There are always trade-offs whenone think about security. The motion of the suspension of fexemption lies at the root of the line of reasoning concerning Homeland Security. Native landProtection . Open nature of democratic communities shuffle the social bodily structure open to attack qualifying civil freedoms is far more dangerous than more expressed threats presented by tthe act of terrorism . Decreasing civil impropriety limits personal freedom and steps-up government major power . Civil liberties means individual Freedom society have under a system of law there are two major approaches the first favoring strong security at any cost ignores human right field and unfair treatment and the emphasized civil liberties. Second favoring civil liberties draws attention from security while emphasizing human rightfulness . So is there a balance. Human rights focus on the legal right to exist in a community of citizenry ; where people are free from arbitrary corieon. Human right intersect terrorism and Homeland Security into areas. The first terrorist attacks on instant civilians violate the right of the people to exist apart from political violence against innocent people. And governments countering terrorist must keep respectfulness the human rights of their opponents. As we change how we conflict War it affects the structure of Civil Society. . Terrorist fighting against the way people live fighting terrorism involves saving and tribute of social order .To defend against
After the September 11 terrorist attacks, the United States and other developed countries changed their assumed view of the threat from terrorism. Massive amount of resources were mobilized in a very short time to counter the perceived and actual threat from terrorists and terrorist organizations. In the U.S., this change was pushed as a necessity for what was called "Homeland Security”. It went through the enactment of hundreds of statutes and regulations, substantial changes in policy initiatives, the most massive governmental reorganization since 1947, and brought the new business of homeland security to the face of American awareness. Soon after the terrorist attacks, Congress passed various new laws and enhanced some existing ones
Homeland and counter-terrorism programs outlines the policies needed to improve U.S. and global security in the 21st century. The policies analyze how the U.S. and foreign allies will work together toward goals by combating terrorism and their organizations. According to Joint Publication 3-26 (2014), joining with other key partners and allies to develop strategies and theater campaigns plans, helps protect U.S. interest in a common security agenda. This approach not only strengthens the U.S. but it also expands the international multilateral counter-terrorism agenda. For instance, U.S. policies heighten conversation on homeland security and counter-terrorism because it aims to serve globally and nationally. After the twin towns were attack, the department of Homeland Security created a policy called Homeland Security ACT 2002. This act covers multiple areas that needed improvement but it also gave an understand what is expected for security and the future of the country going forward. Science & technology, immigration, emergency response, and bioterrorism, are some of the policies that were created under the Homeland
With many nations on high alert, The United States must act on tighter immigration laws. Implementing Homeland Security after 9/11 was a start, but it has not been enough. With the most recent terrorist attacks in San Bernardino, and The Boston Marathon proves are system is broken. The continuous attacks of terror in Paris, Pakistan, and Brussels within the last several months our government must act now before it's to late before another 9/11 happens.
In 1995, Kevin Jack Riley and Bruce Hoffman published their study Domestic Terrorism: A National Assessment of State and Local Preparedness to examine the issues and problems state and local law enforcement agencies faced while dealing with the threat of terrorism in the United States. More specifically, researchers sought to identify how agencies at those two different levels perceived the terrorist threat in the United States, as well as learning how those agencies manage the threat of terrorism and plan and organize their response to actual incidents (Riley & Hoffman, 1995). In order to collect the data needed, the study was broken down into three separate research phases: (1) a national survey of state and local law enforcement agencies designed to assess how those law enforcement agencies perceive the threat of terrorism in the United States and to identify potential anti- and counter-terrorism programs currently used by those jurisdictions; (2) the selection of ten locations, chosen after completion of survey, as case studies to examine in detail how different jurisdictions have adapted to the threat of terrorism and to explain further the anti- and counter-terrorism programs used by those jurisdictions; and (3) the identification of programs used by state and local law enforcement agencies to counter potential future threats along with the development of a prospective future research agenda (Riley & Hoffman, 1995).
Today, domestic terrorism is one of the major threats to the national security of the US. Since 9/11, the US intelligence services and law enforcement agencies viewed international terrorism as the major threat to the public security of the US but the threat of domestic terrorism has been underestimated. At any rate, American law enforcement agencies conduct active campaigns to prevent international terrorism but domestic terrorism become a serious threat to the national security of the US. In such a way, the US needs to develop effective strategies to prevent the rise of domestic terrorism. Otherwise, the US may face a threat of the consistent growth of domestic terrorism as do some European countries, such as the UK, for instance. Therefore, law enforcement agencies should focus their attention on the prevention of domestic terrorism because, even though domestic terrorism is unseen, it may be even more dangerous than international terrorism. Domestic terrorists undermine the country from within, while international terrorists attack the US from the outside and the US can raise barriers to protect Americans from the foreign threat, while domestic terrorism needs effective work of law enforcement agencies nationwide. Therefore, domestic terrorism is a serious threat to the national security of the US and American law enforcement agencies along legislators and the public have to unite their efforts in the struggle against domestic terrorism.
In today’s world security and civil liberties has become a balancing act. Antiterrorism is defined as incorporates the practice, military tactics, techniques, and strategy that government, military, police, violent non-state actors and business organizations use to combat or prevent terrorism. Civil liberties are the personal guarantees and freedoms that the government cannot abridge, by law, constitution, or judicial interpretation. The government to underhand violations of civil liberties has used the fears of terrorism since the 9/11 attacks. Without realizing it the American people are in some way or form trading civil liberties for a better sense of security.
What means to be an American is to be exceptional, admiring values and principles, seeking human rights, protecting freedom and privacy, providing opportunities to whom is seeking to, believing in American dream and seeking to expend it through good example. On the other hand, to become an American, a person does not have to be of any particular national, linguistic, religious, or ethnic background. All he has to do is to commit himself to the political ideology centered on the abstract ideals of liberty, equality, democracy, and republicanism . Although multiple security challenges has threaten the United States, none of them threaten
I do believe that domestic terrorism is still a treat within the United States because of the current violence against civilian population like black lives matter, the KKK or those that randomly attack our police officers. There attentions are to intimidate the everyday law bidding citizens in an attempt to their way of thinking our beliefs. “Homegrown terrorists are produced a number of ways. The first involves individuals who become radicalized by personal experiences. The second might involve a similar pat to radicalization, but it also involves some type of foreign connections.” (White 2014 p. 323) These are the ones that may have parents or other family members from another country and attempt to attack U.S. citizens. I believe that
are sworn to serve. In order to do this law enforcement need to understand the
Terrorism is a massive problem--everybody realizes that. Regardless of origin, culture, country, or political standpoint, every sane person understands that terrorism is something that is still relatively prevalent in the world, and something needs to be done about it. The problem, however, is that there is no easy solution. The United States tends to take overbearing control and responsibility for all terrorist threats, groups, and attacks, but this is simply not reasonable. Although we cannot expect every country to take initiative against terrorist threats like ISIS, sustained international coordination is necessary to effectively confront transnational terrorist groups (Shirkey). This way, the US can begin taking care of themselves and their own country, as they still have many issues that have yet to be solved. While working together is important, though, it is not the key to solving the problem. What we must do in addition is investigate and address the root causes of terrorism, and analyse them in detail in order to best combat terrorist groups at their roots.
The purpose of this paper is to define and give as much detail information about Homeland Security in the United States and law enforcement and how they are integrated. I hope after reading this paper you will be well informed on the duties and responsibilities of these agencies. People have always lived in fear but with the help of these agencies we will no longer have to live in fear. I will try to give as much detail information as possible to help with any problems or situation that might come up. Homeland Security in the United States and law enforcement have extensive research skills and knowledge in serving and protecting citizens and other important groups and agencies. Homeland Security is a new agency that was created by the president to handle terrorist threats and to aid the country in an emergency situation. Since September 11th the threat level for terrorist attacks on America have increase over years. The Presidents of the United States vows to never let an attack happen on American soil again that’s why Homeland security was created. According to the Homeland security act the mission statements is to prevent terrorist attacks within the United States, reduce America’s vulnerability to terrorism, and minimize the damage and recover from attacks that do occur is Homeland Security Actions. The Department of Homeland Security is responsible in making the nation safe and secure by protecting borders and transportation systems to prevent terrorist attacks. Law
Besides, our personal security application is also valuable as a security information collector. At the scene of the crime or a potential one, our application can collect visual, acoustic data at the site rapidly before the evidence disappears in a twinkling and record inconspicuous details which might be ignored at beginning but later on could become the crucial evidence. One of the Homeland Security Department’s five crucial responsibilities is securing borders of United States. It includes Southern border, Northern border, and air and sea ports. Every year, DHS apprehends and deports more than one million illegal immigrants. In 2009, DHS announced a new initiative to build up security on the Southwest border, in a bid to disrupt the drug,
In homeland security they have many strategies to help protect the United States. Whether it is preventing a terrorist attack, or preventing a natural disaster. Homeland security has a strategy to make sure that everything works out. Now to give a brief background, President George Bush came up with the national homeland security strategy in July, 2002 after the attack of September, 11th. “The strategy set forth overall objectives to prevent terrorist attacks within the United States, reduce America’s vulnerability to terrorism, and minimize the damage and assist in the recovery from attacks that occur (Rabkin).” Now in November of that same year, the Homeland Security Act, was passed into a law furthermost creating the department
Understanding Homeland Security’s (HS) mission, tasks, duties, responsibilities, and operations is important. It is important because providing security is necessary to protect this country. HS can have different meaning and is a topic of debate for many scholars who try and define HS. This is not a debate or the focus, and HS needs to be a team effort by all Americans to keep this nation free (Bellavita, 2008). One thing for sure is that terrorism needs to be checked on a daily basis. Many agencies work together providing security to prevent terrorist attacks to the homeland. According to Bellavita (2008), federal, state and local governments, by the private sector, and by individuals all have a homeland role in preventing terrorist attacks within the United States. Additionally, providing security is challenging because America has a surrounding ocean from east to west, and to the south. Also, Canada is to the north and the borders span a numerous amount of miles. Where would HS’s mission fall when all these borders need protection? One mission for HS is to provide necessary resources to protect and prevent terrorist attacks. When resources are determined, other federal agencies may get involved to determine how the resources can be utilized to provide security (Cusic, 2009).
Homeland Security was created to protect not only the persons living and infrastructures within the U.S. but outside as well. Though its existence, homeland security has done a spectacular job due to the fact that the country is still standing. There are many persons and countries that would love to see America fall flat on its face. Through corrective policy action and growth within our intelligence functions we are now as strong as we were before. Nonetheless, Homeland security may still have its flaws.