The Necessity Of Salary Restrictions In Professional Sports

Three out of four of the most popular sports in America all have salary caps in their organization. Salary caps are meant to keep the league competitive, control cost and increase overall league revenues. Sports that are seen as more competitive and fun to watch will boost tv ratings which will then lead to higher profits from their sales and advertisement. Without a salary cap, big named teams that are popular and successful will have more money for free agency to stack their team, since they can make the best offers. In the MLB there is not a salary cap, which puts teams like the New York Yankees or the Los Angeles Dodgers that have more money than other teams in an advantage. You can see what teams will be successful in the MLB before the

College athletes should be paid because they bring in millions of dollars for their respected colleges every year. College athletes perform in front of millions of people. Colleges sell athletes jerseys or other merchandise of a player. College athletes put in hours upon hours of work on and off the field but they don't get anything for it. These are the reasons college athletes should be paid.

Major League Baseball is the only major professional sport that does not have a salary cap (the maximum in total payroll that a team can pay its players). For example, the National Football League has a salary cap for 2004 of about $75 million and the National Basketball Association has a salary cap for 2004 of approximately $44 million. There are multiple reasons for a salary cap but two of the underlying reasons are parity (equality) and competitiveness. It is assumed that without a salary cap, large market teams such as New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago will be able to ‘buy up’ all the good players leaving the small market cities such as Minneapolis, Cincinnati, and Phoenix with the less-talented left-overs. Additionally, teams that win more games and make the playoffs and World Series receive extra revenue from TV, thereby creating even more of a discrepancy if large market teams have an advantage in winning more games and playing in the post-season.

Imagine a darkened evening in the spring the lights are slowly warming up to illuminate the field in which the cleats of the great will graze the grass and scuff up the freshly dragged dirt. The crowd is feeling anxiety to know if the umpire is going to call the pitch a ball or a strike. This is in the mind of every person that comes out to support their local major league baseball team. In recent decades the sport of baseball has become criticized for the amount of money that the owners pay their players for their services. The question On the minds of not only the general public, but to the owners and the fans is the salary paid to the players. Major League baseball players are paid too much.

Another major argument used to support paying college athletes is to say college athletics is a large business. Supporters say that college athletes should be paid because the extremely large organization known as the NCAA is making lucrative amounts of money off of them, and what they do is considered a business (Frederick, 2013). They argue that the extreme amounts of money the NCAA earns from these athletes is too much, and that they can afford to compensate the athletes for the large amount of money they generate. College athletes sign a letter of intent to play for a specific university knowing that the school will generate large amounts of money off of their appearance, and performance. If college athletes do not agree with the fact that universities and the NCAA will make large sums of money from them they should not play

There are conversations about how football and basketball players should be paid, that’s the basis of pay-for-play, but if you pay the boys you have to pay the girls as stated in title XI. If things aren’t as equal as possible the NCAA simply wont allow it. They would have lawsuit after lawsuit if colleges weren’t able to spread the wealth to everyone, man or woman it has to be equal. It’s that simple.

College athletes demonstrate a high quality of balance, between school work, work they put on the field, and managing a personal life as well. Athletic scholars are people who work as hard or if not harder than an average american works in his/her profession and should be paid for it! My view on this topic is that if you truly work in the classroom, have the grades, work on the field and show that you deserve to represent the university in which you’re attending, then you deserve a share of the money collected from the multi billion dollar association the NCAA. Most athletes that earn a scholarship get about 25,000 dollars a year. According to Forbes athletes are given about 7 dollars for a meal when traveling and anything more given is

Division 1 sports have increased monstrously among Americans in the course of recent decades. Division 1 college athletes should be paid because players are giving up their bodies for their school, it will keep more players in school, and to ensure an equal distribution of the revenue that the players bring to the school. This has expanded incomes for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the participating universities which has fueled the level headed discussion of whether school competitors ought to be paid past their athletic grants. In the course of recent decades, Division 1 sports have increased tremendously in the United States. Regardless of whether it be football, basketball, or hockey, etc. as far back as the start of the century, college athletics have gotten an overflow of income to their separate universities, and additionally enhancing the college's notoriety. For instance, in a review led by the Orlando Sentinel, it was evaluated that the University of Texas' Athletic Program had the most astounding income of some other University at

Professional athletes all around the world bring in sum of the largest paychecks around, but college athletes, though they work just as hard, see no compensation for their efforts. As of today, college athletes are not paid, and never have been. Even with the insane amount of money that both colleges and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) make from the athletes’ hard earned accomplishments. There are many college athletes that, though they are working hard to meet the expectations of colleges, still have to pay off their college expenses while being used by colleges to bring in lots of revenue. They are working harder than any other student on any college campus, balancing their sport and education, so shouldn’t they be rewarded?

The cost of college sends many families entering the concept of debt and debating whether or not to risk the money to send a child or children to college. Be that as it may, 1%-2% of college bound students receive athletic scholarships, adding up to a total of over $1 billion a year. Even though large sums of money are handed out and many athletes chose to go to college many of them do not take the opportunity to finish and the remaining scholarship is wasted. College athletes that receive a form of financial aid or scholarships should be required to stay a full four years; otherwise, if they choose to abandon their education they should have to repay the remaining scholarship so it is not wasted. Requiring an athlete to stay a full four years gives them the option to explore other

In today’s society money is everything. The common consensus is that the more money you have the better the you life is. Greed makes the world go round. Nowhere is this more prominent or obvious than in the world of sports. In fact one of the main problem with college sports, specifically the NCAA, today is that athletes are not getting an education, thus when they inevitably stop playing sports they often don’t fare so well in the real world. And why are they not getting educated? Money of course.

College is a stimulating time for students, and all the madness begins before the semester even starts. Time is spent gathering books, reading the required material before starting the class, rummaging through the stores for school supplies, getting your apartment/dorm set up, working to pay for life, and much, much more. But, being in college is a altered world for college athletes. Their time in college is devoted to learning but equally devoted to the sport they play. A student athlete doesn’t have time for a job, puts their body on the line every day, and doesn’t have any extra time. College sports bring in billions of dollars each year through marketing, broadcast contracts, ticket sales and merchandising so, why aren’t college athletes receiving a salary?

In addition to the subject of money, Major League Baseball players, on average, make very good money. Looking back to before 1970, the average salary was only about $30,000. Twenty years later it was $500,000 and by the year 2000, the salary rose to $1.5 million, all the way up to now where the average salary in the major leagues is $4 million (Berg). With an average salary this high, even the backup players and those who do not possess once-in-a-generation talents, can make a very good living without ever stepping on the field. Another perk of being a Major League Baseball player is that they are allowed $100.50 in meal money when on the road (Berg). One can assume from a fact such as this that even in the midst of long road trips, which can be three or four games per series and could possibly have several of them in a row, that they eat well which helps keep up their energy levels for trips like

Professional baseball players work tirelessly to perfect their craft and deserve to be paid adequately. Another reason the MLBPA chooses to keep a free labor market is that with a more open labor market, team revenues can steadily increase and lead to increased player salaries. A negative side effect of this, however, is that teams can receive and use supplementary party revenues, which can help outbid competitors for top-tier free agents, and raise the cost of a player beyond the means of teams with fewer or no supplementary revenues (Zimbalist 24). Under this circumstance, which is currently the present state of MLB, a salary cap may become a sensible solution. On the other hand, if a salary cap system was in place, teams might be tempted to cheat by underreporting total revenues.

In each of the major sports leagues (NFL, MLB, NHL, NBA), free agency is usually a period of big spending, crazy contracts and fresh looks to some teams. With the drastic rise in the salary cap, NBA free agency has been no different this summer. The contracts NBA players have received, compared to those given to some of the star players in other major sports, have been amazing.