preview

Simone De Beauvoir Patriarchy

Decent Essays

In her works, Simone de Beauvoir attacks the patriarchy of her era with a blistering report on what she believes causes sexual tension in society. She does so by defining the characteristics and basics of the conflict, by exploring the perceived differences in man and woman. De Beauvoir explains in The Second Sex what has defined woman as the “other” of society, while discussing how existential bad faith and anxiety have a role in the objectification process. By dissecting the differences in the oppression of women and general economic oppression, she highlights the importance of deconstructing the blatantly negative system of sexism which prevails in human society. Doing so allows her to express her ideal world, one in which the modern …show more content…

De Beauvoir gives the best example of this in her story of the man and woman on a date. In this scene, the man makes overt signs that he is sexually interested in the woman he is talking to. At the same time, the woman has no interest in sex with this man, and is simply spending time with him for her own satisfaction. While they are speaking, the woman is able convince herself that his intentions are noble and pure, and that he is simply admiring her beauty. By doing so, she strips the man of his intended action and renders his goals passive in her mind. However, when he places his hand upon hers she is required to make a decision. The woman understands that leaving her hand under his is a sign of consent, and if she knows this she is required to come to terms with the reality of his desires. If she were to move her hand, she would be denied the satisfaction granted to her by the man’s attention. It is here that the emancipated and feminine women diverge. As the woman is feminine, she revels in her indecision and continually debates her course of action. She puts “flesh above the spirit,” and “contingence above liberty.” She has based her self-worth on a falsity which she convinced herself …show more content…

From the position of object, the women of her period sought subjectivity and the resulting reaction from men was confusion. Previous women acted based upon the existential angst that they felt, which led the majority of them to an existence of bad faith. To run from the responsibility of their radical freedom, these women took the roles easily granted to them by society and allowed men to make their decisions and take actions in their name. Living this way was easy and required little responsibility on their part, but was in bad faith because it limited their freedom based upon fear. However, the progressive women of de Beauvoir’s period were also living in bad faith by attempting to retain their passivity and seeking the freedom of action. The woman in the story above is acting in bad faith when she convinces herself that the man’s intentions are anything but sexually oriented. Purposefully living a lie, or refraining from making a decision based upon a fear of reality, are the very basis of what both Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir describe as bad faith. Women who see the reality of the world and actively take action in spite of their obstacles are those who live in good faith. The individuals who reject the subordinate roles that they are expected to fill are those who understand their freedom. Living as an object of

Get Access