The Civil War: The Missouri Compromise

One of the reasons for the Missouri compromise was to maintain a balance between the slave states and the free states. In order to become a slave state, there has to be a state that wants to be a free state so that it’s even. The pro-slavery states were in the South and the anti-slavery were in the North and the Missouri compromise would keep those states evenly numbered. There would also be an

The missour compromise, north wanted the state to be free of slaves while south wanted it to be involved with slavery. Now in the end, it was decided that Maine was to be the free state and Missouri was given the ok to adopt a constitution having no restrictions on slavery. This compromise was the foundation of conflict for the north and south regarding slavery. The kansas-nebraska allowed each territory to make the decision on the issue of slavery. This compromie violated the first compromise, missouri. Because of this violence begin in many parts of America, and later became better known as the civil war. Third compromise was the nullification, power to nullify, or invalidate any federal law in which the state thinks it is unconstiutional.

The Missouri Compromise was one of the great landmark episodes in a series of events that slowly led up to a fracturing of the northern and southern states which constitute the United States of America. Eventually, over time, and with the addition of other factors, this fracture would grow into the American Civil War. The Missouri compromise is not simply a bygone event, it is an important component of American history and it’s effects have altered the course of history. Had things gone differently the United States might have become a very different sort of place than it is today.

The Missouri Compromise, formulated by Henry Clay, was meant to regulate slavery in the country’s western territories. It also admitted Missouri as a slave state, and at the same time declared that states could not enter the union as a slave state if they were above 36’ 30”. In addition, it added Maine into the United States and balanced the ratio of slave and free states. This compromise was agreed upon both pro and anti-slavery factions, and passed in 1820. However, the Missouri Compromise was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska

of New York was the first to suggest a solution. He offered two amendments to the Missouri Statehood bill: the first prohibited any further importation of slaves into Missouri, and the second required the gradual emancipation for the slaves already there. These amendments were passed in the House of Representatives, where the North had the advantage, but in the Senate they were rejected. Tallmadge Jr.’s amendments in fact, did little to contribute to the peace of the Union.

The Missouri Compromise resolved a potentially disastrous power struggle between the northern “free” states and the southern “slave” states. In 1819, the United States appeared to be split evenly by having 11 free states and 11 slave states. Both sides vary in separate economic and political ideologies. The Missouri Compromise is all about the admission of states to the Union, balance of power within Congress, and of course, compromise.

First off The Missouri Compromise was a compromise due to the delicacy between number of slave and free states that were ratified into statehood. Missouri wanted to join the Union as a slave state but that would unbalance the powers in congress. The Government made a two part plan to deal with that issue by: first they would add Maine as a free state in the north and second they made an imaginary line that should any new state want to apply for statehood could not be a slave state if they were to lie above the southern border of Missouri. This showed the first compromise to geographically touch on what is most likely the worst thing in American History in

In February of 1819, Missouri applied for statehood in the United States. Because of the North’s consistent increase in population, it took the upper hand in national politics in the House of Representatives. Before the North began increasing its population in substantial numbers, the southern states had had the upper hand in Congress, in part because of the Three-Fifths Compromise, which gave them more representation in the House of Representatives, due to their slave population. At the time, the Senate was divided in national politics, because eleven states were free states, and eleven states were slave states ("The Civil War in Missouri").

The Missouri Compromise was a temporary solution to the issue of slavery and territorial rights such as the movement West. Two areas of land wanted to become states in 1820, known as Maine and Missouri. Maine wanted to enter as a free state with no slavery as everyone in that area was against it and wanted it abolished. Missouri wanted to enter as a slave state and was all for slavery and wanted it to be spread all throughout the country. The compromise everyone came into conclusion with, was that there would be no slavery allowed north of 36° 30’ latitude. This angered the Southerners because their intention was to promote slavery not have it abolished. They realized that this compromise threatened the balance between free and slave states; Maine and Missouri. In order to expand slavery, the South felt that the United States would need territory from Mexico. The only area of land left was in Arkansas and that line became known as the Missouri Compromise line. The impact that the Missouri Compromise had on the United States was tremendous and had many effects on issues such as national politics, the institution of slavery, and the overall togetherness of the nation as a whole.

In 1819, there were eleven free states and eleven slave states. Adding a new state would have tipped the balance in the senate in favor of the South. Three main parts of the Missouri Compromise was that Missouri became a slave state, Maine became a free state, and it banned slavery in new territories or states north of 36'30 latitude line. The South was happy that Missouri became a slave state, but Maine became a free state. The North was happy that Maine became a free state, but Missouri became a slave state.

Due to the completely opposite views on society, the states divided on whether or not they will be using slaves to improve their economy. An issue was the Missouri Compromise in 1820. Missouri insisted on becoming a slave state; however, America had a goal to

As a raging crisis was emerging, moderates and unionists were attempting to create a great compromise that would settle such issues. On January 29, 1850, Henry Clay has written a compromise and presented it to the Senate. The document consisted of admitting California as a free-state, the formation of territorial governments, and the abolition of slavery. Instead of a peaceful settlement, the resolutions launched a raging debate for seven months. As time went by, there has been numerous of events and court cases that led to the Civil War. The Compromise of 1850 was just the beginning of a series of debates in regards to slavery.

Due to industrialization in the north, the north was gaining majority seats in the House of Representatives (“Causes of the civil war- A northern perspective”). The Missouri Compromise in 1820 was an attempt to maintain balance between the states in support of and against slavery. The compromise encouraged people in the north to return runaway slaves and did not ban slavery, even in the free territories. There was agreement on the rights of the senate to make laws concerning

Missouri compromise – The Mississippi compromise, which represents the nation’s first extended debate over slavery’s expansion, preserved sectional balance and prohibited the formation of slave states north of the Mississippi compromise line.

In the 1830s the power of those who were against the slave trade was higher compared to those who were supporting slave trade. The claim for the obedience to the higher law of obedience to the existing constitutions showed that refugee in one can be termed as a refugee in all states. Therefore, slavery was not supposed to be practiced in individual states. The states that were practicing slavery were not adhering to the constitution; hence they were frustrating the federal