The interview was with a 17-year-old male adolescent student who attends the high school where I work. I met the student in passing in the library and asked if he had a few minutes to answer some questions. The purpose of this interview was to apply solution-focused therapy (SFT) strategies and to ask a miracle question. I explained that I was taking a class and I needed to interview a student for the assignment. The student agreed and we started to discuss how his day began. My goal of quickly gathering precise, useful, and insightful information from the student that can help me solve a problem later. The student presented as relaxed and calm at the beginning. He lightly tapped his feet, fidgeted with his hands, and repeatedly shifted his …show more content…
The student mentioned his interest and past participation in the sport of football. I related this to personal interest in this same sport growing up. We briefly shared what position we played and a few brief highlights we had while playing football. The miracle question I asked the student was if he could graduate today from high school, would that solve all his worldly problems? The student responded with yes, but his parents would be upset because they would want him to stay in school until May 2018. I emphasized the importance of understanding his parents feeling and plans for him were important to keep in mind. It is my belief that using empathetic statements it is important to be genuine and to not try to over empathize or falsely empathize with others. I struggled during the interview with the lack of control or loss of direction at times. During a couple of portions of the interview the student strayed from the focus of the questions and moved off on tangents which lost precious time and garnered little useful information. Therefore, to improve in the next two weeks I can be more assertive in redirecting the student, so that the interview stays on track and I can use more focus statements to reign in a wandering interview so I can gain the necessary
This paper will focus on client’s presenting concerns and her biopsysocial system. Reader will explore how Solution Focused Therapy and Harm Reduction Therapy are relevant to client’s problems and why they would be most effective for client. Two intervention models that are relevant to the theories chosen will be outlined and how they relate to the client. An intervention plan that includes goals for the client will be evaluated and measured. Finally, the paper will discuss how the model chosen for intervention will have an impact on the macro level of change.
The current essay focuses on two different therapeutic techniques, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Solution Focused Brief Therapy. The initial component of the essay outlines the therapeutic orientations of both approaches; then, the different approaches are related to a case study of a young lady called Linda who is seeking counseling due to feelings of hopelessness. The essay is then finished with some of the author’s personal opinions on the two therapeutic approaches.
Among the three counseling theory for this week study, I identified with Solution-Focused Brief therapy simply because its method is focused on expand the best parts of a client’s life rather than the number of sessions (Henderson & Thompson, 2011). Another focus of Solution-Focused brief therapy is seeking solutions for clients’ problems rather than search for explanations about his or her problems or how the problem was developed (Henderson & Thompson, 2011). In SFBT “people’s problem result from behavior based on their view of the world” (Henderson & Thompson, 2011, p. 317). The solution process does not have to start with a perfect solution for the client’s problem, rather the therapist can provide the client with a “skeleton key”. It is a term, created by Steve de Shazer, the leading figure of SFT, that refers to interventions that work for a variety of problems that fit sufficiently well so that a solution can progress (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2013).
Solution focused therapy is a model of therapy developed by Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg in the late 1970's (Dolan, n.d.). This model has become well known for its non-traditional approach to client problems as it does not explore clients issues in relation to their cause and affect but rather the goals and solutions to achieving a future free of any present issues. i will be discussing the evident concepts, principles and intervention techniques of this particular model. it will be explored in the context of a case scenario of a therapy session to observe how the model can be actively applied to therapy sessions and why this is the best model to meet the client's needs. The effectiveness of the model
When viewing this family in a Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) lens, we would focus on the solutions rather than the problem. Although the initial assessment would be similar to that of structural and strategic therapy, all of these issues would be explore, we would focus on the solutions rather than the problem. Although the initial assessment would be similar to that of structural and strategic therapy, all of these issues would be explored in a way that allowed for less “problem talk” and more solution based ideas.
A few of the techniques explains to the client which technique words and what doesn’t in a family setting. In the beginning, it’s more about bringing out concerns more than something that may or may not be taking place in the household. Solution-Focused Therapy also focuses on goals and helpful strategies. The true purpose for this type of therapy is focusing on family strengths. One example of the solution-focused therapy is the formula first session task. This task is an example of showing the family what helps. Also, the counselor is constantly asking questions and doing observations to see how well things go when the family leaves therapy. Another example is the exception question. This is usually the counselor looking at the family and
It is my goal to become a school counselor in a local high school. As a school counselor, it is also important to try and understand the different experiences that children go through in order to get through to them. After studying the different counseling theories, I have discovered that each theory is valid and there are ideas and techniques that I would use out of each of them. However, there are some theories more than others that I would use to guide me daily as a school counselor. Modern day counseling is equipped with a wide variety of therapies, techniques and approaches. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast three approaches of therapy. Also in this essay the views of the person and the Therapeutic process will be
I was asked to conduct an interview with someone who had knowledge about my research topic, to help provide me with information. My research topic is whether college athletes should receive pay, therefore, I conducted an interview, over email, with one of my high school coaches Mike Zarger. Not only is Mike a coach, he was also a student athlete at Penn State University. Zarger was a phenomenal athlete himself, striving in both cross country and track. He is also a father of two girls that went to West Virginia University and the other went to Virginia Tech University to run cross country. I decided to conduct my interview with Zarger because he was a college athlete, a coach, and not to mention a parent of two college athletes himself.
Solution-Focused Therapy (SFT) was drawn out from the work of Milton Erickson. Most people identify SFT with the variation work from Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg. Solution-focused therapy is a therapy that is action oriented and focuses on finding solutions. In SFT, the client is considered the expert (they know exactly what the problem is), and the client has the resources to find a solution. SFT does not focus on diagnoses or assessments but focuses on what the client brings to therapy. Depending on the client and the problem, SFT has a 50% successful rate. SFT has many techniques to use to assist in finding solutions for problems. These techniques range from questioning the client to having the client complete homework assignments.
This term paper is about solution-focused therapy and experiential therapy. In solution-focused therapy, the therapy does not emphasize the problem at all; it stresses and highlights the solution. The client is the expert and not the therapist. The experiential approach is often used to facilitate meaningful changes in individuals. SFBT is a short-term goal focused therapeutic approach which directs clients to focus on developing solutions, rather than on dwelling on problems. The theoretical framework, how change occurs, therapeutic techniques, postmodern perspective, the role of the therapist and some clinical examples are given in this term paper.
Adlerian, Cognitive Behavioral, and Solution Focused Brief Therapy are three major theories that are used today. All three theories have things that make them similar as well as different.
Many parents in Anita’s poverty-stricken neighborhood are quite concerned about the safety of their children. Their surrounding areas are impoverished and full of community violence. It would be beneficial to have a social worker visit Anita’s community to advocate for the concerned parents and community members by applying a solution-focused therapy (SFT). SFT can support the worried members by finding the necessary resources to address their community’s challenges to promote change. Anita and her neighbors are highly aware of the changes that are needed for them to feel safe. Practicing SFT with these community members can help them to clarify their goals. A social worker would encourage these members to envision their solution, or what community change would look like by
People encounter various challenges in life ranging from diseases, lack of basic essential needs and psychiatric problems among others. This has given rise to various forms of therapies being adopted by specialists whilst offering solutions to depressed individuals. Group therapy has taken a center-stage in the management of depression. Butler et al (2008) in their article titled "Meditation with yoga, group therapy with hypnosis, and psychoeducation for long-term depressed mood: a randomized pilot trial" show that depression and anxiety form part of the well-known conditions named by individuals seeking treatment using therapies and complementary alternatives. Alternative therapies include yoga, qigong, tai chi, mediation, and exercise. They argue that people are increasingly using these therapies. Butler provides information claiming that yoga and exercise are effective therapies with high rates than uncontrolled activities (Butler, et al 2008). The authors also demonstrate that these therapies can be compared to established anxiety treatments and depression treatments such as sertraline, cognitive behavioral therapy, and imipramine.
This paper uses the application, concepts and techniques from The Solution-Focused Brief Therapy and The Satir Model under Family Therapy in working with the case study of George.
Understanding that solution-focused therapists operate under the assumption that clients already have the necessary skills to solve their problems, it is our job as therapists to help them regain insight into their problems. Therefore, it is understandable why solution-focused therapy is considered a brief therapeutic approach. If the clients already have the ability to solve their own issues then they just need to be reminded of their strengths and resources, shifting the focus.