preview

Summary: The Caning Of Charles Sumner

Good Essays

The Caning of Charles Sumner Response In 1856 a Senator from Massachusetts named Charles Sumner wanted change for the country of the United States. Specifically change and equal rights to all human being. He sought to free slaves and bring out new opportunity with our country. Sumner was a leading voice in Congress on the Anti-Slavery movement. He wanted to liberate the slaves in the south. Specifically the slaves in Kansas. Kansas had become so violent and bloody that it had been named “Bleeding Kansas” (Hoffer 36). Sumner began writing his speech in hopes to persuade congress to abolish slavery and give equal rights to those slaves. However, something like this is not easily achieved without a toll. Years prior to this the …show more content…

Andrew Brooks went to the capital and found Sumner in the senate chamber. Brooks approached Sumner and said “Mr. Sumner I’ve read your speech twice and I’ve deemed it libel against my relative and my state”. (Hoffer 99) Then began to beat Charles Sumner with his Cane. The completely outrageous part about this is that the senators that were in the room just watched as it happened. No one stopped them and no one helped defend Sumner. Charles was still not well liked by the Northern Colonies because of his arrogance. Preston Brooks now goes to be the hero while Sumner is seen as a villain and is treated as such. However, because of these events the northern colonist grow into the Republican Party (Hoffer 104). A party which Sumner had become a part of. They may not have agreed with the terms that the way the issue was presented like Sumner but they supported his ideals. They to believe in a free America. The Caning was more of a defining point between the North and South and became the next big stepping stone for a violent break out which would be the Civil …show more content…

With all the crops and cotton who else would pick it? People with paid labor perhaps? To the Southern they saw anti-slavery as an insult to economic growth. People saw slavery as this divine order that has continually happened for hundreds of years such as the times in Rome and Greece (Hoffer 122). This debate was just heightened when Christianity had come to America to proceed with the morals of the North and South. The horrible thing that is compared here is the slaves in America to Europe. The South says that these slaves are lucky because they’re taken better care of than the ones in Europe. This is kind of like a double negative. A slave is a slave. It is no means a proper way of life. No human being should be owned by another. We should all be

Get Access