Team Based Incentive Pay Plan

If each team member meets their individual goals and deadlines, they will receive some smaller pre-defined bonus. This could be either a set amount or multiplier of the team bonus. (ex: 5 Individual Initiatives Met = 0.5x multiplier to team bonus).

Group Incentive Plan: It is set in place to promote helpful, combined behavior among employees. Through this company a group incentive plan assists in nurturing relationships among their staff member, inspiring them to discover ways to collaborate in a shared environment in order to be successful. The method is able to create a stronger team, brainstorming and building a entrusted sense of project ownership for everyone.

A Performance-Based Pay system is an increasingly popular compensation method used by organizations to increase productivity. A goal for all companies is to try and remain competitive and control costs, this is a reason for performance-based pay systems becoming more popular. This type of system attempts to link compensation to performance. (Gena Richter, 2002) These systems are directly tied to organization or individual performance and are most effective when based on objective measures of quantity or quality of performance. If we wish to have a direct impact on work motivation, it must be linked directly to the performance of desired behaviors. In order for to put this type of system into place, performance evaluations must be conducted regularly , as well as training and development for those with performance that isn't quite up to par. These additional resources will be necessary for our organization if we implement a performance based pay system. (William B. Bernathy, Ph. D., 2004)

We feel that with us moving forward as a team oriented company we need to reward our teams when they go above and beyond. So here is how we will structure our new monthly incentive plan:

Individual incentive pay plans reward employees for meeting one or a combination of performance standards (e.g. productivity, safety, or attendance) set by the employer (Martocchio. 2013). Piece- rate pay is one of four individual incentive plans offered in the employment industry. Employers have two options to select from when choosing this incentive plan. The first option is compensating the employee hourly for each piece over the given production number. The second option is compensating employees based on established subjective (quality) and objective (quantity) performance standards. In both options the employee is, essentially, being compensated for the work he or she does and not what could have been completed (Gibbons. 1987).  Motivation,

Performance based pay strategy is a variable pay system which is intended to increase employee productivity by rewarding employees based on their performance rather than paying based on the time that an employee spends at work (Wisegeek). Due to the fact that performance based employees have a vested interest in the success of the company their productivity is likely to improve which can lead to the need for fewer employees to maintain production levels leading to a reduction in labor costs to the employer. Studies have shown that time based employees only produce 50 to 60 percent of the output of performance based employees (Atchinson).

I agree with your statement regarding both the merit-based Incentive Payment System and Alternative Payments Models within MACRA. For example, patient care organizations must use efficient and accurate clinical documentation, which has always been an important factor when shifting the healthcare landscape. Clinical documentation is critical to patient care when health care organizations (HCOs) have the ability to control their costs. At the same time, if the HCO is unable to contain the costs and optimize claims, then clinical documentation improvements must be taken seriously because it impacts all the patients and physicians apart of the MACRA. Offering efficient coding and documentation standards, healthcare organizations will have the correct

Chairman Tiberi presides over this hearing and provides a history of the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR). MACRA is a resolution to the 15-year long SGR ruling and is a bipartisan effort to create a stronger Medicare. MACRA is 950 pages of legislation. Many of the representatives related their own personal anecdotes where Medicare has played a role in their lives. MACRA consolidates incentive programs and emphasizes value versus volume. There are two pathways for eligible professionals to follow, that is, Merit-Based Incentive Payment Systems (MIPS) or Alternative Payment Model (APM).

Riordan Manufacturing is a leader in the plastics manufacturing industry. As a fortune 1000 company, this employer of over 500 employees has not only made an investment into the products that roll off the production lines but most importantly the employees who help produce these products (University of Phoenix, 2013). In addition to the annual salary or hourly compensation these employees receive, Riordan makes additional investments in employees to better their wellbeing inside and outside of work. The complete benefit package offered by Riordan is known as the total

helping patients is paramount, the need for getting paid is also significant. That's why it is extremely important to understand how clinicians will be paid for their services. Read on to find out everything that you should know about the new MIPS alteration.

O’Neil (1998) suggests six minimal criteria for the design of a performance based pay system. The first of these criteria is that the reward system should be self-funding, that is, the performance increases should as a minimum offset the cost of the rewards provided. The second criterion is that the distribution of the rewards must be consistent, fair and justifiable. In addition reward plans must be transparent and clearly communicated. The third criterion

Aguinis (2013), teaches us there are many factors that contribute to organizations complimenting an individual performance management system with a team performance aspect. Increased pressures for global competition, the need for product innovation, and the reduction of hierarchical levels in the organization allows for a natural extension of a system that focuses on individual performance only. This paper will analyze the team based reward system designed for the State of Georgia by Georgia’s Department of Human Resources. First, will discuss the positive and negative aspects of their reward system. Next we analyze the labor relations issues facing this reward system and uncover and legal implications the State may be facing. Finally, this paper will make a recommendation to the State of Georgia to improve its current reward system by also taking into account labor relations and legal implications.

Although research generally confirms that pay-for-performance plans can influence greater outcomes, it is unclear how effective different pay plans are relative to each other (Park, 2012). Like most things in business, compensation is something that requires evaluation, study, assessment, strategy, modeling and integration.  Achieving a pay for performance culture does not happen without paying attention to the behaviors, activities, rewards and motivations that have to be linked and reinforced through a well engineered and successfully executed process.  Actually if that process does not tie rewards to shareholder financial objectives, employ the proper mix of compensation elements, result in meaningful dollars, embrace performance that employees can impact and are effectively communicated and reinforced, then the results it produces will likely fall short (Vision Link Advisory Group, 2013).

To foster competitiveness and deliver better results, there is a program called STACK where employees are ranked based on the work done and their incentive is decided based on it. Better the rank, better the incentives.

An incentive pay program can reward employees who continue to produce superior work or encourage employees who already produce good work to best. Sometimes, use an incentive system when employees are lack of enthusiasm of getting down to work and improving things. If everyone in the same job classification gets the same pay, there is no real incentive to do an outstanding job (French, 1990). Various incentive plans used to motivate all employees such as production staff, sales staff, administrative staff and managerial and professional staff on an individual basis. To be improved employee work performance, the incentive pay programs need to be fairly matched with the employees’ expectation. Properly designed and maintained incentive pay program has the potential to increase employees’ productivity and work performance.