Cosmetic Testing On Animals Research Paper

A lot of people buy cosmetic products being ignorant to the fact that, that one product has killed a lot of animals. How would you like being sprayed with poisonous liquids, taking poisonous eye drops?, or being fed toxic substances? Cosmetic factories have been doing these inhumane things and more to innocent animals for years.

This picture shows the photograph of a beautiful kid, compared to the one of a rat with red eyes, which is normally a symbol for disgust. The choice of this images leads the audience to believe that the girl’s life is more important than one of an animal. Source D also exposes the idea of Eileen Youtie, a breast cancer patient, she says that she doesn’t see animal testing as animal abuse, “It’s not testing cosmetics. It’s trying to save my life.” Indeed “animal experiments are essential for the development of new medicines, and for safety testing” (Festing).

When using your cosmetic products on a daily basis, do you think of all the animals harmed and killed in the making? Cosmetics include products used by us every day, such as toothpaste, makeup, shampoo, soap, deodorant, etc. In the 1930s, the United States Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act compelled cosmetic companies to start testing the safety of their products on animals, beginning a long journey of violating animal rights. Since then, laws have changed, allowing companies to use alternatives that do not involve animals to test the safety of their products. Even though companies are not mandated to test on animals anymore, some still choose to do so for various reasons. Therefore, animal testing in the cosmetic industry is immoral because it is not mandatory and violates animals rights, and it has to end.

With the buyers as audience it may change their minds when purchasing cosmetic products as to look for cruelty free products and to make a movement to stand up for animal rights.

Cruelty-free cosmetic brands are an advancement that will better the safety of animals and people. To exemplify, the Sydney Morning Herald states that, “It’s very difficult to work out the health hazards of synthetic hair dyes, sunscreens and preservatives using animal tests” (Page 1). Products used on animals will get different outcomes compared to humans. A product that is made for a human needs to be tested on a human to get accurate results. Testing products on an animal can have certain chemicals that humans can withstand while it can harm the animal. People do not go around using animal products on themselves because of the reactions they can get from them. Additionally, in the text, 3D-printing human skin: The end of animal testing, “bioprinted tissues could also make product testing cheaper and more accurate, cutting down the need for tests on animals” (Mendoza 1). Cosmetic lines are taking the initiative to produce products with no intentions of testing on animals. With the worry people have with side effects of products on human trials; scientists want to see where the options of technology can

The purpose is to spread awareness of the pain and torment behind animal testing for the sake of cosmetics. They want people to know the cold hard truth behind makeup companies such as Estee Lauder, Lancome, Clinique, Mac, Loreal, and Revlon that are harming thousands of animals every year. Even if a company doesn't test their products on animals, if they sell in China, they cannot be considered cruelty-free since the Chinese government requires cosmetic testing on all makeup including imported products. Just because brands such as, Nars and Covergirl don't test on products sold in the U.S. doesn't make them cruelty-free. Fortunately, other countries have enforced laws and regulations against animal testing.

For hundreds of years, animals have been used to trial cosmetic products before released to the public. The majority of these companies strive to conceal the idea of harming animals for their products, to avoid harm to their reputation or profit. Animals are forced to inhale substances, have chemicals forced into eyes, and are stored in containers with several other diseased animals. These cruel actions cause a large percentage of the population to campaign against these companies. Protests, boycotts and social media awareness are all methods used by activists to promote their cause and to strive for a greater future for animals. These animal liberators induce the government to create laws to prevent harm to animals through cosmetic testing.

Utilizing animals as a part of research and to test the safety of items has been a subject of intense arguments for a considerable length of time. Individuals have distinctive affections for animals; numerous look upon animals as partners while others see animals as a methods for propelling medical research or encouraging exploratory research. However people see animals, the reality remains that animals are being misused by research offices and cosmetic organizations across the nation and all around the globe. In spite of the fact that people frequently benefit from effective animal research, the agony, the suffering, and the death of animals are not worth the hypothetical benefits for humans. Thus, animals should not be tested on for product safety or research.

Many of America’s favorite go-to skin care products and cosmetics are tested on animals. Despite that, there are products on the market that use alternative testing procedures yet are still considered safe and effective. In the article titled Animal Testing on Cosmetics written by author Ian Murnaghan, the controversy of animal testing in cosmetics is referred to when he says, “The practice is particularly controversial because animals may experience discomfort, suffering and ultimately die, all in the name of aesthetics and 'looking good.’”. Much of what he says in this quote can be applied to extremely popular cosmetic brands like Sephora , Almay, and Revlon who all use animal testing to build their products to maximum use. Brands that compare to these are ELF, Too Faced, and Physicians Formula who all claim to using alternative procedures to show the importance of being

Imagine being born, only to live a life of torture. You are brought to a lab, and cruelly tested on against your will. Toxins poured into your eyes, painful injections to your skin, then left to die when you’re no longer useful. Although many do not realize it, people use products tested on animals in their everyday lives. For girls, many of your favorite makeup brands, such as Estee Lauder, Makeup Forever, and Maybelline take part in animal testing. Products such as toothpaste, cologne, deodorant, laundry detergent, razors, and even band-aids aren’t tested innocently, either. As a makeup enthusiast, I am passionate about how the products I use daily are tested. Today I will help you understand what animal testing is and how it started, how it’s currently affecting animals around the world, and what organizations are doing to help make a difference in the future. To begin, I will explain the history of animal testing. An animal test is any scientific experiment or test in which a live animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause them pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm.(https://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/why-we-do-it/what-animal-testing) Animal experiments are not the same as taking your animal to the vet. Animals used in laboratories are harmed, not for their own good, and usually killed at the end of an experiment. Animal experiments include injecting or force feeding animals with potentially harmful substances, exposing animals to radiation,

Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the necessity to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.

Everyday cosmetic products that many people use, such as lipsticks, shampoo, face wash, etcetera, are verified to be safe using animal testing. Chemical burns and other short term ailments are very serious concerns that plague Americans and the knowledge that the products they use will not harm them and their families is possible because of animal testing. Also long term effects, such as cancer, have been discovered through animal product testing and promptly stopped saving countless lives. “NOT TESTED ON ANIMALS YOU’RE THE GUINEA PIG” (Source C). Living day to day with the risk that the products trusted to use on your children and yourself is enough to validate

When people wear lipstick, eyeshadow, and use medication does anyone every think about what's behind these products? Millions of animals are abused every year just so humans can use these so called necessities. If this cruel technique of animal testing continues, the societies animals will be lost. Many animals die because cosmetic companies test their products on innocent animals, as well as medical researchers. Some people will never stop this practice, but as a society there can be solutions found that benefit both the animals and the companies. Animal testing is a serious issue that many people refuse to solve, but many actions can be taken to help the poor animals involved.

Some people think that using animals for cosmetics,and testing cosmetics on animals is good and helps the animals and people, others think it’s wrong….. Women, who are the major consumers of cosmetics, largely oppose animal testing of cosmetics, with 72 percent of those polled opposed. Most women - 70 percent - think animal testing of cosmetics should be illegal. Strong majorities of women think animal testing of cosmetics should be illegal, regardless of age, level of education or ethnicity. 68 percent of voters know that animals are used to test the safety of cosmetics.Three in four voters say that they would feel safer, or as safe, if non-animal methods were used to test the safety of a cosmetic instead of animal testing. The survey of 802 U.S. registered voters, including 206 via cell phone, was conducted by Lake Research Partners from Feb. 5 - 11, 2013, and was commissioned by The HSUS and HSLF. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.47 percent. The questions and results can be viewed here.

Over the years, it has been a vast ethical and legal debate about using animals for cosmetic testing. Recently the European Union (EU) has taken steps to stop animal testing. According to PETA, the EU has banned the sale of any cosmetic ingredients that have been tested on animals. This means that any cosmetic company who wishes to sell in the EU, must cease animal testing. Unfortunately, this has incited little change in the United States and its views toward animal testing. Even though there are so many cruelty free options available, many manufactures in the U.S. still continue to experiment with animals. What is even more horrific is that the U.S. does not require animal testing to be conducted to determine if a product is safe or not.