The Passionate Shepherd and The Nymph’s Reply are two very intriguing poems with two different viewpoints on Love, Nature, Time, and the Materialistic world. In this comparative essay you will understand how two people love each other unconditionally, but have divergent views on how to love one another. The Shepherd is in love with the nymph and he believes that if he gives her everything that she ambitiously desires then she’ll come and dwell with him. To me the Shepherd’s love is more based around items and materials in general, his love was more materialistic and idealistic that actually putting love into it. Yes, he meant well and all but you have to think no woman is going to stay around long if the only thing that the man does is get her stuff all the time. Now, the Nymph she loves the Shepherd and wants to go live with him, but she wants him to actually think that instead of flowers and skirts she wants love and affection. She wants someone that’s going to love her and not hurt her. She wants to feel like what she’s getting herself into is going to last, instead of giving her another heartbreak. But the love is there for both of them, they are both just trying to find some way for the other one to understand.
The nature (tone) of both poems is having, dissimilar viewpoints also. The Shepherd’s tone was more warm and happy thoughts. He was excited and he focused on his future with the Nymph, he had a melodious tone, almost like a lullaby. The Nymph’s nature was death related, she was more worried about what if things didn’t work out where was that going to leave her and she was more focused on the past, like she felt that the Shepherd was going to be like another man that she has dealt with. She viewed nature in a cold winter like view, she feels like everything will inevitably leave. Their natures were like seasons; the Shepherds nature was like summer and spring where everything is happy and alive, and the nymph’s nature was like winter where everything is cold and dead.
Their view of time pretty much ties in with the way that they had viewed nature, the Shepherd believed that their love will grow overtime, he thinks that love is a forever thing. He is in a trance of a world where everything is all
In the poems “Pamphillia to Amphilanthus” and “I… and Your Eyes,” there are similarities and differences. The poems are both about love. The poems have different perspectives on how they view love. The poems have the same subject, but in contrast have differences of how the subject is viewed. The poems’ styles and theme also have differences and similarities. Love is perceived differently in each poem.
They both are amazed at the numbers of the flock that they observed, stating “in greater numbers than I thought I had ever seen them before” (Passage 1) and then rephrased in “The flight extended like a fluttering banner, an unfurled oriflamme, in either direction as far as I could see.” (Passage 2). The difference between the two writing styles is one uses a direct and straightforward use of tone through phrases like “In the autumn of 1813...from north-east to south-west...I dismounted, seated myself on an eminence” (Passage 1). These phrases show no emotion but simply describe the action or the setting. The other style is the reciprocal of this direct approach, having a childlike curiosity and questioning its surroundings in phrases like “unexpectedness of this beauty...Could tiny birds be sifting through me right now, birds winging through the gaps between my cells, touching nothing, but quickening in my tissues, fleet?” (Passage
Differences exist between the two poems throughout, we see ‘Passionate Shepherd’ is a lyrical poem when ‘To His Coy Mistress’ is a carpe diem poem consisting of three steps of argument.
Debora B. Schwartz in her article, "Pastoral Poetry and Pastoral Comedy" highlights the fact that the major themes which are typically discussed in pastoral poetry include: "love and seduction;… the corruption of the city or court vs. the ‘purity’ of idealized country life…" (par. 2). In the poem, "The Passionate Shepherd to His Love," the theme of the "'purity' of idealized country life" is explored when the male persona attempts to use words which conjure up images of an paradise which he and his love interest can escape to sexually gratify each other. The male persona entices his love interest to "come live" with him and be his love (l. 1). He desires that he and his lover's "prove" the various "pleasures" that "woods or steepy mountain yields" (ll. 2, 4). This argument is rebuffed by the female persona in the poem, "The Nymph's Reply to Her Husband," when she states the following: "Time drives the flocks from field to fold, /When rivers rage and rocks grow cold" (ll. 5-6). It should be noted that these lines reflect the following lines of Marlowe's poem: "And we will sit upon the rocks, / seeing the shepherds feed their flocks/ by shallow rivers…" (ll. 5-7). The female persona undermines the shepherd's idealization of the countryside and pastoral life since the passage of time, depicted by the seasons, will change the characteristics of these things described so positively by the male persona in Marlowe's poem.
Love makes people become selfish, but it is also makes the world greater. In this poem, the world that the speaker lives and loves is not limited in “my North, my South, my East and West / my working week and my Sunday rest” (9-10), it spreads to “My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song (11). The poem’s imagery dominates most of the third stanza giving readers an image of a peaceful world in which everything is in order. However, the last sentence of the stanza is the decisive element. This element not only destroys the inner world of the speaker, but it also sends out the message that love or life is mortal.
Several poems in the anthology explore the intensity of human emotion. Explore this theme, referring to these three poems in detail and by referencing at least three other poems from your wider reading.’
Just what is theology? This question can have a wide variety of answers, from irrelevant facts about God thought up by men centuries ago, to complicated theories discussed by scholars. Typically, the average 21st century man does not consider theology as relevant. Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth. Theology by definition has the characteristics of both expounding the truth, and impacting the believer with that truth (Himes, 2011). Therefore, theology and the church are intricately combined, in that the church embodies the revelation of God, and is reality, not theory (Himes, 2011). A personal practical theology must begin with revelation, not the individual (Himes, 2011), and proclaim
Once during a passionate sermon at church, my pastor had made a vivid statement about incorporation of sin in law. Pastor Smith stated, “the world has developed loopholes to maintain its dignity by incorporating sin into the law, and as long as we are operating under the law, our actions are perceived as being justified”(Smith). Reflecting on his theory has brought me to the realization that the United Stated has established a profitable industry, governed by the creation and the manipulation of laws. Although, it’s ideal to believe that the standards of laws were truly orchestrated with the foundation of equality, justice, and freedom. It is imperative to be informed of historical events that has transpired through the history of the black race each operating under the ordinance of law. Beginning with the development of slavery, to the alarming rate of black men behind bars. I am compelled to present the clause of injustice that has labeled the United States as the home of 25% of the world 's prisoners ().
Ralegh conveys this somber realization through his plain style of verse. Though he describes the mistress in detail, she is not the subject of his poem. Ralegh uses Love’s mistress and her destruction as a vehicle to address the destructive nature of Time. He approaches that subject in the plain style, using short, proverbial phrases intended to make the reader aware of time and mutability. The poem contains several lines that are made entirely of one-syllable words, which draw out the time it takes to read the line. Contrast lines 31-32 in “Nature, that washed her hands in milk” with lines 8 and 10 in Christopher Marlowe’s “The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” (p. 989). Marlowe describes the land in which he lives, where “Melodious birds sing madrigals,” and beds are made of “a thousand fragrant posies”. Marlowe’s verse sounds quick and light when spoken, simply because he uses fewer words in an eight-syllable line. Ralegh, in contrast, often uses seven or eight words to fill the same eight-syllable line: “Oh, cruel Time! which takes in trust/Our youth, our joys, and all we have…” Line 32 especially requires that the reader take more time to pronounce each syllable, which adds weight to each word.
Have you ever wondered how the shepherds felt the night Jesus was born. I was one of those shepherds. So if you want to know how I felt that night, you can now find out. It was the most exciting night of my life. Usually my life is boring, but then an angel appeared, it told us to go find him and worship the Savior, so we did.
Being a constant and unalterable force of nature, time is constant subject of renaissance poetry. While some poems have time as the main subject of their conceits, other poems such as William Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 138” and Sir Walter Raleigh “The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd” have conceits that focus on other themes, but still portray time. “Sonnet 138” is a man pondering the changes of his relationship with his lover. “The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd” is a reply to a lover’s request for her to live with him and be his love. Both poems exhibits a lover whose youth, trust, and love have
“The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” by Christopher Marlowe and “The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd” by Sir Walter Raleigh are two of numerous, prominent poems in the late sixteenth century. Both were written between 1590 and 1600, however, the exact years for each are somewhat ambiguous. Raleigh’s “The Passionate Shepherd . . . ” is classified as a pastoral poem due to its depiction of a natural setting and is also considered to be perhaps the most famous of all English pastoral works. Likewise, it is a carpe diem poem given its advocation to “seize the day” and to “live life to the fullest extent”—which often implied care-free, sexual behaviors. Conversely, there exists many sequels to it, the most relevant being Marlowe’s “The Nymph’s Reply . . . “ Marlowe’s speaker claims that the recipient should live with him so that they may pursue a variety of romantic activities. However, Raleigh’s speaker is significantly less optimistic and states that nothing is eternal, all shall succumb to aging, and that they would only live with him if life had no boundaries of time.
The passionate shepherd to His love poem is a poem that portrays the basic romanticizing of the country living which describes the nature of the environments and is very sentimental. Christopher’s poem is showing the best fantasy of ordinary romance that would be much better felt in the countryside other than the urban side of the country. Nature is of the essence. The nymph's reply to the shepherd Poem, on the other hand, is based on how he perceives the passionate shepherds to his love. Sir Walter has a different perception of the nature romantics; he presents a contrast in his poem. Christopher Marlowe and Sir Walter Raleigh are having a dialogue which is contradictory dialogue.
The Passionate Shepherd To His Love; by Christopher Marlowe and The Nymph’s Reply To The Shepherd by: Sir. Walter Raleigh. The purpose of this writing is to compare and contrast the two speakers point of view in the poem. I will also be discussing the four major themes of the: Passionate Shepherd To His Love and The Nymph's reply To The Shepherd, such as nature, love, material world, and time. I will be using evidence and lines from the two pastoral poems to help support my answers.
Christ is the leader of the Church, Paul in Ephesians 1:22 said “God placed everything under his feet and appointed him to be head over everything for the Church” however, God entrusted the authority to lead to his servant whom he set them aside to lead the community. Pastor as a public Leadership is to lead community. A person who is called by God to lead public has a responsibility to be in the community, with the community and for the community. One of best questions raised in the class during public leadership discussion was “How we can be a community pastor rather than just a church pastor?” This really a kind of question we are to consider as pastor especially as rural congregation pastor. In most cases when pastor are called to