For this week’s lecture we had five different readings. There were two chapters, chapter five and twelve, from “The Selfish Gene” by Richard Dawkins. The other readings were chapters five, six, and seven From “Yanomamo” by Napoleon A. Chagnon. In chapter five from “The Selfish Gene”, Dawkins discusses the idea that animals of the same species are more likely to be aggressive towards each other because they share more of the same resources. This makes a lot of sense because two animals that do not use the same resource will have no reason to fight because the others existence does not really affect their own. One could even compare this idea to reproduction and mating. Although this relates more back to biological sex and sexual preference rather …show more content…
This is understandable when one thinks of comparative advantage. If each individual does what they are comparatively best at and then shares their benefits with the group in return for getting the product of someone else’s comparative advantage, then the entire group benefits as whole. In this situation everyone gets the benefits of everyone’s efforts rather than each having to produce a little bit of everything which would take more time and effort. In chapter five of “Yanomamo”, the author discusses why two tribes may be more willing to create good relationships with others. This is a form of cooperation where alliances are made and more people benefit. Alliances open the doors for many things such as trade and marriage between tribes. These benefit them again for comparative advantage and in order to find mates that are not related. Chapter six, then discusses the next benefit of these alliances. If they are not at war with each other, then they are both benefitting from not losing members of their tribes or having to use immense amounts of resources. One can even see this between countries such as Russia and the
Typically people seek medical attention because they know they are able to trust the provider handling their care. If this trust between the doctor and the patient is broken, the patient will more than likely search elsewhere for the help he needs. This issue of trust and informed consent is shown in many instances in the novel, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot. Informed consent is shown throughout the novel; however, it is strongly portrayed with the relationship between doctor and patient.
Cells continue to be the most basic units of life. They can grow, develop, and they reproduce. Working with cells can help scientists get a better understanding of how they can help society. Since these cells come from organisms that were living or were once living, scientists should have access to the cells that they need to do research. In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot, some scientists stole cells from Henrietta Lacks, a black female woman, without her or her family's permission.
Many people struggle financially when it comes to health care and affording healthcare. Sometimes we tend to avoid going to the doctors because of how expensive it is. If you weren’t able to afford healthcare and your mother was the cause of the advancement of medicine how would you feel. Throughout the advancement of medicine and science no one has ever seen cells similarly to the HeLa cells. HeLa cells has given the world cures to Parkinson’s disease, influenza, leukemia, hemophilia and polio. Many people have benefited from the HeLa cells but her family. In “ The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot there are many questions about Henrietta Lacks family and if they should be compensated for the cells that were taken from their mother without her consent. Although Henrietta cells have helped the world find many cures, The Lacks family should be compensated for their mother’s cells by the researches and faculties that have taken some of the HeLa cells from John Hopkins. Instead of being compensated from John Hopkins they should get compensated from the research facilities that used her cells, because John Hopkins did not benefit financially from the cell. Ethically they should receive some sort of compensation because for years the lacks struggled financially affording healthcare.
In The Sunflower book by Simon wiesenthal there is a passage that includes a delama; Karl ( a dying nazi soldier) was asking for forgiveness for his actions from Simon (a jew). When forgiveness is asked, the person giving the forgiveness has to at times think about their religion and think about who has the ability to forgive him/her. In the book karl admitted to seeing the family that he shot at jump out the window then Then from the other windows fell burning bodies…We shot…" Religion has a big impact on if he/she should forgive the wrongdoer. Since many jews don't believe in the next life and forgiveness is not a requirement and if i was in simon's situation i wouldn't forgive him either.
Ever hear of the saying opposites attract? Well in the novel 1984 it seems like opposites really do attract. Winston and Julia have almost nothing in common except for their hatred for the Party. There are many differences between Julia and Winston such as their view of the Party, the way they resist and rebel, and their characteristics.
“Anthem” by Ayn Rand, is a story about the meaning behind self development of a person’s own thoughts. Ayn Rand was born February 2, 1905 in Saint petersburg, Russia. She is a novelist,philosopher, and screenwriter.
This paper is an integrated critique of Richard Dawkins’, The Selfish Gene, and Jonathan Kozol’s, Savage Inequalities. The premise of my critique is to compare how these two books by two different authors on two different subjects can relate. I believe this is done by exampling how Dawkins describes the general make up of individuals and how they interact in their specific groups that they as a species have come up in over millennia and how Kozol describes that where you are born and raised has predetermined the path that you will be forced down in a cultural and more specifically educational since for the rest of your life. The bottom line is a place for everyone and every one in their place.
For example the whites and natives came together to grow crops even though they didn’t like it they worked it out. The most positive interactions that the native had was the French it was because. They did fair trading fur with the natives and they were very humble to
No worries, and thank you so much for helping me. I think a conversation at school on the book would be wonderful for all concerned. The boys and I started reading "The Sunflower" by Simon Wiesenthal last night - it is one of the novels I use for my basic skills classes that leads my students into their first argumentative essay, and the only book I had three copies. Both the boys were really engaged. Khai started to ask questions similar to my students, and even took the reins to explain a part of the story to Hayden. We read ten pages last night, each taking turns reading aloud- they boys seem to struggle, but I believe it will help them in the long run. . Again, thank you for your help.
“Let us try to teach generosity and altruism, because we are born selfish.” [Page 3] It is shown that Dawkins believes that the selfishness of our genes make them able to reproduce copies of themselves; this is the starting point of
The non-fiction book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, written by Rebecca Skloot, details the happenings and life of Henrietta Lacks, an African American woman and tobacco farmer who became a medical miracle in the 1950’s. The book is written in an attempt to chronicle both the experiences and tribulations of Henrietta Lacks and her family, as well as the events that led to, and resulted from, research done on Henrietta Lacks’ cells. Henrietta was a very average African American woman in this period; she had only a seventh-grade level education, and followed traditional racial and gender roles by spending her time has a mother and caretaker, as well as working on farms throughout her life until the involvement of the US in World War II brought her and her husband, “Day” Lacks, comparatively better work opportunities in industrial steel mills. However, after her death in 1951 Henrietta became much more than average to doctors at John Hopkins when the discovered that cells extracted from her cancerous tissue continued to live and grow much longer than any other tissue samples. Further investigation and isolation of these thriving cells led to the creation of the first ever immortal human cell line in medical history. The incredible progress in medicine made possible by Henrietta Lack’s tissue cells were not without downfalls, though. The treatments and experiences received by Henrietta and the effects it had on her and her family demonstrate both racial and gender
This is arguably the best chapter title of the book, and it refers to the concept of reciprocal altruism. In all previous chapters, Dawkins discusses tparental and sexual relationships and aggressive interactions between same-species individuals. There are however, there are more kinds of altruistic relationships outside of these categories. Dawkins describes two theories on reciprocal altruism: the cave theory (pronouned kay-vee, Latin for “beware”) and the never break ranks theory. In the cave theory, a member of a flock that sees a predator before others in the flock notice, will warn the others through some kind of signal. The never break ranks theory suits species of birds that flee all together when a predator approaches. One individual
In the novel, The Rebel Albert Camus argues that in the heart of rebellion there can be no justified reason for murder. Camus has stated that rebellion is born from a simple belief, “We are, so I am.” The rebel does not act on a desire for conflict; a rebel acts on a desire for justice for everyone—therefore, as long as one is imprisoned, all are prisoners. With this base belief, murder stands against everything the rebel hopes to accomplish. Camus supports this theory stating, “[R]ebellion, when it develops into destruction, is illogical.
Presented first by Charles Darwin nearly 150 years ago, the theory of evolution has answered many questions to the unique aspects of different species. It explains both the similarities and the differences among the animal species, and that all species are to varying degrees similar to one another, as well as being unique due to natural selection. Evolution is not a moral force, instead it promotes different traits that tend to get one’s genes passed on to the next generation (Gray, 2002). One of the different traits which evolution has influenced is behavior: for example the trait of aggression.
With his provoking work entitled The Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins attempts to answer such questions as he proposes a shift in the evolutionary paradigm. Working through the metaphor of a "selfish gene", Dawkins constructs an evolutionary model using a gene as the fundamental unit of selection, opposed to the more commonly accepted belief of the species as the unit of selection.