The Evils of Cosmetic Animal Testing Essay

When using your cosmetic products on a daily basis, do you think of all the animals harmed and killed in the making? Cosmetics include products used by us every day, such as toothpaste, makeup, shampoo, soap, deodorant, etc. In the 1930s, the United States Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act compelled cosmetic companies to start testing the safety of their products on animals, beginning a long journey of violating animal rights. Since then, laws have changed, allowing companies to use alternatives that do not involve animals to test the safety of their products. Even though companies are not mandated to test on animals anymore, some still choose to do so for various reasons. Therefore, animal testing in the cosmetic industry is immoral because it is not mandatory and violates animals rights, and it has to end.

A new survey shows that, “72% of Americans oppose testing cosmetics products on animals” (Physicians Commitee). These people are real people, who say they won’t buy a product that is cruelly tested on animals like dogs, cats, sheep’s, or pigs. The number of animals tested are sadly increasing, “2,703 cats, 6,077 dogs, and 7,458 primates were used in testing for cosmetics in 2010” (USDA 26). These facts show exactly how many animals are used every year for torture for many cosmetic companies. These animals do not have the voice to speak for themselves, so it’s wrong to treat them like things, when they are creatures just like us. Consumers still continue to buy these products, but if only they knew that these products aren’t natural and are chemically

For hundreds of years, animals have been used to trial cosmetic products before released to the public. The majority of these companies strive to conceal the idea of harming animals for their products, to avoid harm to their reputation or profit. Animals are forced to inhale substances, have chemicals forced into eyes, and are stored in containers with several other diseased animals. These cruel actions cause a large percentage of the population to campaign against these companies. Protests, boycotts and social media awareness are all methods used by activists to promote their cause and to strive for a greater future for animals. These animal liberators induce the government to create laws to prevent harm to animals through cosmetic testing.

Over 100 million animals are crippled, burned, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year so people around the world can have red lips and winged eyeliner (“11 Facts About”). Cosmetic testing on living animals has become an outdated and cruel method of determining which products seem safe for the use of humans. This being said, animal testing is still prominent in the United States even though it is not mandatory to develop or sell products (“Cosmetic Testing”). Though better methods have been proven, other countries still require animal testing on any cosmetics being shipped into them. Their argument? Animals have been found to be the closest living beings to humans and, therefore, the most efficient

The process of using animals for cosmetic products is unnecessary and cruel. We already have many of the same cosmetic products. Such as shampoos, hairsprays, deodorants, toothpastes, and mascaras. Do we really need more of these products if it results in the death of innocent animal? There are many brands that do not test on animals. Many of these brands being very popular in this generation, for example Bath and Body Works, Victoria's Secret, MAC, and Urban Decay. Why can't we be satisfied with the products we have now?

The cosmetic industry continues to compose a large part of society for several centuries, dating all the way back to the ancient Egyptians. The $160 billion-a-year global industry encompasses products such as make-up, skin and hair care, fragrances, cosmetic surgery, health clubs, and diet pills. With the recent surge of both affordable and luxury products flooding the markets, “Americans [are] [spending more each year on beauty than they do on education,” allowing distributors, such as Sephora, to turn a large profit (The Economist). Nevertheless, many of these state-of-the-art products are subjects of animal testing. Animal testing for cosmetics products allows distributors to carry innovative products and high-demanded

Many of us are unaware of the sheer number of animals that undergo constant suffering in the name of human vanity. Animal testing was originally introduced in the early 20th century and is still prominent today. It is morally unacceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes. The procedures used in animal testing are cruel and inhumane, nor are they the most reliable source of data; resulting in many mishaps. Moreover, with the perpetual advancements in technology, there are several alternative methods making animal testing unnecessary. If testing cosmetics and drugs on humans is unacceptable, what makes it acceptable to test on animals?

　　The companies such as the body shop said that they do not experiment on animals and they produce good cosmetics who make money, I am not agree that making the cosmetics that make our faces better does not mean the animals must suffering in terrible ways, it does not seem moral for me. On the other hand we also use the animals for test the new drugs.

Animals lose their lives in a horrible way so that we can have useless things like makeup. A lot more brands use animals testing then society would think. By law before releasing a new medication it has to be tested many times on different animals first. One reason animal testing is horrible because it hurts them for not good reasons when there is more efficient ways to test products. (“Animal testing is a bad science”)

Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the necessity to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.

Sure the final product may look pretty, but is it really worth it to test these products that could be toxic, on defenceless animals? When people go shopping for cosmetics they can never picture the product being meant for humans, being used on a defenceless creature such as a bunny or a mouse. The test are not as accurate as testing on a human. In most cases the animals are never able to live the life they were meant to. People using animals to test human products on is pointless for many reasons.

Animal testing has been a controversy long debated over. However, more recently cosmetic animal testing has been a focus for many people. Cosmetic animal testing includes experimenting with cosmetics on guinea pigs, hamsters, mice, rabbits, and rats. According to the Food and Drug Administration cosmetics are anything used on the human body with the intention of beautifying or cleansing. Some examples of these include lipstick, face makeup, deodorant, perfume, nail polish, shampoo, hair dyes, any ingredient used in a cosmetic, and many more. Human Society International stated that about 100,000-200,000 suffer and die each year due to cosmetic testing. In the U.S cosmetic animal testing is legal, however, there are certain

Some people think that using animals for cosmetics,and testing cosmetics on animals is good and helps the animals and people, others think it’s wrong….. Women, who are the major consumers of cosmetics, largely oppose animal testing of cosmetics, with 72 percent of those polled opposed. Most women - 70 percent - think animal testing of cosmetics should be illegal. Strong majorities of women think animal testing of cosmetics should be illegal, regardless of age, level of education or ethnicity. 68 percent of voters know that animals are used to test the safety of cosmetics.Three in four voters say that they would feel safer, or as safe, if non-animal methods were used to test the safety of a cosmetic instead of animal testing. The survey of 802 U.S. registered voters, including 206 via cell phone, was conducted by Lake Research Partners from Feb. 5 - 11, 2013, and was commissioned by The HSUS and HSLF. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.47 percent. The questions and results can be viewed here.

In today’s society, there are billions of cosmetic products for sale. There are whole stores dedicated to cosmetics alone. Aisles upon aisles are lined with products designed to make a person look better, smell better, feel better. Behind those products though, there is a hideous truth. Those very products, designed to make a person beautiful, are tested on animals in order to be deemed safe enough for human use. Many organizations have campaigns to combat the issue. One such organization is the National Animal Protection Agency in Italy. The image above is one of their various campaigns to stop cosmetic testing on animals. Many of the aspects in the image above provide deeper meaning than what is realized at first glance and help provide more information on the topic.

Animal testing has been around since ancient times and it's been used to benefit both animal and human health problems. Researchers would use animals at first out of curiosity to discover what was inside animals. However, after some time they started using animals for surgical procedures first performing them on them and then if they were successful on people. But in recent years there have been groups who condemn animal testing and categorize it as inhumane and cruel. They believe that people shouldn’t use animals for testing because its only for human selfish needs. They aren’t able to see the big picture they only see a small amount which is cosmetic companies using animals for testing but that's not the only thing animals are used in variety of experiments to help advance for the future. However, to the people that