions? This occurs in two different plays. Taming of the Shrew is a play written by William Shakespeare. In this play a high-class noble man, Petruchio, finds a woman, Katherine, he would like the marry but, makes the decision to tame her as well. Pygmalion is a play written by Bernard Shaw.

Katherine makes this important speech after Petruchio tries to make her obey by ordering her to say that the sun is really the moon. Katherine is tired, hungry, and worn out of their conflicts. She is basically saying that at this point forward in her life, Petruchio might as well redefine her reality for her. With Katherine caving in with this speech, Petruchio's victory over her is imminent. She does not have the strength to resist his authority fully, and her taming is all but fully complete.

A dissembler is described by OED as someone who “dissembles; one who conceals his real purposes under a false appearance; one who practises duplicity; a deceiver; a hypocrite.” As such, the art of dissembling is a prominent concept in many of Shakespeare’s plays, particularly in Taming of the Shrew and Richard III. In these plays, the art of dissembling plays a pivotal part in the characters of each play; albeit, their execution varies from each other. Foremost, in Taming of the Shrew, whilst most of the characters are arguably considered as dissemblers, the most prominent one is Petruccio. As a dissembler, Petruccio uses language as a means to conceal his purpose and achieve his means – marrying a rich woman (and in this case, Kate) and eventually ‘taming’ her. He demonstrates his skill of dissembling when he expresses his desire of marrying Kate. Another example of a mastermind dissembler is Richard Gloucester in Richard III. In the play, Richard, similar to Petruccio, uses language to hide his true nature and achieve his goal of becoming the next king; his dissembling nature is evident in his. From these two dissemblers of Shakespeare’s plays, they demonstrate on how language is used as their tool of dissemblers and how powerful a tool it is in achieving one’s means.

Based on the above examples, it is clear that Othello and The Taming of the Shrew, two plays written by Shakespeare, contained domestic violence. Therefore, high school students are reading and learning about domestic violence when studying Shakespeare. A current problem that occurs among high school students is teen dating violence. Teen dating violence was defined as the physical, sexual, psychological, emotional violence, and stalking that happens in a dating relationship (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016). It can be argued that reading about domestic violence in Shakespeare’s play could result in high school students using or experiencing teen dating violence. Albert Bandura’s Social Learning

For the group performance of “The taming of the Shrew” by William Shakespeare that my group, made up of Echo Mendiguren-Dalton, Shannon McGarry, Elias Skora, and Katie Calder, did, we chose Act 2 Scene 1. For props we used a walking stick, a bright green tutu, a purple fedora, a paper mustache, four old red books, a rubber duck, a cardboard guitar, a background done with whiteboard markers, a wooden dagger, and a scarf. I was responsible for the walking stick, the tutu, the fedora, the rubber duck, and the cardboard used to make the guitar. I bought the tutu, and got the cardboard from work, but the rest of the items I was already in possession of. We met outside of class twice to practice the scenes and to organize ourselves to the actions we would be performing, and to also create the guitar and mustache.

Love and friendship, sadness and pain, birth and death- all are proven to be constants throughout history. Even as centuries go by and cultures evolve or diminish, there will be concepts that never die out; ideas that are everlasting in time. One, who proved this, is William Shakespeare. His pieces were first created in the late 1500s; nonetheless, his writing is still relevant even today, almost 5 centuries later. In Greenway’s school play, the setting was moved to the 1970s, yet the play’s aroma withstood the changes. Therefore, changing the context of one of his plays, such as The Taming of the Shrew, minimally effects the appeals which can be seen through the consistency of the audience, his unfading persona, and universal message.