SMILE! Your on Camera
If body cameras were put on police officers in your area, would you support it, or would you go against it? Body cameras are basically small video cameras, worn on a human being’s body, and it is typically used by police officers when they need to record arrests, crimes, etc. Body cameras were actually introduced in the UK in 2005, and after the U.S saw what they were doing, they wanted to use their idea and put body cameras on police officers to hopefully reduce police brutality and so on. Many people like this idea, but a lot of people think that this idea is not the best idea they could have come up with. For example, people like and support body cameras because it provides more safety. Others don't like and don't
…show more content…
David Garrick, an author of the article, Police Using Less Force After Donning Cameras, states, “...but high-level use of force -- such as physical take-downs or employing Tasers, chemical agents or weapons -- was down 16.4%. Low-level use of force, such as physical strength, controlled holds and Taser warnings, was up 25.3%.”(Garrick, David. "Police using Less Force After Donning Cameras." Los Angeles Times, 11 Feb 2017, pp. B.2, SIRS Issues Researcher, https://sks.sirs.com). From what we see, body cameras helped tremendously, by reducing the highest level of force. Moreover, the lowest level of force increased, so fewer tasers were used, etc. On the same article, he told us, “Marvel said he was particularly pleased to see the reduction in the use of high-level force, which he said means fewer instances of injuries to officers and the people they are trying to take into custody.” David basically is saying that Marvel said he was quite impressed and happy to see the reduction of high level force. Moreover, he also says that because of this, he doesn't need to worry about officers getting hurt, as well as facing the people that
At first glance, it might be compelling to correlate the cutback in use-of-force incidents and complaints adjacent to the police with the introduction of body cameras. Body-worn camera video provides quantitative data on rates and types of confrontation that may explain imbalances in use of force between individual officers. During these studies, the experimental period was approximately one year, which was held during 2012-2013. Table 3: use of force, citizens’ complaints, and police public raw figures exhibit group assignment experimental shifts or control shifts was the independent variable, while the number of use of force incidents and the number of citizens’ complaints was used as the dependent variable. The table provides information
Alcohol, it has been around for ten thousand years. Some great things have come from it, but in some situations it has ruined people’s lives. Some may ask how something can have such opposite endings. Well the answer is that people don’t know moderation while consuming alcohol. Alcohol can easily be misinterpreted as an un-harmful substance. In this essay I will educate readers that in moderation and in church traditions it is not harmful or being abused. I will be discussing the importance of where the selfishness and rule breaking comes from when one is intoxicated while driving. I say selfish because that is what it is, a human being lacking consideration for
Not having body cameras in the line of duty is becoming an issue, legally and ethically, for both officers and citizens. Body cameras show the objective perspective of police in the field, and show everything that occurred, whether it reflects positively or negatively on the officer. There is not much evidence yet on the effect body cameras have. However, one study that was done shows positive feedback from the use of body cameras. In Rialto, California, a study was conducted and showed that use of force by police officers and complaints by citizens were dramatically decreased after they began to use
There are stats that show police misconduct is reduced when the officers are wearing body mounted cameras. On CATO Institute 's webpage of National Police Misconduct Reporting Project, they show stats of an experiment that was conducted in Rialto, California over a year long period. Over this year, officers were randomly assigned to wear these body cameras. The stats that were taken show that the number of times these officers used unneeded force dropped by a considerable amount compared to previous years when these officers were not wearing these cameras. Since these stats show that police misconduct dropped when officers were wearing the body mounted cameras, it shows that police officers behaved better
Q6. India is a large and prosperous nation in Asia, they are also a nation of which who has the largest and most influential democracy. India prospers and thrives when it comes to their political and economic stances. Previously, we had learned the India was the jewel in the crown for the country of England. England had obtained control over India for a long period of time making India one of their best and most profitable colonies. Therefore, their political and economic success would be very crucial when it comes to the future of democracy in Asia. During this time in the world, democracy and communism were battling, trying to prove which one was better. The Soviet Union along with the East argued that communism was the way to go; on the
Body cameras will prevent officers from using to much unneeded force. In the "SIRS DATABASE--At Issue: Police and Body Cameras" it states that. "In the past several years, wearable video cameras for police officers have also been issued as standard
When police officers wear body cameras, less complaints are filed, use-of-force situations decrease, and training opportunities are gained. In 2012
This also applies to police officers who may use illegal use of force. Source two 'SIRS DATABASE—At Issue: Police and Body Cameras' states that, "Those in favor of having all police wear body cameras claim that their use will reduce the use of force by police officers...". Using body cameras to lessen the amount of excessive force used by police officers is a mental process. This is because body cameras do no physically toy with police officers to stop them from using illegal use of force, but rather it will make them stop and think before doing so because they know they will be caught red
Body cameras in policing are still new, but more and more agencies are beginning to implement this technology into their line of work. At first police officers were very hesitant to wear these body cameras because they were afraid they would infringe themselves and give away their own privacy. Later, as body cameras were beginning to see more use in the work place, officers began to realize that these very own body cameras that they once thought would only cause themselves harm would actual prove to be useful in a variety of situations. Some of these situations can be citizen complaints, to even backing up an officers use of force. Body cameras can be the one sole thing that can give
In today’s world, body cameras are being worn by more than half of the police officers in the United States. Many people will say that body cameras are invading their privacy and they will cause bigger issues, but others will say that the body cameras are an improvement and will help everyone out in the long run by resolving the issues. Body cameras will prevent incidents of police brutality and improve law enforcement. They should be worn for the police officer’s safety as well as the citizens who are interacting with the police, so that way the footage will show what really happened in a situation.
Body cameras are proven to make policemen act better while they’re are on duty. “Police officers "tend to behave a little better"(Kon, Body Cameras for Police Officers). if they know their behavior is being recorded on camera” stated author Tsin Yen Kon. Police will act better cause they know they are being “watched”. Just like when a student has a parent to sit in their class, they act very well, police do the same. Police will also act right, because they don’t want to lose their jobs or get fired because some careless mistake that they made while on camera. “When police officers are acutely aware that their behavior is being monitored (because they turn on the cameras), and when officers tell citizens that the cameras are recording their behavior, everyone behaves better” (Knickerbocker). Brad Knickerbocker, the author, explains how both sides of the camera, police, and criminal will have an effect on their behavior because they know that they are being watched, and recorded. When people know they are being watched, it is like they get scared, because they don't want anything to be used against them. Although cameras will make police act better, people will still think that police brutality will still happen.
America is not universally free. This is easily proven with examples from a variety of subjects. For example, take LGBT rights. De jure, gay marriage is legal nationwide. But de facto, when one looks at the social reality dealt with by people who are not heterosexual, one finds that not everyone has the realistic ability to do so. Even on a de jure level, there are the “bathroom bills,” passed by North Carolina and looked at by many states, designed to limit transgender people’s ability to use the bathroom.
complaints have been conducted. In a study conducted by the University of Cambridge with help from the Denver, Colorado police department, complaints have dropped by 47% (Zercoe n.p). According to Zercoe, 105 Denver officers were equipped with body cameras from June 1, 2014 to December 21, 2014 (n.p). The study in Rialto, California found that complaints dropped from 24 in 2012, to three in 2013. New Carrolton police chief stated, “We had one person make a claim and we explained to them that we would check the video on the officer’s interaction. When they heard we had video, they changed their mind and they didn't want to complain" (n.p). Civilian behavior has improved with the use of body cameras. In fact, there are less complaints and civil conversations between an officer and civilian because of the small devices.
This experiment was conducted to see if the body cameras would improve relationships with the public. “BWCs were allocated to all frontline officers in one for a period of six months (July 23, 2014–December 15, 2014), but not to any other frontline officers of the other five geographic districts ( officers=513). The single geographic district was therefore the treatment area, while each of the five other districts served as comparison sites”(). Arrests, complaints, 911 calls and the use of force were monitored through the cameras to improve the results of the BWC experiments. So far, the results of the experiments turned out to be neutral; the BWC experiment did not see a significant increase or decrease of calls or arrests, but complaints
a) In a 2012 study, it was found that officers that were required to wear cameras while on the job were more cautious and their use of excessive force fell by 60 percent, while public complaints dropped by 88 percent. (Rory Carroll, 2013)