preview

Stem Cells Case Study

Decent Essays

Question 1
Figure 3 is difficult to interpret because it seems to be missing a group. What group seems to be missing? How would the inclusion of this group aid in the interpretation of this figure?

Answer:
The authors used 1mM of melatonin, dissolved in 50% of PBS and 50% buffer solution, as the melatonin treatment for cancer stem cell viability assay. The data obtained from melatonin treatment was compared with a control group. However, they did not mention the treatment condition of control group, and the vehicle that was used to dissolve the melatonin, might have some effect on the viability of cancer stem cells. Therefore, they should include the vehicle treatment group in figure 3. Inclusion of vehicle group will strengthen their claim …show more content…

Please compare the negative control with melatonin.
Which has the higher potency? Which has higher efficacy? Please define positive and negative controls and state whether you think their choices fulfill those criteria.

Answer:
The data showed in figure 6, are form Boyden chamber assay that was used to observe the invasion or movement of cells from one place to another. In this assay the authors used three treatment groups; i. 1mM melatonin supplemented with 10% FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum), ii. 10% FBS supplement defined as positive control, and iii. 0.5% FBS supplement as a negative control. Although the figure was shown in two sub-part, but we can compare the melatonin group with the negative control group because all data were normalized by positive control. The authors conducted the Boyden chamber assay in canine (CMT-U229) and human (MCF-7) breast cancer stem cells. 1mM melatonin decreased cell invasion by 40.4% in canine breast cancer stem cells and by 56.3% in human breast cancer stem cells compared to the positive control. However, negative control further decreased cell invasion compared to melatonin treatment. Although the authors did not mention any exact number, it could be assumed from figure 6 that negative control decreased cell invasion by about 90% in canine breast cancer stem cells and by about 95% in human breast cancer stem cells compared to positive control. Therefore, the percentage of inhibition of cell invasion was higher for negative control compared to the melatonin group in both types of cancer stem cells. However, we cannot confirm that this comparison is precise due to lack of statistical comparison. Student’s t-test was used to compare between two groups, whereas, ANOVA needs to be used for three or more groups. Therefore, if we want to compare among positive control, melatonin treatment and negative control we need to run one-way ANOVA

Get Access