The Pros and Cons of Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay

Fells (2016, p. 211) wrote “ just as a doctor works to bring a person back to health, so too a mediator works to bring a deadlocked negotiation back to a situation where the parties can reach agreement”. This essay discusses this statement with reference to contemporary research on dispute resolution. In order to comprehend how this is achieved, we must consider the essence of mediation, the different types of mediation and what mediators do. Negotiation and mediation are process used to resolve opposing preferences between parties. Negotiation is defined in Fells (2016, p. 3) as “a process by which two parties with differences that they need to resolve try to reach agreement through

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an increasingly popular option that allows people to resolve disputes outside of court in a cooperative manner. ADR can be faster, cheaper and less stressful than going to court. [Most importantly, the use of ADR can provide greater satisfaction with the way disputes are resolved. ADR has been gradually evolving within the Fresno Superior Court for the past several years. In 1999 the Court recognized a need for greater public access to dispute resolution for cases and established an ADR Department. This

Alternative dispute resolution is a highly effective instrument in resolving conflict and attaining justice for individuals in relation to resource efficiency and timeliness through utilising mediation, conciliation and arbitration. Mediation is an exceptionally efficacious informal process of dispute resolution, usually confidential and conducted with the assistance of an

ADR’s are generally confidential, flexible and usually cheaper than going to court. ADR’s are able to offer savings for the justice system as cases resolved through ADR save time, money and resources of the courts. They are also much less formal than a court processes and are confidential, unlike a court, which is usually open to the public. They can also be flexible and can be modified to suits the needs of the parties. However, Other than arbitration, the decision is not binding.

As litigation continues to be a time-wasting, costly, distracted, and unsatisfactory practice for dispute resolution, alternative dispute resolution increases in popularity, specifically, mediation and arbitration. Arbitration is a cost efficient substitute to litigation that is the yielding of a dispute to an impartial party in order to receive a final incumbent decision in the form of an award. Arbitration is sensitive, classified, and modeled to be a swift, and inexpensive solution to dispute. Participating parties may include additional terms in the agreement identifying arrangements to their agreements’ arbitration clauses to meet the requirements of their discrete dispute. In summation, arbitration is process that is private, speedy, cost efficient, and customized to the liking of the parties involved.

Throughout the years there has been many definitions of mediation. Nevertheless one the most acceptable definition of mediation refers to this procedure as a “…process in which the participants, with the support of a mediator, identify issues, develop options, consider alternatives and make decisions about future actions…” . They also described mediators as the third party assisting the participants in reaching their decision. This process should form a part of the pre-trial civil litigation process as its advantages on the legal system and the community outweigh its disadvantages. The distinguishing models of mediation make it a suitable approach for all or most civil cases.

The use of ADR also involves the active participation of the litigants in the search for solution to their conflict. This gives the process an advantage of generating a solution that is fair to both parties and which can at the same time restore or create a good relation among the conflicting parties (USaid, 1998).

In this report I will be reflecting on the group’s oral presentation a on a topic in Business law, “What is ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) and How Does in Improve Access to Justice”. First I will give a brief outline of ADR, the I will look at the effort we made by the group towards the oral presentation including the group’s strengths and weaknesses. I will look at the strengths and weaknesses of the presentation. I will also write about what learnt from this exercise and lastly I will have a brief conclusion

ADR is used to settle arguments outside of the courtroom. ADR typically includes early neutral evaluation, negotiation, conciliation, mediation, and arbitration. Court systems are getting busier and busier, and court dockets are bloated with frivolous, time-wasting, cases that can be arbitrated outside of the court. Courts are known for not being very efficient and usually come with copious amounts of delays. Rising costs of litigation continue to be a detriment to litigants. So with these shortcomings becoming common knowledge within some states, more states have begun experimenting with ADR programs. Some of these programs are voluntary; others are mandatory (n.a., 2015). Within ADR, the two most common methods are arbitration and mediation while negotiation is almost always attempted first to resolve a

Both forms of ADR can be advantageous, given that they are less costly and also can keep the anger involved to a minimum. A compromise can be reached that is mutually advantageous to both sides, and 'alternative' solutions can be found that will not necessarily be allowed in a more formal jury system. Mediation and arbitration can also be embarked upon more quickly than a lawsuit, which enables the parties involved to engage in dialogue before conflicts get out of hand. And in some disputes, such as divorce, there are often many grey areas, with no clear, single person who is in the wrong or right.

Mediation is the quickest developing conflict resolution technique. It speaks to another option to the ‘win-lose’ adjudicative procedures. Mediation likewise offers a specific

ADR is useful in resolving virtually all genres of disputes by providing speedier, enforceable decisions through Arbitration, Mediation, Early Neutral Evaluation and other hybrid mechanisms. The presence of cost-effective and predictable ADR mechanisms capable of resolving complex disputes help to bolster the confidence of litigants within the country and therefore stimulates trade and investment both internationally and locally.

     Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR refers to a number of various processes that can be used to resolve legal disputes other than by litigation. Recently, methods of dispute resolution which focus on arbitration, mediation and negotiation as an alternative to adjudication have gained notoriety. This notoriety may have been caused by the public perception that ADR methods are less expensive, more efficient, and more satisfactory than the normal traditional course of litigation. The goals of establishing these processes to resolve disputes as an alternative to more formal legal processes include: 1) to make the regular court system more efficient, less costly and more responsive to the needs of the litigants;

Originally, in ancient India, Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR, as we know today, was the way disputes were generally settled. The whole village by way of Gram Panchayat used to solve the problems of the villagers by sitting together and mediating the problems faced by the two parties. Since the advent of the modern legal system, this method of dispute settlement has largely been set aside.

Alternative dispute resolution is a procedure settling disputes without litigation by the assistant from the 3rd party. This resolution include negotiation, arbitration, mediation and ombudsmen .The ADR are increasingly being utilized in disputes that would otherwise result in litigation, including high profile labour disputes, divorce actions, and personal injury claims.