Specificity In Coding

Uninformative codes can create confusion to what the code details. This language needs to be clear and detailed so that the health care organizations can provide the best health care as possible. When codes are

I love coding in my free time and I do truly believe that I flourish when I find myself coding. The limits of what you can do with coding are next to non-existent, and the idea of a platform with infinite possibilities engrosses me and leads to me to work as efficiently as possible towards the end goal of creating a product in which I see infinite possibilities. On top of that, another possible contributing reason for why I think coding may allow me to flourish is that with the infinite possibilities (as I stated before) comes curiosity, a curiosity that has no conclusion. The feeling of curiosity I feel as I code has a cause and effect relationship with me in that it turns me onto new methods of coding or new languages of coding which then

➤ Diagnosis classification system developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for use in all U.S. health care treatment settings. Diagnosis coding under this system uses 3–7 alpha and numeric digits and full code titles, but the format is very much the same as ICD-9-CM

Diagnosis type included four levels (emphysema, asthma, chronic bronchitis, and allergies), age consisted of two levels (middle age adult and older adult), and gender (male and female).

codes, 2016-17). This diagnostic code would appear to be insensitive to the complex nature of

As viewed by many HIM professionals Computer-assisted coding is a valuable tool for enhancing the effectiveness of coding and billing. CAC software scans medical documentation in the electronic health record (EHRs) using a natural language processing (NLP) engine, identifying key terminology and proposing codes for that specific treatment or service. Human coder then revised these codes. CAC can also investigate the background of key words to conclude whether they need coding.

Of the coding topics discussed in this unit , I believe that Level of Specificity , which is the level of detail . And detail is very important in diagnosis coding . Coding must be done to its highest level to receive maximum reimbursement for claims submitted. I also believe that combination codes are very important also, because the combination code can only be assigned when that code fully identifies the diagnostic condition involved, or when the Alphabetic Index so directs. I think they are important because it could very well make the coding very confusing . I also think that there are no areas of coding that are not as relevant as the other , I believe we should know everything possibly to be known about coding , to give us the

The outmoded coding professional’s role was to describe and apportion diagnosis, procedure, and other medicinal service codes using ICD-9-CM and HCPCS/CPT coding classifications while referencing the Coding Clinic for ICD-9-CM, Coding Clinic for HCPCS,

Category two signifies time-critical conditions or presentation of severe pain, with assessment and treatment necessary within ten minutes. The third and fourth categories represent potentially life-threatening conditions to be assessed within thirty minutes and potentially serious conditions to be assessed within sixty minutes respectively, and the assessment of situational urgency is essential in both cases. Minor symptoms and non-urgent conditions epitomise the fifth and final category (Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, 2013).

To establish medical necessity, diagnosis codes have to be correctly linked to procedures. What is provided to a patients by the health care worker and or doctor’s needs to have medical codes assigned to them. This way billing can be attached correctly. An example would be if you cut your hand with a knife

I believe that the level of specificity is very important. The more specific of the diagnosis the more reimbursement the company get. The more specific of the diagnosis the better coding and specific coding you could do. I believe that the level of specificity is the more important but I also think that the threatened conditions is important too. Reasoning being is that if a patient come and with bleeding of the head from a wound and the bleeding would not stop. That would be considered as threatening, because the bleeding wouldn't stop. If a patient comes in with a nose bleed, that would not be considered as threatening but you would have to get specific. What is the nose bleed from how long and what happen later after the nose bleed.

In medical coding, the primary diagnosis is the condition that needs the most attention and care. The principal diagnosis is the condition that causes the patient’s

In the beginning, normally one physician would care for the patient. The constant advancement in the field of medicine requires a multiple number of physicians to pick a specialty and focus on it as medicine is now being focused on a specific "set" of issues. "The reliance of healthcare on constant evolving technologies mandates continual learning." Keeping an eye/ear out for gaining knowledge that will help you in the specialty field you choose to pursue is an ongoing task that will require checking in daily to see what if any new advancements are on the horizon. "Coders must be familiar with the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) rules and private payer rules.""

Content specificity refers to the subjects matter that is to be tested. The subject matter could cover any aspect of the curriculum, math, spelling, reading, or any academic skill. Specificity refers to the specific skill within a content area. No content area consist of only one component, each area has multiple levels of understanding the must take place for a student to be proficient. The component that is specifically being assessed is the test specificity. Specificity can be general or very precise depending on the purpose of the assessment. A unit pre-assessment may look at a wide range of skills to determine what students already know. A formative assessment may only look at one or two component skills within the unit. For progress monitoring

The coding systems and standardized clinical expressions are connected; with the coding schemes developed for classification systems, nomenclatures, and clinical languages. According to Rutherford (2008), standardized nursing language can upsurge the patients’ quality of nursing care through contribution of “better communication amongst nurses and other healthcare providers, increase visibility of nursing interventions, improved patients care, enhanced data collection to evaluate nursing care outcomes, greater adherence to standards of care and facilitated assessment of nursing competency” (para.6). The above nursing standardized languages sanctions a higher quality and source of evidence-based practice amidst