Strengths And Weaknesses

When proofreading, you should check the document for errors. Look for writing errors like, typographical mistakes and misspelled words. You also should pay special attention to design, and layout mistakes, such as missing elements and formatting errors.

Proofreading is the method of checking any form of literature for its grammatical and punctuation errors. It is that stage of putting any literary form into its finality for end-use, whereby the copy can be considered to be perfect. The person who looks into the proofreading task is known as error proofreader.

According to Theurer (2011), miscue analysis is based on the early work of Ken and Yetta Goodman. This method of assessment strategy assists teachers to develop a rich understanding of the reading process of English language learners. A miscue is an unexpected response tat occurs when the reader’s knowledge of language and concepts of the world fails to match the text he or she is reading. This paper will aim to (a) summarize the articles describing retrospective miscue analysis; (b) analyze and critique the articles and the retrospective miscue analysis strategy and (c) implications for English language instructions as per the retrospective miscue analysis strategy.

SWOT analysis is extremely advantageous tool meant for understanding and additionally decision-making for a couple of situations inside corporate in addition to companies. SWOT is a short pertaining for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. The SWOT try headings supply a fantastic structural thing for considering strategy, position with the direction of a company and even business concept.

Students were allowed 3 sec. to correct the miscue, but after that, the teacher supplied the word and asked the student to continue reading. With the phonics-based method, the teacher supplied the sound for each miscue and inability to decode. Reinforcement in the form of tokens was given to motivate students to improve. Findings of the study confirm effectiveness of the two methods to promote reading fluency of students with reading disabilities.

The company has several strengths and weaknesses. A major strength is the patient care that the company provides. The medical and clinical staff genuinely care for the patients, and it shows with the courtesy and respect shown to each patient. Another major strength possessed by the company is how closely the staff works together. Each department works very closely, and are very kind and understanding with each other. One of the weaknesses of the company would be the fact that the particular facility I am employed at is smaller and understaffed. It is very difficult to get time off because there are not many employees to cover shifts.

Learning English as a foreign language can be difficult for students whose mother tongue is Spanish. Frequently, those pupils struggling are the ones who suffer from mistakes and errors when writing in English. Mistakes, if not corrected can become errors, which is a normalized and uncorrected way to pronounce and write a word in the target language (TL)

My current strengths include; my honesty and passion towards my work. I have always been positive and confident regarding my aims and targets. Along with these, I am a good decision maker, due to which I can make right and quick decisions. Moreover, I have ability to motivate others and do team work. I am also a responsible person, when I make a target; I work day and night to achieve my goal.

As I was going over my student's paper, I was noticing many spelling errors as well as word choice errors. For example,

Error Analysis is one of the major topics in the field of second language acquisition research. Errors are an integral part of language learning. The learner of English as a second language is unaware of the existence of the particular system or rule in English language. The learner 's errors have long been interested for second and foreign language researchers. The basic task of error analysis is to describe how learning occurs by examining the learner 's output and this includes his/her correct and incorrect utterances. There are two major approaches to the study of learner 's errors, namely contrastive analysis and error analysis. Error analysis cannot be studied properly without touching upon the notion of contrastive analysis. Contrastive analysis and error analysis have been commonly recognized as branches of Applied Linguistic Science.

Mistakes are the results of poor performance of language due to many factors like fatigue and carelessness on the part of learners etc. Learners have the knowledge of the correct linguistic form and they can self-correct

Usage of written error correction is considered fruitless by many empirical researchers including Truscott (1996) as written error correction is considered most time consuming task for teachers. But some others consider it effective

While speaking, people might make mistakes about tenses, grammars or structures, especially for foreigners. The errors would continue to the written language. Hence, in this paper, I will discuss some grammatical errors of three papers from student paper 3, 5 and 10. The types of paper are different from each other, such as journal, summary and critique. Since different paper types have different structures and expressive methods, it is more precise to discover the common mistakes made by students through different essays. The most common grammar mistakes include punctuation, spelling, verbs tenses, capitalization, incomplete sentence.

This article will analyse two approaches: teachers’ questions and teachers’ treatment of oral errors. Firstly, there will be a relavent literature review and then follows the analysis of the assessment video two in the light of error treatment and teachers’ questions. In the end, improvements will be

Error types for corrective feedback. Research on the error types that need corrective feedback has reported mixed findings, indicating that while corrective feedback influenced the improvement of linguistic knowledge, its effects depended on the types of errors. Ferris (2006) categorized errors into five major groups (verb errors, noun errors, article errors, lexical errors, and sentence errors) and reported that students who received feedback only reduced the incidents of verb errors. Van Beuningen (2010) found that CF was most effective when provided on rule-governed errors (e.g., errors in verb tense and form, subject-verb agreement, article usage, plural and possessive noun endings, and sentence fragments). Van Beuningen et al. (2012) distinguished grammatical errors (morphological errors and syntactic errors) from nongrammatical errors (spelling and mechanical errors) and reported that direct feedback was more beneficial for grammatical errors and indirect feedback for nongrammatical errors. Bitchener and Ferris (2012) stated that teachers should provide feedback on errors (systematic incorrectness indicating gaps in students’ interlanguage structure) but not on mistakes (unsystematic incorrectness, such as memory failures) and suggested that teachers should respond to high-frequency and stigmatizing errors.