The Heartland Institute: Summary and Major Findings on Climate Change

In his essay titled “Climate of Denial”, Al Gore, a well known environmental advocate and former vice president, verifies the reality of climate change and global warming. The piece is an attack on corrupt companies and news outlets that attempt to persuade the public that global warming is not a critical issue. Gore also earnestly conveys our environment’s current state and offers possible solutions that would increase awareness about global warming and begin to revert the planet back to a healthier, more sustainable state. The overarching purpose of Gore’s work is to call attention to the widespread climate change that is occurring. However, he also focuses on the corruption and bias within the media, and their attempts to conceal the truth about global warming. Writing to those who are conflicted about who to believe, he makes a valid argument that defends the beliefs of he and his fellow activists and encourages others to become more active in the climate change issue.

Another group of scientists would disagree with Schmidt. In June, the Sixth International Conference on Climate Change took place in Washington D.C. It was organized by The Heartland Institute, headquartered in Chicago, and its primary objective is to "dispute the claim that global warming is a

The problem that the pro- global warming theorists have created is that of social standing and little else. While there may be scientific backing to support some of the theory, the media presents the problem with great sensationalism. Global warming and energy conservation has thus become a trend and losses some of its validity through this. The scare tactics used by the media to “promote awareness” are just that, a linguistic ploy to gain favor. “Awareness of this global threat reinforced public concern and environmental problems and thereby provided environmental activists, scientists, and policy makers with new momentum in their efforts to promote environmental protection.” (McCright, 2000) This statement draws line to the potential benefits that would be received if the pro-global warming theorists were to draw enough attention to the issue. Driven by social empowerment and conviction to environmental protection, these activists misrepresent the actual threat and paint it as being much more

Global warming is hot topic nowadays. Alarmists and scientists fight to make their statements known, but while the alarmists avoid the scientist, non-governmental organizations pass themselves as scientist. They not only give out exaggerated data, they also have the nerve to accuse humans of being the cause of global warming. Also, we cannot be certain that we are being told the truth without knowing exactly what is really going on behind the scenes. We blindly trust those in authority because we think that they have our greater good in mind and that whatever they say must be the truth.

Patterson expresses a fear that “Man will be convinced by these climate cultists to turn his back on the very political, economic, and scientific institutions that made him so powerful, so wealthy, so healthy”. By framing his argument in a way that transitions from highlighting the scientific ignorance of global warming to the policies that such a worldview could impact, Patterson attempts to establish a chain of logic that justifies his concern for global warming as an influence on government. The language used in the sentence (“climate cultists” trying to convince “Man”, turning their back on beneficial institutions) also implies to the reader that the proponents of global warming are actively attempting to undermine the institutions that have allowed humankind to thrive in the modern world. This opinion is underlined later in the article, when Patterson contemplates why many “hope” for climate change catastrophe.

Some research shows that climate change is a load of crap. Climate change is a natural event that occurs in cycles of warmings and ice ages, some examples of which are: ice age about 10000 years ago; Mediterranean see froze to ice a few centuries ago; Sea shell in the Artic Ocean suggest a period of warming. The spontaneous worldwide eruption of volcanoes and peak of meteorite and asteroid activity during the dinosaur era would bring more damage to climate that we humans. This year winter in Toronto lasted until April rather than February – where’s the global warming? These so called “scientists” create speculations of these so called “global warming”, “carbon foot print” etc. and conduct these so called “researches” to continue being financed and receive guaranteed income. On the other hand, United Nations is a organization filled with a bunch of bias bureaucrats. In other words, the chain of bureaucrats between the investing party and the so called “Climate Fund” pocket a good chunk of the monetary funds before they even reach the over exaggerated or even non-existing issue. Other examples include excessive and unnecessary spending on “infrastructure” and “job creation”. Rona Ambrose, interim leader of Conservative Party Canada brings up a few good points on unnecessary spending, what she referred to as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s

In 2007, 85% of Americans were convinced that global warming was happening. Ever since then numbers have been steadily lowering (Stanford University). Each year, less Americans have become aware of climate change although climate change has become a bigger threat to animals and humans. About 50% of Americans believe that action to prevent global warming should be taken right now (Yale University). However, a great deal of people do not believe that climate change is ruining the environment. They are just letting the environment get destroyed until it is too late. Americans should be aware and believe in global warming. The history and supporting information relates to the

Johnson also points out how interest groups and well paid lobbyist are continually fighting the good fight in congress and the media to get the word out. The author also states how the definition of global warming has now expanded to include any and every weather disturbance, change, irregularity, and spontaneity. The main goal of Johnson is to let people know that scientific theory according to Karl Popper proves that global warming is false and the

What the public knows and hears about scientific advancements and discoveries often lags behind the latest scientific work. Exxon Mobil, a major oil company, has funded research on pollution and climate change for the past several decades and has greatly contributed to the body of research showing that climate change and similar issues pose a great threat to humanity. Exxon has not actively held back research on climate change and has not funded anti-climate change groups for over a decade, seemingly giving them credibility in the public eye. However, in public statements and advertising Exxon has promoted that climate change is non-existent or not an issue. Exxon clearly has a lot to gain from misrepresenting their own research- if they had

Steve Coll, multiple Pulitzer Prize-winning author, in Private Empire ExxonMobil and American Power, explains “Exxon, and other A.P.I. members joined and newly and more broadly based group, Global Climate Coalition, with influential members from every part of the country and many different industries…A.P.I. also poured money into independent think tanks and advocacy groups that were predisposed to attack Kyoto” ( Steve Coll 85). This organization that was created shows how determined Exxon was to stop any form of policy to be enacted limiting their profitability. After Exxon began promoting climate change denial, the scientific community that once respected their research, now discourages their actions against the facts of climate

Propaganda infested the debate on climate change after interest groups’ increasingly high expenditures financed the argument against climate change. Although propaganda is blatantly common on both sides, the opponents’ weakest link is the science and therefore the logic. Phillips and the Americans for Prosperity abundantly spent on advertisements that persuaded the American public's opinion on climate change. These advertisements were full of logical fallacies, admittingly by Phillips. Eventually, the U.S. Senate took a delagate role where “constituents’ opinions and preferences [are] reflected in legislative opinion”. From the ground up, Americans for Prosperity’s money and propaganda convinced the U.S. Senate to vote against the cap-and-trade

Information from the Canadian Government website explains some factual information about what climate change is and how it is affecting Canada. From the website, it highlights some key information and basically explains what climate change is. It explains the causes and impacts of climate change and possible solutions to help the environment.

Everybody has heard of global warming and the anecdote that our grandchildren will never see a polar bear. Near apocalyptic warnings of the future we will have if we allow it to continue unchecked. However, there is a large faction of people who go out of their way to try to downplay the effects of global warming; these people are known as climate change deniers. Predominantly conservative, these people do everything in their power to undermine global warming for economic gain. Climate change denial has a big effect on the scientific community’s ability to focus on a solution to global warming and stems from misinformation and a value of public/personal opinion over scientific research.

Climate change is a heavily ignored subject to many industrialized countries and businesses. While 97 percent or more scientist agree on published peer-reviewed studies that climate change is real, many of the leading industries producing pollution turn a blind eye to the obvious detrimental effects that they are causing. In a multitude of studies on climate change data is showing rising sea levels and global temperature, warming of oceans and shrinking of ice sheets, decreased snow cover, ocean acidification, an increase of extreme events with exceeding power, rapidly declining arctic sea ice, and more. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which includes 1,300 independent climate change experts, have actualized 95

data to prove their stand- Global Warming is not man-made and is only propaganda to promote